The role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory

1995 ◽  
Vol 57 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Nyberg ◽  
Lars-G�ran Nilsson
Author(s):  
Ben R. Newell ◽  
Sally Andrews

Abstract. One interpretation of levels of processing effects (LOP) on priming in implicit tests of memory is in terms of deficits in lexical processing during shallow study tasks. In two experiments the extent of lexical processing engaged in during standard shallow encoding tasks was manipulated by placing the encoding question either before or after the target stimulus. Clear evidence was found in explicit memory tasks that placing the question after the target stimulus increased the depth of processing of words presented in shallow encoding tasks. In contrast, there was no evidence of such an effect on the priming observed in implicit memory tasks. The results suggest that the role of lexical processing in LOP effects on priming requires further specification.


Memory ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1026-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Concepción Padilla ◽  
Julia Mayas ◽  
Soledad Ballesteros ◽  
Pilar Andrés

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 418-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Müllensiefen ◽  
Andrea R. Halpern

We investigated how well structural features such as note density or the relative number of changes in the melodic contour could predict success in implicit and explicit memory for unfamiliar melodies. We also analyzed which features are more likely to elicit increasingly confident judgments of “old” in a recognition memory task. An automated analysis program computed structural aspects of melodies, both independent of any context, and also with reference to the other melodies in the testset and the parent corpus of pop music. A few features predicted success in both memory tasks, which points to a shared memory component. However, motivic complexity compared to a large corpus of pop music had different effects on explicit and implicit memory. We also found that just a few features are associated with different rates of “old” judgments, whether the items were old or new. Rarer motives relative to the testset predicted hits and rarer motives relative to the corpus predicted false alarms. This data-driven analysis provides further support for both shared and separable mechanisms in implicit and explicit memory retrieval, as well as the role of distinctiveness in true and false judgments of familiarity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document