Is a Scientific Archaeology Possible?

Author(s):  
Robert C. Dunnell
2020 ◽  
pp. 27-43
Author(s):  
Brian M. Fagan ◽  
Nadia Durrani

Author(s):  
Nico Roymans

This chapter provides an overview of the book’s main themes. The book gives Anglophone readers a representative, well-grounded survey of the current status of the archaeology of Roman Germany. It reveals a discipline that is evolving strongly in an interpretative sense, a discipline to which traditional stereotypical labels such as ‘positivist’ and ‘descriptive’ or ‘an archaeology at risk’ (Bloemers 2002) no longer apply. German archaeologists face the challenge of continuing to nurture their rigorous historicizing and empirical traditions, while at the same time seeking closer integration with social theory-building and the findings of scientific archaeology. The contributions to this volume are steps in this direction.


2012 ◽  
pp. 231-254
Author(s):  
Richard Hingley

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (07) ◽  
pp. 39-4057-39-4057

1942 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Bennett

In recent years there has been a lamentable tendency on the part of academic archaeologists to professionalize their field, with a consequently growing distinction between “amateurs” and “professionals.” That this distinction is a false one has been demonstrated by the work of such “amateurs” as Lemley of Arkansas, Langford of Illinois, and many others. The boundary between these two classes of excavators has been one of attachment or non-attachment to an academic institution, without regard to the real issue: techniques. This distinction is happily undergoing process of change, as the very existence of American Antiquity bears witness. Founded as an outlet for both amateur and professional work, it has done much to allay hostilities and opposition on both sides.


1991 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 590-592
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Riley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document