Computer Science Meets Evolutionary Biology: Pure Possible Processes and the Issue of Gradualism

Author(s):  
Philippe Huneman
Author(s):  
Andrew LaBrunda ◽  
Michelle LaBrunda

It is impossible to pinpoint the exact moment at which computational biology became a discipline of its own, but one could say that it was in 1997 when the society of computational biology was formed. Regardless of its exact birthday, the research community has rapidly adopted computational biology and its applications are being vigorously explored. The study and application of medicine is a dynamic challenge. Changes in medicine usually take place as a result of new knowledge acquired through observation and experimentation. When a tamping rod 1-inch thick went through Phineas Gage’s head in 1848, his survival gave the medical field an unusual opportunity to observe behavior of a person missing their prefrontal cortex. This observation lead to the short-lived psychosurgical procedure known as a lobotomy, which attempted to change a person’s behavior by separating two portions of a person’s brain (Pols, 2001). Countless observations, experiments and mistakes represent how almost all medical knowledge has been acquired. The relatively new field of computational biology offers a nontraditional approach to contribute to the medical body of knowledge. Computational biology is a new field combining biology, computer science, and mathematics to solve problems that are unworkable with traditional biological techniques. It includes traditional areas such as systems biology, molecular biology, biochemistry, biophysics, statistics, and computer science, as well as recently developed disciplines including bioinformatics and computational genomics. Algorithms, which are able to closely model biological behavior, validate the medical understanding of the observed processes and can be used to model scenarios that might not be able to be physically reproduced. The goal of computational biology is to use mathematics and computer science to model biological systems on the molecular level. Instead of taking on large complex systems, computational biology is starting small, literally. Modeling problems in molecular biology and biochemistry is a far less daunting task. At a microscopic level, patient’s characteristics drop out of the equation and all information behavior affecting is known. This creates a deterministic model which, given the same input, will always produce the same output. Some of the major subdisciplines of computational biology are computational genomics, systems biology, protein structure prediction, and evolutionary biology, all of which model microscopic structures.


AI & Society ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Svensson

AbstractDeparting from popular imaginations around artificial intelligence (AI), this article engages in the I in the AI acronym but from perspectives outside of mathematics, computer science and machine learning. When intelligence is attended to here, it most often refers to narrow calculating tasks. This connotation to calculation provides AI an image of scientificity and objectivity, particularly attractive in societies with a pervasive desire for numbers. However, as is increasingly apparent today, when employed in more general areas of our messy socio-cultural realities, AI- powered automated systems often fail or have unintended consequences. This article will contribute to this critique of AI by attending to Nicholas of Cusa and his treatment of intelligence. According to him, intelligence is equally dependent on an ability to handle the unknown as it unfolds in the present moment. This suggests that intelligence is organic which ties Cusa to more contemporary discussions in tech philosophy, neurology, evolutionary biology, and cognitive sciences in which it is argued that intelligence is dependent on having—and acting through—an organic body. Understanding intelligence as organic thus suggests an oxymoronic relationship to artificial.


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan R. Templeton ◽  
Stephanie D. Maskas ◽  
Mitchell B. Cruzan

1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1007-1008
Author(s):  
Rodney L. Lowman

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald D. Davis ◽  
Shannon K. Meert ◽  
Debra A. Major ◽  
Janis V. Sanchez-Hucles ◽  
Sandra J. Deloatch
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edusmildo Orozco ◽  
Rafael Arce-Nazario ◽  
Peter Musial ◽  
Cynthia Lucena-Roman ◽  
Zoraida Santiago

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document