Relativistic and retardation corrections to photon-nucleon absorption sum rules in the constituent-quark model

1996 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-424
Author(s):  
M. De Sanctis
2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gorchtein ◽  
D. Drechsel ◽  
M. M. Giannini ◽  
E. Santopinto ◽  
L. Tiator

1993 ◽  
Vol 08 (22) ◽  
pp. 2135-2140 ◽  
Author(s):  
FELIX SCHLUMPF

We derive the electric and magnetic form factors of the neutron in the framework of a relativistic constituent quark model. Our parameter free prediction agrees well with a recent, accurate measurement. The relativistic features of the model and the specific form of the wave function are essential for the result. Comparisons are made to other models based on vector meson dominance, perturbative QCD and QCD sum rules.


Author(s):  
M. Gorchtein ◽  
D. Drechsel ◽  
M. Giannini ◽  
E. Santopinto

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. 77-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gorchtein ◽  
D. Drechsel ◽  
M. Giannini ◽  
E. Santopinto

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1771-1782 ◽  
Author(s):  
W L Wang ◽  
F Huang ◽  
Z Y Zhang ◽  
Y W Yu ◽  
F Liu

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (24) ◽  
pp. 4519-4535 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. MIRJALILI ◽  
K. KESHAVARZIAN

Sea quark distributions in the NLO approximation, based on the phenomenological valon model or constituent quark model are analyzed. We use the parametrized inverse Mellin transform technique to perform a direct fit with available experimental data and obtain the unknown parameters of the distributions. We try to extend the calculation to the NLO approximation for the singlet and nonsinglet cases in DIS phenomena. We do also the same calculation for electron–positron annihilation. The resulting sea distributions are effectively independent of the process used. The approach of complete RG improvement (CORGI) is employed and the results are compared with the standard approach of perturbative QCD in the [Formula: see text] scheme with a physical scale. The comparisons with data are in good agreement. As is expected, the results in the CORGI approach indicate a better agreement to the data than the NLO calculation in the standard approach.


2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M Giannini ◽  
E Santopinto ◽  
A Vassallo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document