Increasing grain protein content of hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by mutation breeding

1983 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Corpuz ◽  
E. G. Heyne ◽  
G. M. Paulsen
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinbao YAO ◽  
Hongxiang MA ◽  
Xueming YANG ◽  
Miaoping ZHOU ◽  
Dan YANG

1990 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLES F. McGUIRE ◽  
LARRY G. BLACKWOOD

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grading standards for wheat places hard red spring and hard red winter (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) wheat into separate classes. One important criterion for this designation is kernel type. Because of genotypes being released by plant breeders in recent years, distinction between these two classes is difficult for grain graders. As a consequence some people in the grain industry favor placing both of these wheat types into one class. One hazard of this action is that end use properties of these two wheats, according to some industrial firms, is class dependent. We studied quality characteristics of five hard red spring and seven hard red winter wheat cultivars grown at the same three Montana locations in 5 different years to evaluate this concept. Analysis of variance indicated quality differences between classes for all traits except flour yields, which were similar for the two classes. Flour ash content, farinograph absorption, peak time, stability time, valorimeter, grain protein content, bake absorption, mix time, and loaf volume were all significantly higher for spring than winter wheats. These values were still higher for spring than winter wheats except for test weight when wheat protein content was the co-variate. Both statistical treatments show that hard red spring wheat flour has higher water absorption percent, longer dough mixing requirements, longer dough stability times, and higher loaf volumes than hard red winter wheat flour.Key words: Bread wheat quality, loaf volume, grain protein content, protein quality


2004 ◽  
Vol 90 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 311-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.J. Wang ◽  
J.H. Wang ◽  
L.Y. Liu ◽  
W.J. Huang ◽  
C.J. Zhao ◽  
...  

Crops & Soils ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-58
Author(s):  
Ethan C. Wyatt ◽  
Jacob T. Bushong ◽  
Natasha E. Macnack ◽  
Jeremiah L. Mullock ◽  
Randy Taylor ◽  
...  

Euphytica ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-615
Author(s):  
L. M. Corpuz ◽  
G. M. Paulsen ◽  
E. G. Heyne ◽  
K. F. Finney

cftm ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. cftm2016.10.0068
Author(s):  
Ethan C. Wyatt ◽  
Jacob T. Bushong ◽  
Natasha E. Macnack ◽  
Jeremiah L. Mullock ◽  
Randy Taylor ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Terasawa ◽  
Miwako Ito ◽  
Tadashi Tabiki ◽  
Koichi Nagasawa ◽  
Koichi Hatta ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 707-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Fowler

CDC Buteo is a hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar that is eligible for grades of the Canada Western Red Winter Wheat class. It is an intermediate height cultivar with moderate stem and leaf rust resistance and good winter hardiness and grain yield potential. It is adapted to the western Canadian prairies where its agronomic and disease package combined with an excellent grain quality profile has resulted in wide commercial acceptance in Saskatchewan. CDC Buteo was made the wheat quality standard for the Central Winter Wheat Co-operative Registration Trials in 2008.Key words: Triticum aestivum L., cultivar description, wheat (winter)


2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Thomas ◽  
R. J. Graf

Thomas, J. B. and Graf, R. J. 2012. AC Readymade and AC Tempest, selections from Redwin hard red winter wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 355–361. AC Readymade and AC Tempest are hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars selected from the Montana cultivar ‘Redwin’ to conform to the kernel visual distinguishability requirements of the Canada Western Red Winter (CWRW) wheat class. AC Readymade and AC Tempest were registered in 1991 and 1999, respectively, following 3 yr of testing in the Western Winter Wheat Cooperative registration trials relative to various checks including Winalta, Norstar, CDC Clair and CDC Osprey. The survival characteristics of these cultivars demonstrated that they were well-suited to the relatively mild winter climate of southern Alberta. In this region of the prairies, AC Tempest had 4% higher grain yield than AC Readymade and was not significantly different from the other checks except Winalta, which was lower yielding. Both cultivars displayed relatively late maturity, moderate height, exceptional straw strength, high test weight, large kernels, high grain protein content and moderate resistance to common bunt. AC Tempest had significantly higher flour yield than AC Readymade.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document