A new approach to the study of binocular interaction in visual cortex: Normal and monocularly deprived cats

1982 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R.D. Freeman ◽  
J.G. Robson
1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ohzawa ◽  
R. D. Freeman

We have studied the manner by which inputs from the two eyes are combined in simple cells of the cat's visual cortex. The stimuli for this study are drifting sinusoidal gratings, shown dichoptically at optimal spatial frequency and orientation. The relative spatial phase (disparity) between the gratings for left and right eyes is varied over 360 degrees. Most simple cells show phase-specific binocular interaction such that response amplitudes and phases vary depending on the relative spatial phase. At one phase, response is greater than either of the monocular responses and often greater than the sum of the two. At the phase 180 degrees away from the optimal, the cell's responses are strongly inhibited and often completely suppressed. Phase-specific binocular interaction disappears when the gratings presented to one eye are made orthogonal to the optimal orientation. The degree of binocular interaction does not depend critically on the ocular dominance of the cells. Simple cells that are nearly equally dominated by each eye always exhibit strong phase-specific interaction. The majority of cells that are strongly dominated by one eye, and even those that appear monocular, show phase-dependent changes in responses. We examined the extent of binocular interaction for cells with preferred orientations near vertical compared with those tuned to other optimal orientations. If these cells are conveying information about depth, one might expect a greater degree of binocular phase-specificity for units preferring nearly vertical orientations, which would then be processing horizontal disparities. We find no evidence for this. Predictions of simple-cell responses are derived from a linear model of binocular convergence in which light-evoked neural signals from each eye are summed linearly to determine cell responses. Data from cells generally follow the prediction of the model for both response amplitude and phase. Deviations from predictions of the linear model are found for a minority of cells. This deviation may be accounted for by a threshold mechanism that comes into play after the linear binocular summation. A small proportion of simple cells that appear monocular by alternate tests of each eye show a purely inhibitory influence from the silent eye. This inhibition is not generally dependent on the relative phase of the gratings. We conclude that most binocular interaction in striate simple cells may be accounted for by linear summation of neural signals from each eye.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


1979 ◽  
Vol 204 (1157) ◽  
pp. 477-484 ◽  

It is argued that those neural systems (such as that responsible for stereoscopic vision) that have the greatest precision of operation are the most likely, during their developmental construction, to take advantage of information supplied by their own input. There is evidence that binocuarly driven neurons in the kitten’s visual cortex do indeed become modified in their synaptic organization during early visual experience in a manner that enhances the specificity of binocular interaction and ensures that the ranges of positional and orientational disparities of the receptive fields, within limits, become matched to the nature of the actual stimulation encountered by the animal.


2001 ◽  
Vol 107 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 147-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Gonzalez ◽  
Rogelio Perez ◽  
Maria S. Justo ◽  
Carlos Ulibarrena

1993 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Paul Guillemot ◽  
Marie-Claude Paradis ◽  
Andre Samson ◽  
Maurice Ptito ◽  
Louis Richer ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ohzawa ◽  
R. D. Freeman

We have studied the manner by which inputs from the two eyes are combined in complex cells of the cat's visual cortex. The stimuli are drifting sinusoidal gratings presented dichoptically at optimal spatial frequency and orientation. The relative phase between the gratings for left and right eyes is varied over 360 degrees. Approximately 40% of complex cells show phase-specific binocular interaction where response amplitudes vary depending on the relative phase of the gratings shown to the two eyes. This interaction is similar to that observed for most simple cells. We devised a test to examine whether the phase-specific interaction in complex cells results from linear convergence of neural signals at subunits of the receptive fields. The data from this test are consistent with a linear combination model. The phase-specific binocular interaction data from complex cells imply that the optimal relative phase of the receptive field subunits is closely matched. Another type of complex cell, approximately 40% of the total, could be driven through either eye, but exhibited non-phase-specific responses to dichoptically presented gratings. This type of interaction is found only in complex cells. Binocularly non-phase-specific complex cells may have subunits whose optimal relative phases are random or monocular. The division of complex cells into these two major groups (binocularly phase specific and non-phase specific) is independent of whether they are standard or special complex-cell types. A small proportion (8%) of complex cells that appear monocular by alternate tests of each eye show a purely inhibitory influence from the silent eye. This inhibition is not generally dependent on the relative phase of the gratings. Unlike simple cells, complex cells are not a homogeneous group. However, nearly half of complex cells show phase-specific binocular interaction that is probably the result of linear convergence. Combined with the results from simple cells, the majority of binocular interaction in the striate cortex may be accounted for by linear summation of neural signals from each eye. This provides a simplified view of the nature of binocular interaction in the visual cortex.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document