X-ray diagnosis of duodenal ulcer (II) double contrast method with application of adequate compression

1968 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
N. Miyake
1969 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
T. Uchida ◽  
T. Saito ◽  
N. Komata ◽  
M. Hasegawa ◽  
Y. Asakawa ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
T F Solanke ◽  
K Kumakura ◽  
M Maruyama ◽  
N Someya

1968 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
A. Kotaka ◽  
Y. Tsuchiya ◽  
A. Hashimoto ◽  
S. Inoue ◽  
S. Shida ◽  
...  

1971 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 293-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Pacsoo ◽  
W. B. James

The radiological and clinical diagnoses in 622 patients submitted to barium enema examination have been compared. A conventional technique was used in 315 cases and double contrast in the remaining 307. Though the two groups are not strictly comparable, it is probable that the double contrast method is more accurate in diagnosing both pathology and normality. It is suggested that double contrast barium enema should be the method of choice in radiological examination of the colon.


1961 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solve Welin ◽  
Folke Brahme

1970 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Kawai ◽  
Yoshihiro Kohli ◽  
Takeo Fujisawa

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 770-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pal Lörinc ◽  
Folke Brahme

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document