Linear Optimization

1993 ◽  
pp. 195-224
Author(s):  
Ulrich Kulisch ◽  
Rolf Hammer ◽  
Dietmar Ratz ◽  
Matthias Hocks
Keyword(s):  
Linear Optimization

Optimal Test Assembly in Practice

2013 ◽  
Vol 221 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg-Tobias Kuhn ◽  
Thomas Kiefer
Keyword(s):  
Particle Physics ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Linear Optimization ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Optimal Test ◽  
Automated Test Assembly ◽  
Test Assembly ◽  
Block Level ◽  
Mixed Integer Linear Optimization

Several techniques have been developed in recent years to generate optimal large-scale assessments (LSAs) of student achievement. These techniques often represent a blend of procedures from such diverse fields as experimental design, combinatorial optimization, particle physics, or neural networks. However, despite the theoretical advances in the field, there still exists a surprising scarcity of well-documented test designs in which all factors that have guided design decisions are explicitly and clearly communicated. This paper therefore has two goals. First, a brief summary of relevant key terms, as well as experimental designs and automated test assembly routines in LSA, is given. Second, conceptual and methodological steps in designing the assessment of the Austrian educational standards in mathematics are described in detail. The test design was generated using a two-step procedure, starting at the item block level and continuing at the item level. Initially, a partially balanced incomplete item block design was generated using simulated annealing, whereas in a second step, items were assigned to the item blocks using mixed-integer linear optimization in combination with a shadow-test approach.

Order Constrained Linear Optimization

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe W. Tidwell ◽  
Michael Dougherty ◽  
Rick P. Thomas ◽  
Jeffrey S. Chrabaszcz
Keyword(s):  
Linear Optimization

Nonlinear and Mixed-Integer Optimization

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christodoulos A. Floudas
Keyword(s):  
Nonlinear Optimization ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Chemical Engineering ◽  
Applied Mathematics ◽  
Linear Optimization ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Process Synthesis ◽  
Synthesis Process ◽  
Integer Optimization ◽  
Mixed Integer Optimization

Filling a void in chemical engineering and optimization literature, this book presents the theory and methods for nonlinear and mixed-integer optimization, and their applications in the important area of process synthesis. Other topics include modeling issues in process synthesis, and optimization-based approaches in the synthesis of heat recovery systems, distillation-based systems, and reactor-based systems. The basics of convex analysis and nonlinear optimization are also covered and the elementary concepts of mixed-integer linear optimization are introduced. All chapters have several illustrations and geometrical interpretations of the material as well as suggested problems. Nonlinear and Mixed-Integer Optimization will prove to be an invaluable source--either as a textbook or a reference--for researchers and graduate students interested in continuous and discrete nonlinear optimization issues in engineering design, process synthesis, process operations, applied mathematics, operations research, industrial management, and systems engineering.

A New Predictor-corrector Infeasible Interior-point Algorithm for Linear Optimization in aWide Neighborhood

2020 ◽  
Vol 177 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-156
Author(s):  
Behrouz Kheirfam
Keyword(s):  
Interior Point ◽  
Interior Point Method ◽  
Linear Optimization ◽  
Point Method ◽  
Central Path ◽  
Interior Point Algorithm ◽  
Positive Direction ◽  
Complexity Result ◽  
Infeasible Interior Point Method ◽  
Predictor Corrector

In this paper, we propose a Mizuno-Todd-Ye type predictor-corrector infeasible interior-point method for linear optimization based on a wide neighborhood of the central path. According to Ai-Zhang’s original idea, we use two directions of distinct and orthogonal corresponding to the negative and positive parts of the right side vector of the centering equation of the central path. In the predictor stage, the step size along the corresponded infeasible directions to the negative part is chosen. In the corrector stage by modifying the positive directions system a full-Newton step is removed. We show that, in addition to the predictor step, our method reduces the duality gap in the corrector step and this can be a prominent feature of our method. We prove that the iteration complexity of the new algorithm is 𝒪(n log ɛ−1), which coincides with the best known complexity result for infeasible interior-point methods, where ɛ > 0 is the required precision. Due to the positive direction new system, we improve the theoretical complexity bound for this kind of infeasible interior-point method [1] by a factor of n . Numerical results are also provided to demonstrate the performance of the proposed algorithm.

scholarly journals Approximation of continuous random variables for the evaluation of the reliability parameter of complex stress–strength models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Barbiero ◽  
Asmerilda Hitaj
Keyword(s):  
Order Approximation ◽  
Linear Optimization ◽  
Closed Form Solution ◽  
Random Variables ◽  
Discrete Distribution ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Form Solution ◽  
Engineering Problem ◽  
Approximation Technique ◽  
Reliability Parameter

AbstractIn many management science or economic applications, it is common to represent the key uncertain inputs as continuous random variables. However, when analytic techniques fail to provide a closed-form solution to a problem or when one needs to reduce the computational load, it is often necessary to resort to some problem-specific approximation technique or approximate each given continuous probability distribution by a discrete distribution. Many discretization methods have been proposed so far; in this work, we revise the most popular techniques, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses, and empirically investigate their performance through a comparative study applied to a well-known engineering problem, formulated as a stress–strength model, with the aim of weighting up their feasibility and accuracy in recovering the value of the reliability parameter, also with reference to the number of discrete points. The results overall reward a recently introduced method as the best performer, which derives the discrete approximation as the numerical solution of a constrained non-linear optimization, preserving the first two moments of the original distribution. This method provides more accurate results than an ad-hoc first-order approximation technique. However, it is the most computationally demanding as well and the computation time can get even larger than that required by Monte Carlo approximation if the number of discrete points exceeds a certain threshold.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document