Boundary Values of Holomorphic Functions

1977 ◽  
pp. 298-314
Author(s):  
N. I. Muskhelishvili
Keyword(s):  
Holomorphic Functions ◽  
Boundary Values

scholarly journals Bounded and Almost Periodic Ultradistributions as Boundary Values of Holomorphic Functions

2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1295-1311
Author(s):  
C. Fernández ◽  
A. Galbis ◽  
M.C. Gómez-Collado
Keyword(s):  
Holomorphic Functions ◽  
Almost Periodic ◽  
Boundary Values

scholarly journals Holomorphic extension of generalizations ofHpfunctions

1985 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Carmichael
Keyword(s):  
Convex Hull ◽  
Extension Theorem ◽  
Holomorphic Functions ◽  
Holomorphic Extension ◽  
Finite Union ◽  
Convex Cones ◽  
Recent Analysis ◽  
Boundary Values ◽  
Connected Component ◽  
Open Convex

In recent analysis we have defined and studied holomorphic functions in tubes inℂnwhich generalize the HardyHpfunctions in tubes. In this paper we consider functionsf(z),z=x+iy, which are holomorphic in the tubeTC=ℝn+iC, whereCis the finite union of open convex conesCj,j=1,…,m, and which satisfy the norm growth of our new functions. We prove a holomorphic extension theorem in whichf(z),z ϵ TC, is shown to be extendable to a function which is holomorphic inT0(C)=ℝn+i0(C), where0(C)is the convex hull ofC, if the distributional boundary values in𝒮′off(z)from each connected componentTCjofTCare equal.

A POLAR DECOMPOSITION FOR HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS ON A STRIP

2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
KONRAD SCHMÜDGEN
Keyword(s):  
Holomorphic Function ◽  
Real Axis ◽  
Polar Decomposition ◽  
Holomorphic Functions ◽  
Heisenberg Algebra ◽  
Boundary Values ◽  
Operator Representation ◽  
The Real ◽  
Almost Everywhere

Let f be a holomorphic function on the strip {z ∈ [Copf ] : −α < Im z < α}, where α > 0, belonging to the class [Hscr ](α,−α;ε) defined below. It is shown that there exist holomorphic functions w1 on {z ∈ [Copf ] : 0 < Im z < 2α} and w2 on {z ∈ [Copf ] : −2α < Im z < 2α}, such that w1 and w2 have boundary values of modulus one on the real axis, and satisfy the relationsw1(z)=f(z-αi)w2(z-2αi) and w2(z+2αi)=f(z+αi)w1(z)for 0 < Im z < 2α, where f(z) := f(z). This leads to a ‘polar decomposition’ f(z) = uf(z + αi)gf(z) of the function f(z), where uf (z + αi) and gf(z) are holomorphic functions for −α < Im z < α, such that [mid ]uf(x)[mid ] = 1 and gf(x) [ges ] 0 almost everywhere on the real axis. As a byproduct, an operator representation of a q-deformed Heisenberg algebra is developed.

scholarly journals Common boundary values of holomorphic functions for two-sided complex structures

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Bertrand ◽  
Xianghong Gong ◽  
Jean-Pierre Rosay
Keyword(s):  
Holomorphic Functions ◽  
Complex Structures ◽  
Boundary Values ◽  
Common Boundary
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document