An Assessment of Niching Methods and Their Applications

Author(s):  
Vivek Sharma ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Sanjay Tyagi
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Edgar Covantes Osuna ◽  
Dirk Sudholt

Abstract Niching methods have been developed to maintain the population diversity, to investigate many peaks in parallel and to reduce the effect of genetic drift. We present the first rigorous runtime analyses of restricted tournament selection (RTS), embedded in a (μ+1) EA, and analyse its effectiveness at finding both optima of the bimodal function TwoMax. In RTS, an offspring competes against the closest individual, with respect to some distance measure, amongst w (window size) population members (chosen uniformly at random with replacement), to encourage competition within the same niche. We prove that RTS finds both optima on TwoMax efficiently if the window size w is large enough. However, if w is too small, RTS fails to find both optima even in exponential time, with high probability. We further consider a variant of RTS selecting individuals for the tournament without replacement. It yields a more diverse tournament and is more effective at preventing one niche from taking over the other. However, this comes at the expense of a slower progress towards optima when a niche collapses to a single individual. Our theoretical results are accompanied by experimental studies that shed light on parameters not covered by the theoretical results and support a conjectured lower runtime bound.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Daniel Filip Duarte

Abstract In optimization tasks, it is interesting to achieve a set of efficient solutions instead of one single output, in the case the best solution is not suitable. Many niching methods offer a diversified response, yet some important problems are common: (1) The most interesting solutions of each local optimum are not identified. Thus, the output is the overall population of solutions, which increases the work of the designer in verifying which solution is the most interesting. (2) Existing niching algorithms tend to distribute the solutions on the most promising regions, over-populating some local optima and sub-populating others, which leads to poor optimization.To solve these challenges, a novel niching method is presented, named local optimum ranking 2 (LOR2). This sorting methodology favors the exploration of a defined number of local optima and ranks each local population by objective value within each local optimum. Thus, is performed a multi-focus exploration, with an equalized number of solutions on each local optimum, while identifying which solutions are the local apices. To exemplify its application, the LOR2 algorithm is applied in the design optimization of a metallic cantilever beam. It achieves a set of efficient and diverse design configurations, offering both performance and diversity for structural design challenges.In addition, a second experiment describes how the algorithm can be applied to segment the domain of any function, into a mesh of similar sized or custom-sized elements. Thus, it can significantly simplify metamodels and reduce their computation time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document