The relationship of abuse and witnessing violence on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory with black adolescents

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha R. Miller ◽  
Paul J. Handal ◽  
Frank H. Gilner ◽  
John F. Cross
2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiya Kawamura ◽  
Yukie Takahashi ◽  
Tsuyoshi Akiyama ◽  
Tsukasa Sasaki ◽  
Masako Kako

Author(s):  
Joel S. Milner ◽  
John R. Charlesworth ◽  
Ruth G. Gold ◽  
Steven R. Gold ◽  
Merle R. Friesen

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 706-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla K. M. Lo ◽  
Ko Ling Chan ◽  
Patrick Ip

Extant evidence has shown that insecure adult attachment is related to dysfunctional parenting styles that heighten parents’ risk of child maltreatment. However, there is a lack of studies appraising the evidence for the association between insecure adult attachment and child maltreatment. This meta-analytic study examined the relationship between parents’ adult attachment and child maltreatment perpetration/child abuse potential. Studies examining the relationship between parents’ adult attachment and child maltreatment/child abuse potential published before February 2017 were identified through a systematic search of online databases. In total, 16 studies ( N = 1,830) were selected. Meta-analysis based on random-effects models shows a significant positive association between insecure attachment and child maltreatment (pooled effect size: odds ratio [ OR] = 2.93, p = .000). Subgroup analyses show insecure attachment was more strongly associated with failure to thrive ( OR = 8.04, p = .000) and filicide ( OR = 5.00, p < .05). Medium effect sizes were found for subgroup analyses on insecure romantic attachment ( OR = 3.76, p = .000), general attachment ( OR = 3.38, p = .000), attachment to own child ( OR = 3.13, p = .001), and to own parents ( OR = 2.63, p = .000) in relation to child maltreatment.


1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Robertson ◽  
Joel S. Milner

Three studies describe the development and initial validation of an inconsistency scale for the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Study 1 ( N = 100) describes the construction of an inconsistency scale and provides preliminary norm values. Study 2 ( N = 133) provides replication of the results reported in Study 1, while Study 3 ( N = 32) provides data on construct validity indicating the inconsistency scale can discriminate between individuals instructed to respond honestly and those instructed to respond in an inconsistent, incongruous manner.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Ondersma ◽  
Mark J. Chaffin ◽  
Sharon M. Mullins ◽  
James M. LeBreton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document