Muscarinic agonists have no effect on spontaneous quantum transmitter release from frog motor nerve endings

1987 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-209
Author(s):  
E. E. Nikol'skii ◽  
�. A. Bukharaeva

1974 ◽  
Vol 187 (1087) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  

Non-heated rabbit serum causes massive transmitter release from motor nerve endings. The effect is not observed after heating the serum, in the way usually done to destroy complement. It seems that serum may be acting on the nerve terminals by a mechanism involving the complement system in the absence of antibody.



2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rachid Giniatullin ◽  
Serguey Grishin ◽  
Arthur Giniatullin






1989 ◽  
Vol 77 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 79-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Molg� ◽  
M. P�cot-Dechavassine ◽  
S. Thesleff


1978 ◽  
Vol 200 (1139) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  

β-Bungarotoxin (β-BuTX) induces twitching of innervated frog muscle and subsequently blocks transmitter release from motor nerve endings. These actions of β-BuTX are prevented if the nerve-muscle junctions are pretreated with a low concentration of phospholipase A 2 from bee venom. When the Ca 2+ in the external fluid is replaced by Sr 2+ , the phospho­lipase activity of β-BuTX is negligible and, in these conditions, β-BuTX causes a decrease in the amplitude of endplate potentials but does not go on to block transmitter release completely.





1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Wojtowicz ◽  
I. Parnas ◽  
H. Parnas ◽  
H. L. Atwood

Latency of release of individual quanta of transmitter was studied at neuromuscular junctions of a crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). Postsynaptic quantal currents were recorded at individual motor nerve endings with a macropatch electrode while the subterminal axon branch was depolarized by current passed through an intracellular microelectrode. For depolarizing currents of moderate size, the latency of transmitter release did not change when the duration of the depolarizing current was altered. Previous studies in which a contrary result was obtained may have been compromised by artefacts or by the sampling methods employed. The present results do not support the hypothesis of a depolarization-induced "repressor" of quantal release.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document