An investigation of the anion-exchange resin method for soil phosphate extraction

1978 ◽  
Vol 50 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 305-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Sibbesen
Soil Systems ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Zhe Li ◽  
Suwei Xu ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Yuji Arai

The process of phosphate desorption from soils is difficult to measure using stirred batch techniques because of the accumulation of desorbed ions in a bathing solution. To accurately measure the apparent rate coefficient of phosphate desorption from soils, it is necessary to remove the desorbed ions. In this study, a novel hybrid (i.e., iron oxide coated) anion exchange resin was used as a sink to study long-term (seven days) P desorption kinetics in intensively managed agricultural soils in the Midwestern U.S. (total phosphorus (TP): 196–419 mg/kg). The phosphate desorption kinetics in the hybrid anion exchange resin method were compared with those in the other conventional batch desorption method with pure anion exchange resins or without any sink. The extent of P desorption in the hybrid resin methods was >50% of total desorbed phosphate in the other methods. The initial kinetic rate estimated in the pseudo-second-order kinetic model was also highest (3.03–31.35 mg/(g·hr)) in the hybrid resin method when the same soil system was compared. This is because adsorbed P in the hybrid resins was nearly irreversible. The hybrid anion exchange resin might be a new and ideal sink in measuring the P desorption process in soils and sediments.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwann Le Gendre ◽  
Erwan Martin ◽  
Benoit Villemant ◽  
Pierre Cartigny ◽  
Nelly Assayag

1978 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erkki Aura

Phosphorus uptake by oats in pot experiments was compared with phosphorus test values obtained for experimental soils. Phosphorus was extracted from the soil using acid ammonium acetate solution, Bray 1 solution, Olsen solution, ammonium fluoride, distilled water and anion exchange resin. Intensity values were determined by equilibrating the soils with 0.01 M CaCl2 solution. Soil samples were collected from 30 mineral soils. The best test for phosphorus status proved to be the anion exchange resin method. Good results were also obtained with simple water extraction. An advantage of the water and resin method is that the microstructure of the soil is not substantially changed when using these methods. An intensity measurement was not in itself sufficient for analysis of the phosphorus status, since the intensity drops rapidly when soil releases phosphorus.


Soil Science ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. HISLOP ◽  
I. J. COOKE

Soil Science ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 308-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. COOKE ◽  
J. HISLOP

1978 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-345
Author(s):  
Erkki Aura

An attempt was made to clarify the mechanisms of phosphate desorption using the anion exchange resin method for extraction of phosphorus from soil. It was shown that there is a linear dependence between the amount of phosphorus desorbed and the square root of the desorption time. Through theoretical examination it was concluded that the above-mentioned relation between the desorption and time is a result of the diffusion of phosphate from porous soil medium. Using this interpretation of the desorption curve as a basis, the activation energy of the phosphate desorption was calculated from the experimental results obtained with resin extraction at different temperatures. The activation energy values were 32—64 kJ/mol depending on soils involved. In application of the results, the mechanisms and rate at different steps of the desorption were examined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document