Sensitivity Analysis of Petrophysical Parameters Due to Fluid Substitution in a Sandstone Reservoir

Author(s):  
S. P. Maurya ◽  
N. P. Singh ◽  
Kumar Hemant Singh
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-Qin Liu ◽  
Huai-Shan Liu ◽  
Lei Xing ◽  
Zhi-Liang Qin ◽  
Ben-Jun Ma

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1180-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.A. Purnamasar ◽  
H. Khairy ◽  
A.L. Abdeldayem ◽  
W. Ismail

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. E41-E48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arturo Contreras ◽  
Carlos Torres-Verdín ◽  
Tim Fasnacht

This paper describes the successful application of amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) inversion of prestack-seismic amplitude data to detect and delineate deepwater hydrocarbon reservoirs in the central Gulf of Mexico. Detailed AVA fluid/lithology sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the nature of AVA effects in the study area based on well-log data. Standard techniques such as crossplot analysis, Biot-Gassmann fluid substitution, AVA reflectivity modeling, and numerical simulation of synthetic gathers were part of the AVA sensitivity analysis. Crossplot and Biot-Gassmann analyses indicate significant sensitivity of acoustic properties to fluid substitution. AVA reflectivity and angle-gather modeling indicate that the shale/sand interfaces represented by the top and base of the M-10 reservoir are associated with typical Class III AVA responses caused by relatively low-impedance gas-bearing sands. Consequently, prestack seismic inversion provided accurate and reliable quantitative information about the spatial distribution of lithology and fluid units within the turbidite reservoirs based on the interpretation of fluid/lithology-sensitive modulus attributes. From the integration of inversion results with analogous depositional models, the M-series reservoirs were interpreted as stacked terminal turbidite lobes within an overall fan complex. This interpretation is consistent with previous regional stratigraphic/depositional studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document