Dynamic differentiation of GABAA-sensitive influences on orientation selectivity of complex cells in the cat striate cortex

1995 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Pfleger ◽  
A.B. Bonds
1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 512-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Wilson ◽  
S. M. Sherman

1. Receptive-field properties of 214 neurons from cat striate cortex were studied with particular emphasis on: a) classification, b) field size, c) orientation selectivity, d) direction selectivity, e) speed selectivity, and f) ocular dominance. We studied receptive fields located throughtout the visual field, including the monocular segment, to determine how receptivefield properties changed with eccentricity in the visual field.2. We classified 98 cells as "simple," 80 as "complex," 21 as "hypercomplex," and 15 in other categories. The proportion of complex cells relative to simple cells increased monotonically with receptive-field eccenticity.3. Direction selectivity and preferred orientation did not measurably change with eccentricity. Through most of the binocular segment, this was also true for ocular dominance; however, at the edge of the binocular segment, there were more fields dominated by the contralateral eye.4. Cells had larger receptive fields, less orientation selectivity, and higher preferred speeds with increasing eccentricity. However, these changes were considerably more pronounced for complex than for simple cells.5. These data suggest that simple and complex cells analyze different aspects of a visual stimulus, and we provide a hypothesis which suggests that simple cells analyze input typically from one (or a few) geniculate neurons, while complex cells receive input from a larger region of geniculate neurons. On average, this region is invariant with eccentricity and, due to a changing magnification factor, complex fields increase in size with eccentricity much more than do simple cells. For complex cells, computations of this geniculate region transformed to cortical space provide a cortical extent equal to the spread of pyramidal cell basal dendrites.


1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Malpeli

1. Injections of 4 mM cobaltous chloride were used to block synaptic transmission in layer A of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) without blocking fibers of passage going to or arising from other layers. 2. Selective inactivation of geniculate layer A virtually abolished all visual activity in cortical layers 4ab, 4c, and 6. Under these conditions, the stimulus-evoked response, orientation selectivity, and direction selectivity of cells in layers 2 and 3 were not seriously affected. In layer 5, the effects of the block were more variable, with special complex cells least affected and simple cells most affected. 3. Since the organization of complex receptive fields and the maintenance of normal orientation selectivity in supragranular layers survive disruption of major interlaminar interactions, it appears that much of the functional architecture of cat striate cortex does not depend on the integrity of the column. 4. These results support the idea that each layer of the LGN is a functional unit with a unique pattern of access to the various layers of visual cortex.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 8086-8094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Hirsch ◽  
Christine A. Gallagher ◽  
José-Manuel Alonso ◽  
Luis M. Martinez

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 2209-2221 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Marlin ◽  
R. Douglas ◽  
M. Cynader

1. Responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex were studied with flashed light slit stimuli. The responses to slits flashed in different positions in the receptive field were assessed quantitatively before and after periods of prolonged stimulation of one small region of the receptive field. This type of prolonged stimulation resulted in reduced responsivity over a limited zone within the complex cell receptive field. 2. The adaptation-induced responsivity decrement was generally observed in both the ON and OFF response profiles but could also be restricted to one or the other. In general, the magnitude of the response decrements was greatest in the ON response profiles. The adaptation-induced response decrement did not necessarily spread throughout the receptive field but was restricted to a small region surrounding the adapted receptive field position (RFP). Adaptation spread equally widely across the ON and OFF response profiles despite the smaller adaptation effects in the OFF profile. 3. The adaptation effects from repeated stimulation at a single RFP did not spread symmetrically across the receptive field, and a given cell's preferred direction of motion indicated the direction of the asymmetric spread of the adaptation. RFPs that would be stimulated by a light slit originating at the point of adaptation and moving in the preferred direction (preferred side) showed greater adaptation-induced response decrements than did RFPs that would be stimulated by a light slit moving in the opposite direction from the point of adaptation (nonpreferred side). There was significant enhancement of responses at some RFPs on the non-preferred side of the point of adaptation. This asymmetric spread of adaptation could be caused by adaptation of inhibitory connections that contribute to complex cell direction selectivity. 4. The asymmetry of adaptation was significantly different for the ON and OFF response profiles. The asymmetric spread of adaptation for the ON response profile was similar to that observed previously in simple cells with greater decrements in the preferred direction side of the point of adaptation. However, the OFF response profiles showed less directional asymmetry in the spread of adaptation and showed greater decrements at RFPs in the nonpreferred direction side of the point of adaptation. 5. The similarity between the spread of adaptation in simple and complex cells suggests that the adaptation in these cells is occurring through a common mechanism. The directional asymmetry of the spread of adaptation is likely due to a local postsynaptic mechanism of adaptation rather than presynaptic transmitter depletion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document