scholarly journals Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Concomitant Intracranial Hemorrhage

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes M. Weller ◽  
Julius N. Meissner ◽  
Sebastian Stösser ◽  
Franziska Dorn ◽  
Gabor C. Petzold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Abstract Purpose Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are standard of care in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Data on MT in patients with intracranial hemorrhage prior to intervention is limited to anecdotal reports, as these patients were excluded from thrombectomy trials. Methods We analyzed patients from an observational multicenter cohort with acute ischemic stroke and endovascular treatment, the German Stroke Registry—Endovascular Treatment trial, with intracranial hemorrhage before MT. Baseline characteristics, procedural parameters and functional outcome at 90 days were analyzed and compared to a propensity score matched cohort. Results Out of 6635 patients, we identified 32 patients (0.5%) with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion and preinterventional intracranial hemorrhage who underwent MT. Risk factors of intracranial hemorrhage were head trauma, oral anticoagulation and intravenous thrombolysis. Overall mortality was high (50%) but among patients with a premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0–2 (n = 15), good clinical outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days was achieved in 40% of patients. Periprocedural and outcome results did not differ between patients with and without preinterventional intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusion Preinterventional intracranial hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion is rare. The use of MT is technically feasible and a substantial number of patients achieve good clinical outcome, indicating that MT should not be withheld in patients with preinterventional intracranial hemorrhage.

scholarly journals Intra-Arterial Adjunctive Medications for Acute Ischemic Stroke During Mechanical Thrombectomy

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1192-1202
Author(s):  
Vanessa H.E. Chen ◽  
Grace K.H. Lee ◽  
Choon-Han Tan ◽  
Aloysius S.T. Leow ◽  
Ying-Kiat Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: In patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the role of intra-arterial adjunctive medications (IAMs), such as urokinase, tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator), or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has not been clearly established. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concomitant or rescue IAM for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion patients undergoing MT. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register databases from inception until March 13, 2020. We analyzed all studies with patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior or posterior circulation that provided data for the two treatment arms, (1) MT+IAM and (2) MT only, and also reported on at least one of the following efficacy outcomes, recanalization and 90-day modified Rankin Scale, or safety outcomes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Data were collated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Sixteen nonrandomized observational studies with a total of 4581 patients were analyzed. MT only was performed in 3233 (70.6%) patients, while 1348 (29.4%) patients were treated with both MT and IAM. As compared with patients treated with MT alone, patients treated with combination therapy (MT+IAM) had a higher likelihood of achieving good functional outcome (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03–1.24]) and a lower risk of 90-day mortality (risk ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72–0.94]). There was no significant difference in successful recanalization (risk ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.99–1.06]) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.87–1.46]). Conclusions: In acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the use of IAM together with MT may achieve better functional outcomes and lower mortality rates. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of IAM as adjunctive treatment to MT.

scholarly journals Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Large Vessel Occlusion With COVID-19

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 2540-2543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Escalard ◽  
Benjamin Maïer ◽  
Hocine Redjem ◽  
François Delvoye ◽  
Solène Hébert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Onset ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Neurological Improvement ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Background and Purpose: Higher rates of strokes have been observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but data regarding the outcomes of COVID-19 patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) are lacking. We report our initial experience in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with LVO in patients with COVID-19. Methods: All consecutive patients with COVID-19 with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO treated in our institution during the 6 first weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak were included. Baseline clinical and radiological findings, treatment, and short-term outcomes are reported. Results: We identified 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 treated for an acute ischemic stroke due to LVO. Eight were men, with a median age of 59.5 years. Seven had none or mild symptoms of COVID-19 at stroke onset. Median time from COVID-19 symptoms to stroke onset was 6 days. All patients had brain imaging within 3 hours from symptoms onset. Five patients had multi-territory LVO. Five received intravenous alteplase. All patients had mechanical thrombectomy. Nine patients achieved successful recanalization (mTICI2B-3), none experienced early neurological improvement, 4 had early cerebral reocclusion, and a total of 6 patients (60%) died in the hospital. Conclusions: Best medical care including early intravenous thrombolysis, and successful and prompt recanalization achieved with mechanical thrombectomy, resulted in poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Although our results require further confirmation, a different pharmacological approach (antiplatelet or other) should be investigated to take in account inflammatory and coagulation disorders associated with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Individualized intravenous thrombolytic strategy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion on the era of mechanical thrombectomy: cases report

