Life Cycle Cost and Benefit Analysis of Low Carbon Vehicle Technologies

Author(s):  
Neil Stephen Lopez ◽  
Jimwell Soliman ◽  
Jose Bienvenido Manuel Biona
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Václav Beran ◽  
Daniel Macek ◽  
Dana Měšťanová

Bridges create transport infrastructure and are subjected to long term witness of economic design, reliability, durability, maintainability and external risk (natural and human hazards). Deficient design of bridges points to high investment costs, low quality, retrofits maintenance costs, mitigates quality damages. The primary reason of the problem is usually stated high investment costs. Resources for investment are limited over and over again. However, approach for evaluating and comparing the cost effectiveness in practical design does not dominate in present-days as arbitration of different strategies and warrant for avoiding critical economic or functional situations. This paper illustrates a method for estimating the retrofits for bridges design based on Life-Cycle Costs and Cost-Benefit Analysis. The approach integrates cost model, fragility of as-designed and retrofitted benefits for a range of externalities and associated potential changes in design and economical retrofit. The emphasis on life-time performance and benefits, as opposed to initial retrofit acquisition investment cost alone, paves the way to risk-wise investment and also helps to support upgrade actions for sustainable infrastructure. An application of the holistic approach Life-Cycle Cost and benefit analysis is conducted for two representative bridges of highway class. The available financing has a big influence on the chosen technical design.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasitorn Srisawadi ◽  
◽  
Naraphorn Paoprasert ◽  
Prasit Wattanawongsakun ◽  
Sarawut Lerspalungsanti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Wilbur

Whole-building model optimizations have been performed for a single-detached house in 5 locations with varying climates, electricity emissions factors, and energy costs. The multi-objective optimizations determine the life-cycle cost vs. operational greenhouse gas emissions Pareto front to discover the 30-year life-cycle least-cost building design heated 1) with natural gas, and 2) electrically using a) central air-source heat pump, b) ductless mini-split heat pump c)ground-source heat pump, and d) electric baseboard, accounting for both initial and operational energy-related costs. A net-zero carbon design with grid-tied photovoltaics is also optimized. Results indicate that heating system type influences the optimal enclosure design, and that neither building total energy use, nor space heating demand correspond to GHG emissions across heating system types. In each location, at least one type of all-electric design has a lower life-cycle cost than the optimized gas-heated model, and such designs can mitigate the majority of operational GHG emissions from new housing in locations with a low carbon intensity electricity supply.


Author(s):  
Hong-Chan Chang ◽  
Jheng-Lun Jiang ◽  
Ruay-Nan Wu ◽  
Cheng-Chien Kuo ◽  
Tsung-Hsien Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document