scholarly journals Evaluation of Single and Mixed Verbal Operant Arrangements for Teaching Mands and Tacts

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina M. Sidener ◽  
James E. Carr ◽  
Amanda M. Karsten ◽  
Jamie M. Severtson ◽  
Carly E. Cornelius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1969 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Drennen ◽  
William Gallman ◽  
Gene Sausser




2006 ◽  
pp. 185-226
Author(s):  
B. F. Skinner




1961 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don E. Dulany


1970 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
William F. Oakes


1964 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor J. Cieutat

Two studies concerned effects of sex of Ss, sex of E, positive vs negative reinforcement (i.e., attention vs inattention), and time trends, on the conditioning and extinction of participation in structured and unstructured small group discussions. Previous results indicated reinforcement is effective only when administered by an E of the same sex as Ss. Present results did not support this expectation and also were not consistent with each other. Exp. I was partly consistent with expectation only when E was male; no conditioning was obtained by female Es. For Exp. II only the female E produced conditioning. Extinction effects in both experiments were inconsistent with expectation. In an earlier study (Cieutat, 1962) and in both Exps. I and II the same four factors were evaluated with some design modification, and were found to interact complexly and significantly ( p < .01, < .10, < .10, respectively). These interactions between sex of E, sex of Ss, reinforcement, and time, though significant in three independent evaluations, were so because of different trends in each case. These differences are discussed in terms of uncontrolled personality differences between Es and Ss.



1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 875-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. William Miller

The general relationship of awareness to learning efficiency was investigated in a 2 × 2 factorial design with 20 Ss in each of four groups. Classical conditioning of meaning and verbal operant conditioning procedures were studied under two sets of instructions: one stated vague experimental purposes and the other, exact purposes. Ss' awareness of experimental procedures and purposes was measured Results indicated that with both classical and operant conditioning change in meaning occurred without awareness by Ss. A classical conditioning explanation of change in meaning was supported, but an operant conditioning explanation of change in terms of response frequency was not strengthened.



1989 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunita Gupta ◽  
A. P. Shukla


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document