ELEVATED SERUM DIGOXIN LEVELS ARE NOT ALWAYS PRESENT IN DIGOXIN TOXICITY

InPharma ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 383 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-13
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1011-1012
Author(s):  
DAVID S. OLANDER ◽  
MICHAEL MAURER

In their recent communication, Johnson et al suggested that conventional digoxin use may be sufficiently toxic forlow-birth-weight infants to prompt consideration of alternative therapies. This conclusion was supported by their detection of digitalis associated illness in 9/18 small premature infants receiving digoxin in doses of 0.003 to 0.005 mg/kg twice per day. The documentation of abnormally elevated serum digoxin concentrations in 7/9 patients further supports the possibility of clinically significant digoxin toxicity. Akin to the findings of Berman et al and Pinsky et al, this investigation only confirms the observation that overdosage of infants with digoxin may result in digitoxicity.


1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 246-249
Author(s):  
Augustine S. Aruna ◽  
Sandra G. Jue

Objective: To report a case of digoxin immune Fab (DIF) administration following an unexplained increase in serum digoxin concentration in an asymptomatic patient with chronic renal failure. Case Summary: A 70-year-old man presented to the hospital with congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic renal failure, and suspected digoxin toxicity. By day 3, he developed a more stable cardiac rhythm with nodal beats. His last known digoxin dose was 12 hours prior to admission. No explanation for an elevated serum digoxin concentration 48 hours after admission could be found. Despite absence of other signs of digoxin toxicity, DIF 80 mg iv was administered, and was immediately followed by 40 mg. Discussion: This case illustrates that elevated digoxin concentrations may be observed in patients with renal failure. These may not be true high concentrations because of the following potential factors: (1) the presence of digoxin-like factors, (2) increased biotransformation of digoxin, and (3) accumulation of metabolites that interfere with the assay. Digoxin metabolites are known to cross-react with the antibodies in commonly used digoxin immunoassays, and may be inappropriately interpreted to signal digoxin toxicity. Both the accuracy and reliability of digoxin immunoassay techniques have been questioned or challenged over the years. It is difficult to determine whether a reported toxic serum digoxin concentration represents the true concentration or cross-reactivity between digoxin metabolites and antibodies used in most digoxin immunoassays. Data Sources: Data collection sources included retrospective review of patient medical records, personal contact with one of the physicians involved in rendering patient care for interpretation of the electrocardiogram changes, clinical symptoms and rationale for DIF administration, and contact with the immunoassay technologist, who indicated that the fluorescence polarization immunoassay technique was used for analysis of digoxin concentrations. The medical literature then was reviewed. Conclusions: DIF should be reserved for use in symptomatic patients. Elevated digoxin concentrations must be evaluated for various factors that can cause falsely elevated values. Clinical signs and symptoms are critical in making the decision to use Fab. Antidotal measures should be based on correlation of patient symptoms with serum digoxin concentrations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 2119
Author(s):  
Saadat Aleem ◽  
Mohammed Al-Sadawi ◽  
Roger Fan

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 864-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Nawarskas ◽  
David M. McCarthy ◽  
Sarah A. Spinier

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of digoxin toxicity thought to be secondary to clarithromycin therapy. CASE SUMMARY: A 78-year-old white woman with congestive heart failure taking digoxin 0.25 mg po qd presented to our hospital with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. She had taken clarithromycin 500 mg po bid for 3 days, and a serum digoxin concentration obtained the day of admission was 4.4 μg/L. An electrocardiogram (ECG) done on admission revealed ST segment changes consistent with digoxin effect and later asymptomatic, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). Clarithromycin was discontinued and digoxin was withheld at admission, resulting in the resolution of symptoms, ECG abnormalities, and NSVT on day 3 of hospitalization. On day 5 her serum digoxin concentration was 1.5 μg/L and digoxin therapy was reinstituted at a dose of 0.125 mg/d po. DISCUSSION: This is the fourth published case implicating clarithromycin as the cause of digoxin toxicity. This interaction is most likely due to clarithromycin eradication of digoxinmetabolizing gut flora, thereby increasing digoxin bioavailability. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 10% of patients are thought to be extensive presystemic metabolizers of digoxin and may therefore be most susceptible to a drug interaction with clarithromycin. Serum digoxin concentrations in such patients should be monitored closely during clarithromycin therapy.


1987 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Gervais ◽  
Amin A. Nanji ◽  
Donald C. Greenway ◽  
William Mclean

Falsely elevated serum digoxin values have recently been reported in patients with liver disease. Since not all patients have circulatory digoxin-like immunoreactive substance (DLIS) in their serum, we compared the clinical and laboratory findings in patients with and without DLIS. Thirty-two patients with liver disease were studied. The only parameter that was significantly different in the two groups was serum bilirubin. In the group of patients with DLIS, significant correlations were obtained between DLIS and bilirubin and DLIS and creatinine. We postulate that increased levels of DLIS in serum are due to an abnormality of DLIS excretion.


BMJ ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 286 (6371) ◽  
pp. 1089-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Sonnenblick ◽  
A S Abraham ◽  
Z Meshulam ◽  
U Eylath

1980 ◽  
Vol 14 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 547-548
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Powell

A case of digoxin toxicity occurring in a patient with stable renal function and serum digoxin levels of 0.6–0.9 ng/ml is discussed. The patient is a 62-year-old black male admitted to the hospital with a chief complaint of shortness of breath. The patient's problem list included: (1) congestive heart failure, (2) coronary artery disease, (3) adult-onset diabetes mellitus, (4) cerebral vascular accident, (5) fever, and (6) anemia. The patient complained of a poor appetite and “sour stomach” while on digoxin. Serum electrolytes were normal, and the serum creatinine was essentially stable with a range of 1.2–1.6 mg% reported. Despite the “apparent” therapeutic serum digoxin levels, a probable diagnosis of digoxin toxicity was made, and the patient responded within two days of the dechallenge with improvement in the nausea and anorexia. The limitations and problems in assessing digoxin toxicity with serum digoxin levels are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document