Nomadism with a difference: Deleuze's legacy in a feminist perspective

Man and World ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosi Braidotti
Keyword(s):  
Feminist Perspective

A Multicultural Feminist Perspective of the Reconstructed Masculinity Construct

1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1139-1141
Author(s):  
Carlton Parks
Keyword(s):  
Feminist Perspective

How a Feminist Perspective Can Transform Psychology

2000 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-178
Author(s):  
Bernice Lott
Keyword(s):  
Feminist Perspective

What Makes Groups Therapeutic? A Feminist Perspective on Group Psychotherapy

1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 1024-1025
Author(s):  
Michael P. Farrell
Keyword(s):  
Group Psychotherapy ◽  
Feminist Perspective

Feminist perspective of Toni Morrison in “The Bluest Eye

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Ruchee Aggarwal ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Toni Morrison ◽  
Feminist Perspective ◽  
Bluest Eye

The Body of the Gurus: Sikh Scripture from a Contemporary Feminist Perspective

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikky-Guninder Kaur Singh
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  
Feminist Perspective

The Ethical Dimension of Work: A Feminist Perspective

Hypatia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Gürtler
Keyword(s):  
Feminist Perspective ◽  
Ethical Dimension

The Unfortunate Misinterpretation of Miss Follett

Public Voices ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Stout ◽  
Jeannine M Love
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Social Worker ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Public Intellectual ◽  
Feminist Perspective ◽  
Process Ontology ◽  
Forthcoming Book ◽  
Relational Process

Mary Follett was both a woman in public service in myriad roles from social worker to presidential advisor and a female public intellectual giving voice to what would later be called a feminist perspective. Based on a forthcoming book, this paper summarizes the fullness of Follett’s thinking and discusses the manner in which she is frequently misinterpreted in the literature, arguing that these misunderstandings are due to a lack of awareness of, or ability to grasp, her underlying relational process ontology. Misinterpretations in both the management and public administration literature are considered, ending with a call for scholars in both specializations to reconsider their interpretations from a more in-depth understanding of her work.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document