Cleft-Lift Operation for Pilonidal Sinuses Under Tumescent Local Anesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study of Peri- and Postoperative Pain

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 895-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Anders Bertelsen
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Tumescent Local Anesthesia ◽  
Cleft Lift

scholarly journals Predictive Factors of Postoperative Pain and Postoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Elective Circumcision: A Prospective Cohort Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Zavras ◽  
Stella Tsamoudaki ◽  
Vasileia Ntomi ◽  
Ioannis Yiannopoulos ◽  
Efstratios Christianakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Prospective Cohort

scholarly journals Comparison of Postoperative Pain between Patients who underwent Primary and Repeated Caesarean Section: A Prospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyou Duan ◽  
Guiying Yang ◽  
Jing Peng ◽  
Zhenxin Duan ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section

Abstract Background: The presences of differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primipara who underwent a primary cesarean section and multipara who underwent first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible difference in postoperative pain between primipara and multipara. Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out, and only women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia were included. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was performed for all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen, and the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion, and loading dose of 1 mL with a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as visual analogue scale ≥40 during the postoperative 48 hours. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses on postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. Results: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primipara and 101 multipara) were included. The relative risk for multipara to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primipara. In patients under 30 years old, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain in the multipara was higher than that on the primipara (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P=0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multipara and primipara (33.7%vs.40.2%, P=0.381). No difference was found in PCIA consumption between two groups. (111.1 ± 36.0mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3mL, P=0.979) Additionally, a significantly higher incidence of pain at 4 weeks after the surgery was noted in the primipara compared to the multipara (62.2%vs.37.7%, P=0.011). Conclusions: Multipara who underwent first repeat cesarean section have lower risk to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 hours after surgery compared to primipara. While multipara under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain.

scholarly journals Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyou Duan ◽  
Guiying Yang ◽  
Jing Peng ◽  
Zhenxin Duan ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section

Abstract Background The differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primiparas who underwent a primary cesarean section and multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible differences in postoperative pain between primiparas and multiparas. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed only including women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen; the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion with a loading dose of 1 mL and a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale score ≥ 40 during 48 h post-operation. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses in postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. Results From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primiparas and 101 multiparas) were included. The relative risk for multiparas to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primiparas. In patients aged < 30 years, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain was higher in multiparas than in primiparas (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multiparas and primiparas (33.7% vs. 40.2%, P = 0.381). No difference was found in PCIA use between the two groups (111.1 ± 36.0 mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3 mL, P = 0.979). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of pain was noted 4 weeks post-surgery in primiparas than that in multiparas (62.2% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.011). Conclusion Multiparas who underwent their first repeat cesarean section have a lower for inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 h after surgery than primiparas. Multiparas aged under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain. Trail Registration ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03009955, Date registered: December 30, 2016.

scholarly journals Comparison of Postoperative Pain between Patients who underwent Primary and Repeated Caesarean Section: A Prospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyou Duan ◽  
Guiying Yang ◽  
Jing Peng ◽  
Zhenxin Duan ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section

Abstract Background: The presences of differences in post-operative pain are unclear between the primipara who underwent a primary cesarean section and multipara who underwent first repeat cesarean section. The study aimed to explore the possible difference in postoperative pain between primipara and multipara. Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out, and only women who underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia were included. Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was performed for all subjects with 0.2 mg/kg hydromorphone and 4 mg/kg flurbiprofen, and the pump was programmed as 2.0 mL/h background infusion, and loading dose of 1 mL with a lockout period of 15 min. Postoperative incision and visceral pain intensity were evaluated using visual analogue scale, and inadequate analgesia was defined as visual analogue scale ≥40 during the postoperative 48 hours. Additionally, the patients’ pain statuses on postoperative week 1 and week 4 were also assessed during follow-up via telephone. Results: From January to May 2017, a total of 168 patients (67 primipara and 101 multipara) were included. The relative risk for multipara to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.74) compared to primipara. In patients under 30 years old, inadequate analgesia on visceral pain in the multipara was higher than that on the primipara (RR, 3.56 [1.05 to 12.04], P=0.025). There was no significant difference in the combined incidence of inadequate analgesia in both types of pain between the multipara and primipara (33.7%vs.40.2%, P=0.381). No difference was found in PCIA consumption between two groups. (111.1 ± 36.0mL vs. 110.9 ± 37.3mL, P=0.979) Additionally, a significantly higher incidence of pain at 4 weeks after the surgery was noted in the primipara compared to the multipara (62.2%vs.37.7%, P=0.011). Conclusions: Multipara who underwent first repeat cesarean section have lower risk to experience inadequate analgesia on incision pain during the first 48 hours after surgery compared to primipara. While multipara under 30 years may be more prone to experiencing postoperative inadequate analgesia on visceral pain.

scholarly journals Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gotler ◽  
B. Bar-Gil ◽  
M. Ashkenazi
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Root Canal Treatment

scholarly journals The Cold Pressor Test as a Predictor of Prolonged Postoperative Pain, a Prospective Cohort Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron MacLachlan ◽  
Edward A. Shipton ◽  
J. Elisabeth Wells
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Cold Pressor Test ◽  
Cold Pressor ◽  
Pressor Test

scholarly journals Effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative pain on patients undergoing elective surgery: Prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. 103190
Author(s):  
Muhiddin Tadesse ◽  
Siraj Ahmed ◽  
Teshome Regassa ◽  
Timsel Girma ◽  
Seyoum Hailu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Preoperative Anxiety

Assessment of postoperative analgesic effect of rectus sheath block for patients who had emergency midline laparatomy, in University of Gondar Compressive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: an observational prospective cohort study.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wubie Birlie Chekol ◽  
Hailu Yimer Tawuye ◽  
zewuditu abdissa denu ◽  
Abatneh Feleke agegnehu
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Analgesic Effect ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Rectus Sheath ◽  
Exposed Group ◽  
Analgesic Consumption ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Rectus Sheath Block

Abstract Background : Postoperative pain is a major concern after midline abdominal surgeries. Rectus sheath block (RSB) has been indicated after midline laparatomy ; however, the analgesic effect of landmark technique on postoperative pain was not well investigated. Objectives: we tested the hypothesis that RSB reduces pain scores, decreased total analgesic consumption and prolong first analgesic request time after emergency midline laparatomy . Methods : Prospective cohort study was done from February 1 to May 10, 2018. Eighty eight patients were observed in this study, 44 in the RSB group and 44 in the non exposed group. Pain severity was assessed in first 24 hours postoperative period in terms of total analgesic consumption, first analgesic request time and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 1 hour , 2 hours , 4 hours , 6 hours , 8 hours , 10 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours. Results : The RSB group had significantly reduced VAS score at rest and on movement at (1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours), but not at (10, 12 and 24 hours) point assessed. Patients in RSB group had reduced tramadol requirement compared to non exposed group in 24 hours (255.68±80.13) VS (314.77±97.40), P=0.003). The 24 hours diclofenac consumption was significantly lowered in RSB group (75 ( 75-150) than non exposed group (150 ( 75-150), P=0.031.Mean time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in RSB group (372.95±131.41) than non exposed group (50.34±14.12), p≤0 . 001). Conclusions : The RSB group resulted in less pain scores, reduced total analgesic utilization and stayed for longer time for first analgesic request. Therefore we recommend RSB as part of multimodal analgesia after emergency midline laparatomy. Keywords: midline abdominal surgery, rectus sheath block, abdominal field block

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document