Orthostatic Hypotension and Associated Supine Hypertension

2021 ◽  
pp. 303-316
Author(s):  
Hyun-Yoon Ko ◽  
Sungchul Huh
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Romero-Ortuno ◽  
Matthew DL O’Connell ◽  
Ciaran Finucane ◽  
Christopher Soraghan ◽  
Chie Wei Fan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii14-ii18
Author(s):  
Q M N Rachel ◽  
K Mamun ◽  
M H Nguyen

Abstract Introduction Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy increases long term survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, radiotherapy of the carotid sinus or brain stem can evolve labile hypertension and orthostatic intolerance from chronic baroreflex failure. Diabetes would also cause this neuropathy. Management of patients with Supine hypertension-Orthostatic hypotension can be very challenging. Methods A case report was done on a 71-year-old man with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma status post radiation therapy who was admitted with severe supine hypertension-orthostatic hypotension. Patient was managed with both non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, and monitored for postural symptoms, complications of severe supine hypertension—which has been linked to left ventricular hypertrophy and kidney dysfunction, and placed on 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to aid in management so as to prevent hypertension induced organ damage. Results This review outlines the pathophysiology of Supine hypertension-Orthostatic hypotension, treatment complications and potential management strategies recommendations for this group of patients. It revealed the benefit of having a 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, which provides insight on the timing and magnitude of an individual’s blood pressure fluctuations throughout the day so as to further guide management. Conclusion Chronic baroreflex failure is a late sequela of neck irradiation for naso-pharyngeal carcinoma due to accelerated atherosclerosis in the region of the carotid sinus baroreceptor. Treatment goal is achieved with adequate control of pre-syncopal symptoms and prevention of long term complications. Non-pharmacological interventions remain the first line of therapy, followed by pharmacological interventions as necessary. Nonetheless, management of blood pressure in these elderly patients with baroreflex dysfunction remains challenging and should be individualized. Moving forward, a prospective study on the incidence of late onset, iatrogenic baroreflex failure as a late complication of neck irradiation and its particular relationship to carotid arterial rigidity should be conducted to increase awareness, timely diagnosis and management of the condition among physicians.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 1182-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack J. Chen ◽  
Yi Han ◽  
Jonathan Tang ◽  
Ivan Portillo ◽  
Robert A. Hauser ◽  
...  

Background: The comparative effects of droxidopa and midodrine on standing systolic blood pressure (sSBP) and risk of supine hypertension in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (NOH) are unknown. Objective: To perform a Bayesian mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis of droxidopa and midodrine in the treatment of NOH. Methods: The PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases were searched up to November 16, 2016. Study selection consisted of randomized trials comparing droxidopa or midodrine with placebo and reporting on changes in sSBP and supine hypertension events. Data were pooled to perform a comparison among interventions in a Bayesian fixed-effects model using vague priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation with Gibbs sampling, calculating pooled mean changes in sSBP and risk ratios (RRs) for supine hypertension with associated 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: Six studies (4 administering droxidopa and 2 administering midodrine) enrolling a total of 783 patients were included for analysis. The mean change from baseline in sSBP was significantly greater for both drugs when compared with placebo (droxidopa 6.2 mm Hg [95% CrI = 2.4-10] and midodrine 17 mm Hg [95% CrI = 11.4-23]). Comparative analysis revealed a significant credible difference between droxidopa and midodrine. The RR for supine hypertension was significantly greater for midodrine, but not droxidopa, when compared with placebo (droxidopa RR = 1.4 [95% CrI = 0.7-2.7] and midodrine RR = 5.1 [95% CrI = 1.6-24]). Conclusion and Relevance: In patients with NOH, both droxidopa and midodrine significantly increase sSBP, the latter to a greater extent. However, midodrine, but not droxidopa, significantly increases risk of supine hypertension.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose-Alberto Palma ◽  
Gabriel Redel-Traub ◽  
Angelo Porciuncula ◽  
Daniela Samaniego-Toro ◽  
Patricio Millar Vernetti ◽  
...  

Hypertension ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelangelo Sartori ◽  
Achille C. Pessina ◽  
Andrea Semplicini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document