Reselection of hard red winter wheat cultivar Lancota for high grain protein content

Euphytica ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-615
Author(s):  
L. M. Corpuz ◽  
G. M. Paulsen ◽  
E. G. Heyne ◽  
K. F. Finney
1990 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLES F. McGUIRE ◽  
LARRY G. BLACKWOOD

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grading standards for wheat places hard red spring and hard red winter (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) wheat into separate classes. One important criterion for this designation is kernel type. Because of genotypes being released by plant breeders in recent years, distinction between these two classes is difficult for grain graders. As a consequence some people in the grain industry favor placing both of these wheat types into one class. One hazard of this action is that end use properties of these two wheats, according to some industrial firms, is class dependent. We studied quality characteristics of five hard red spring and seven hard red winter wheat cultivars grown at the same three Montana locations in 5 different years to evaluate this concept. Analysis of variance indicated quality differences between classes for all traits except flour yields, which were similar for the two classes. Flour ash content, farinograph absorption, peak time, stability time, valorimeter, grain protein content, bake absorption, mix time, and loaf volume were all significantly higher for spring than winter wheats. These values were still higher for spring than winter wheats except for test weight when wheat protein content was the co-variate. Both statistical treatments show that hard red spring wheat flour has higher water absorption percent, longer dough mixing requirements, longer dough stability times, and higher loaf volumes than hard red winter wheat flour.Key words: Bread wheat quality, loaf volume, grain protein content, protein quality


Crops & Soils ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-58
Author(s):  
Ethan C. Wyatt ◽  
Jacob T. Bushong ◽  
Natasha E. Macnack ◽  
Jeremiah L. Mullock ◽  
Randy Taylor ◽  
...  

cftm ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. cftm2016.10.0068
Author(s):  
Ethan C. Wyatt ◽  
Jacob T. Bushong ◽  
Natasha E. Macnack ◽  
Jeremiah L. Mullock ◽  
Randy Taylor ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Graf ◽  
J. B. Thomas ◽  
B. L. Beres ◽  
D. A. Gaudet ◽  
A. Laroche ◽  
...  

Graf, R. J., Thomas, J. B., Beres, B. L., Gaudet, D. A., Laroche, A. and Eudes, F. 2012. Flourish hard red winter wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 183–189. Flourish is a hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) eligible for all grades of the Canada Western Red Winter wheat class. Compared with the check cultivars in the Western Winter Wheat Cooperative registration trials (CDC Osprey, AC Bellatrix, Radiant, CDC Buteo), Flourish produced similar grain yield with earlier maturity, shorter straw, improved lodging resistance and higher grain protein content. Flourish displayed winter survival similar to the checks. In the eastern prairie rust hazard region of Manitoba and eastern Saskatchewan, Flourish yielded about 5% more grain than CDC Buteo and CDC Falcon, cultivars that are well-adapted and widely grown in the region. Flourish exhibited intermediate resistance to stem and leaf rust combined with moderate resistance to stripe rust and common bunt, a unique combination of disease resistance traits for a western Canadian winter wheat cultivar.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie C. Rudd ◽  
Ravindra N. Devkota ◽  
Amir M. Ibrahim ◽  
Jason A. Baker ◽  
Shannon Baker ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Kariuki ◽  
H. Zhang ◽  
J. L. Schroder ◽  
J. Edwards ◽  
M. Payton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document