Commentary: Assessment: The Pros and Cons of this Necessary “Evil”

Author(s):  
Norman G. Lederman
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol V (III) ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Bakht Munir ◽  
Ali Nawaz Khan ◽  
Naveed Ahmad

With the evolution of the modern welfare state system, state functions have multiplied manifold that consequently necessitated delegation of wide-ranged discretionary powers in the hands of administrative authorities to address ever-growing complex issues with the help of framing rules and deciding matters accordingly, which otherwise came within the exclusive domain of legislative and judicial authorities. With qualitative research methodology, this research aimed to investigate how the idea of administration emerges and whether or not discretion is an unavoidable evil. The research at hand conceptualized administrative actions, various modes for conferring discretion, and explicated its pros and cons. This paper also examined how discretion is a need of modern administrative dispensation and how to control its potential exploitation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
KERRI WACHTER
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
DAMIAN McNAMARA
Keyword(s):  

Praxis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 109 (14) ◽  
pp. 1141-1149
Author(s):  
Martina Boscolo Berto ◽  
Dominik C. Benz ◽  
Christoph Gräni

Abstract. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized countries. Assessment of symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive CAD is a common reason for a clinical visit. Noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging are established tools to rule-in and rule-out CAD, to assess the severity of disease and to determine the potential risk of future cardiovascular events. In this review, we discuss the updated Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology on Chronic Coronary Syndromes and explore the different imaging modalities used in current clinical practice for the noninvasive assessment of CAD. The pros and cons of each method, especially comparing anatomical and functional testing, are presented. Furthermore we we address the practical clinical aspects in the selection of the optimal noninvasive tests according to clinical need.


Author(s):  
Charles A. Peterson

Abstract. Content analysis is a late and contentious addition to the Rorschach canon. The determinants have ruled. Hermann Rorschach was at best, ambivalent about content analysis, focusing on the perceptual aspects of the process. Rorschachers have been not been conTENT about CONtent. The literature on the pros and cons and the how-to of content analysis is reviewed chronologically, concluding with eight issues and objections that have left Rorschach practitioners malcontent with content. Hoping to help practitioners improve the analysis of Rorschach content, ten suggestions, often with examples, are offered, these “hints” affecting both conceptualization and practice. A case fragment is appended to the review to host the above suggestions and to illustrate the (likely) less frequent “active evocation” of content to further the analysis.


1957 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-45
Author(s):  
ROGER M. BELLOWS
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-236
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Burish ◽  
Denise A. Matt

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Hitlan ◽  
M. Catherine DeSoto
Keyword(s):  

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 51 (30) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerina Bezrukova
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document