A categorical interpretation of partial function logic and Hoare logic

Author(s):  
P. M. W. Knijnenburg ◽  
F. Nordemann
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-146
Author(s):  
Peter Knijnenburg ◽  
Frank Nordemann

In this paper we provide a categorical interpretation of the first-order Hoare logic of a small programming language by giving a weakest precondition semantics for the language. To this end, we extend the well-known notion of a (first-order) hyperdoctrine to include partial maps. The most important new aspect of the resulting partial (first-order) hyperdoctrine is a different notion of morphism between the fibres. We also use this partial hyperdoctrine to give a model for Beeson's Partial Function Logic such that (a version of) his axiomatization is complete with respect to this model. This shows the usefulness of the notion, independent of its intended use as a model for Hoare logic.



2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164
Author(s):  
Ievgen Ivanov ◽  
Artur Korniłowicz ◽  
Mykola Nikitchenko

Summary In the paper we give a formalization in the Mizar system [2, 1] of the rules of an inference system for an extended Floyd-Hoare logic with partial pre- and post-conditions which was proposed in [7, 9]. The rules are formalized on the semantic level. The details of the approach used to implement this formalization are described in [5]. We formalize the notion of a semantic Floyd-Hoare triple (for an extended Floyd-Hoare logic with partial pre- and post-conditions) [5] which is a triple of a pre-condition represented by a partial predicate, a program, represented by a partial function which maps data to data, and a post-condition, represented by a partial predicate, which informally means that if the pre-condition on a program’s input data is defined and true, and the program’s output after a run on this data is defined (a program terminates successfully), and the post-condition is defined on the program’s output, then the post-condition is true. We formalize and prove the soundness of the rules of the inference system [9, 7] for such semantic Floyd-Hoare triples. For reasoning about sequential composition of programs and while loops we use the rules proposed in [3]. The formalized rules can be used for reasoning about sequential programs, and in particular, for sequential programs on nominative data [4]. Application of these rules often requires reasoning about partial predicates representing preand post-conditions which can be done using the formalized results on the Kleene algebra of partial predicates given in [8].



2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 847-856
Author(s):  
Shengbing Ren ◽  
Xiang Zhang

The problem of synthesizing adequate inductive invariants lies at the heart of automated software verification. The state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for synthesizing invariants have gradually shown its excellent performance. However, synthesizing disjunctive invariants is a difficult task. In this paper, we propose a method k++ Support Vector Machine (SVM) integrating k-means++ and SVM to synthesize conjunctive and disjunctive invariants. At first, given a program, we start with executing the program to collect program states. Next, k++SVM adopts k-means++ to cluster the positive samples and then applies SVM to distinguish each positive sample cluster from all negative samples to synthesize the candidate invariants. Finally, a set of theories founded on Hoare logic are adopted to check whether the candidate invariants are true invariants. If the candidate invariants fail the check, we should sample more states and repeat our algorithm. The experimental results show that k++SVM is compatible with the algorithms for Intersection Of Half-space (IOH) and more efficient than the tool of Interproc. Furthermore, it is shown that our method can synthesize conjunctive and disjunctive invariants automatically



2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kensuke Kojima ◽  
Atsushi Igarashi
Keyword(s):  




2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernie Cohen ◽  
Dexter Kozen
Keyword(s):  


Author(s):  
Andrew W. Appel ◽  
Robert Dockins ◽  
Aquinas Hobor ◽  
Lennart Beringer ◽  
Josiah Dodds ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document