Anthony Giddens, Hrsg., Emile Durkheim: Selected Writings

2021 ◽  
pp. 159-160
Author(s):  
René König
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-34
Author(s):  
Domingos Bombo Damião

O presente artigo teve como objectivo analisar os factores psicossociais que se associam na prática dos crimes no Bairro Rocha Pinto. Neste estudo, os principais autores de base foram: Cesare Lombroso (2007), Émile Durkheim (2007), Anthony Giddens (2008), João Farias Júnior (2008) e Paulo de Carvalho (2010). Quanto a metodologia, utilizou-se a pesquisa quantitativa, o instrumento utilizado para a recolha de dados, foi o questionário e a pesquisa bibliográfica. Participaram no estudo 45 sujeitos (28 do género masculino e 17 do feminino), com a média de idade de 19,83 (Desvio Padrão = 9,3). Foi aplicada aos participantes um questionário com um formato que se ajusta à escala de Likert, composto por (3) três indicadores: comportamento, sociedade e doença mental, e (8) oito itens, cujos dados foram submetidos ao pacote informático SPSS. Os resultados obtidos indicam que os factores psicossociais estão ligados à prática dos crimes. Com base nos resultados apurados, chegou-se a duas conclusões, uma psicológica e outra social. Concluiu-se que, as diferenças individuais tais como à personalidade, desagregação familiar, a frustração, carências de sentimentos afectivos e morais, a desorganização social, problemas de auto-estima e outros mecanismos internos e instintivos do indivíduo, são factores que influenciam à prática de crimes.


Author(s):  
Dominique Schnapper

The French are not familiar with British sociology. As a first indicator, British sociology is hardly ever translated into French. In Britain, Anthony Giddens is the most cited and the most widely read British sociologist, along with Karl Marx, Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, and Talcott Parsons. British sociology is not well known and is rather uninfluential in France. On the one hand, its so-called ‘classical’ form, used by the 1950 generation, appears to many to be too rigorous and too marked by ‘positivism’. This type of sociology is therefore the object of criticism both on the continent and among young British sociologists. What is striking when reading British sociology is that British research has often been more rigorous than French research because it is based on fieldwork of an anthropological nature, an approach which French scholars have often been reticent about. Moreover, British researchers are more scathing, when it comes to criticism of their own nation, than their French counterparts.


2013 ◽  
pp. 181-182
Author(s):  
René König ◽  
Clemens Albrecht

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-93
Author(s):  
Elif Gezgin
Keyword(s):  

Mil neuf cent ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Claude Filloux
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Arizka Warganegara

This study is about the law development of social democracy in the perspective of Eduard Bernstein andAnthony Giddens. It applied the method of qualitative analysis and used the library research, the data inthis study analyzed with the content of analysis. The main purposes of this study wants to describe andanalysis of Law Development of Social Democracy in the perspective of Bernstein and Giddens.Socialism Democracy of Bernstein and Cosmopolitan Democracy of Giddens used as toll of comparative.Social Democracy has been revision three times, Bernstein is the first generation, The second generationis Social Democratic Party of Germany with The bad Godesberg Program and the last is Giddens. Theinteresting of this study is the basic difference among Bernstein and Giddens in the understanding ofconcept of Social Democracy. The different time and context imply the different ontology andepistemology to this ideology. If Bernstein lived in the time of raised of capitalism and Industrialization inEurope, Giddens has lived in the time of this ideology must be against the raises of Neo liberalism andGlobalization. Actually The basic concept of Social democracy of Bersntein is his critics to the theory andconcept of Karl Marx, this causes the different perspective with Giddens. Finally Giddens made thisideology more Liberal than before, many political scientist assume that The Third Way of Giddens is thecontinuously of Capitalism.Keywords : Social Democracy, Bad Godesberg and Capitalism


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document