Acetylcholinesterase activity in the myotome of the early chick embryo

1982 ◽  
Vol 227 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinori Miki ◽  
Humio Mizoguti
1983 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Miki ◽  
E. Fujimoto ◽  
H. Mizoguti

Cells ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Serrado Marques ◽  
Vera Teixeira ◽  
António Jacinto ◽  
Ana Tavares

1948 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Schechtman

1988 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masao Nakamura ◽  
Takashi Kuwana ◽  
Yukihiko Miyayama ◽  
Toyoaki Fujimoto

Author(s):  
Hans-Georg Sydow ◽  
Tobias Pieper ◽  
Christoph Viebahn ◽  
Nikoloz Tsikolia

2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 449-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Hatakeyama ◽  
Kenji Shimamura

Development ◽  
1960 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-375
Author(s):  
P. H. S. Silver

It seems to be generally accepted that experimenting in ovo on the chick during the early stages of development (up to about 48 hours) is fraught with the greatest difficulty. After about this time no serious technical problems arise and a high proportion of successful results can be expected. It is natural to ask why there should be this change-over from extreme difficulty to reasonable simplicity. New (1955) attributed to this ‘inaccessibility of the chick embryo in the egg’ the invention of his own and many other in vitro methods during the last 30 years. There is no doubt that, when short-term experiments only are required, in vitro methods will probably always be preferred. But all in vitro methods suffer from the disadvantage that the embryo cannot be expected to survive for more than 48 hours or so after explantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document