Short- and Long-Term Memory as a Function of Individual Differences in Arousal

1976 ◽  
pp. 376-382
Author(s):  
John W. Osborne
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Short And Long Term

Short- and long-term memory tasks predict working memory performance, and vice versa.

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Neath ◽  
Jean Saint-Aubin ◽  
Tamra J. Bireta ◽  
Andrew J. Gabel ◽  
Chelsea G. Hudson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Short And Long Term

The Improvement of Short- and Long-term Memory of Young Children by BF-7

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Do-Hee Kim ◽  
Ok-Hyeon Kim ◽  
Joo-Hong Yeo ◽  
Kwang-Gill Lee ◽  
Geum-Duck Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Short And Long Term

Impaired short- and long-term memory in Ts65Dn mice, a model for Down syndrome

1998 ◽  
Vol 247 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 171-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa M Escorihuela ◽  
Iria F Vallina ◽  
Carmen Martı́nez-Cué ◽  
Carmela Baamonde ◽  
Mara Dierssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Short And Long Term

Effect of Type of Task and Number of Inspectors on Performance of an Industrial Inspection-Type Task

1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Stanislaw
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Forced Choice ◽  
Sensory Memory ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Rating Task ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Industrial Inspection ◽  
Inspection Task ◽  
Practical Implications

Two hundred forty subjects working alone and in pairs performed three different versions of a task similar to industrial inspection: a rating task and spatial and temporal two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks. Performance was worse on the rating task than on the 2AFC tasks, and the spatial and temporal 2AFC tasks were performed equally well. These results could signify that performance is impaired more by demands made on long-term memory than by demands made on perception and sensory memory, or that asking subjects to compare items is fundamentally different from, and easier than, asking subjects to judge items in absolute terms. Individual differences in performance were marked, but performance was inconsistent across different versions of the inspection task. When subjects worked in pairs, performance was comparable to that obtained by requiring items to pass two inspections by individual subjects. However, a single inspection by subject pairs required less time than two inspections by individual subjects. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document