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 605-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Xing ◽  
Hongjian Shen ◽  
Zifu Li ◽  
Pengfei Yang ◽  
Yongwei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

AbstractIntravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h after the onset of symptoms has become a standard therapy that is recommended by many trials and clinical guidelines. As on the era of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions, whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is still necessary, and how to choose the optimal dose are still controversy. Here, we reported two cases of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions that both achieved complete recanalization after IVT. Then, IVT was terminated in advance, and dynamic surveillance by DSA was performed to achieve individual treatment. However, both of the cases presented with hemorrhagic transformation. We analyzed the probable reasons and put forward thoughts from ourselves.

Abstract 106: Safety and Efficacy of Sonothrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: International Collaborative Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Aristeidis H Katsanos ◽  
Jürgen Eggers ◽  
Vincent Larrue ◽  
Lars Thomassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

Introduction: Conflicting evidence has been published regarding the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis (sonothrombolysis) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Methods: We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sonothrombolysis with or without addition of microspheres (treatment group) to intravenous thrombolysis alone (control group) in AIS patients with LVO. Results: We included 6 in total RCTs that enrolled 1077 AIS patients. A total of 138 and 134 confirmed LVO patients were randomized to treatment and control groups respectively (median age 68 years, 58% men, median baseline NIHSS score 16). Patients randomized to sonothrombolysis had increased odds of complete recanalization compared to patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis alone (40.3% vs. 22.4%; OR=2.30, 95%CI: 1.05-5.02; adjusted OR=2.33, 95%CI: 1.02-5.34). They also tended to have increased odds of any (complete or partial recanalization (66.4% vs. 53.0%; OR=1.78, 95%CI: 0.95-3.33; adjusted OR=1.85, 95%CI: 0.97-3.53). The likelihood of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between the two groups (7.3% vs. 3.7%, OR=2.52, 95%CI: 0.77-8.29; adjusted OR=2.55, 95%CI: 0.76-8.52). No differences in the likelihood of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR: 1.30, 95%CI: 0.38-4.39), three-month mortality (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95%CI: 0.25-6.05), three-month favorable functional outcome (mRS-scores of 0-1; adjusted OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 0.64-3.19) and three-month functional independence (mRS-scores of 0-2; adjusted OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 0.77-2.64) were documented. Conclusion: Sonothrombolysis was associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of complete recanalization compared to intravenous thrombolysis alone in AIS patients with LVOs. Further study of the safety and efficacy of sonothrombolysis is warranted.

scholarly journals Current treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Vojvodina

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 459-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeljko Zivanovic ◽  
Aleksandra Lucic ◽  
Biljana Radovanovic ◽  
Svetlana Ruzicka-Kaloci ◽  
Mirjana Jovicevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Therapeutic Modality ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Acute ischemic stroke is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the world. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator remains the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke for any patient presenting within 4.5 hours from symptom onset. However, it is more effective and safe when treatment starts early. This therapy for acute ischemic stroke has been administered in Vojvodina since 2008. Various factors influence the outcome after intravenous thrombolysis. Timely recanalization and reperfusion is associated with better clinical outcomes. Mechanical Thrombectomy - a New Therapeutic Modality for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Nevertheless, the rate of recanalization and favorable outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion are low after intravenous thrombolysis. In such patients mechanical thrombectomy has demonstrated significantly higher rates of recanalization and improved outcomes compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone. This endovascular reperfusion therapy began to be implemented in Vojvodina in 2016. Conclusion. Intravenous thrombolysis continues to play a key role in the treatment of all acute ischemic stroke patients, but mechanical thrombectomy should be the ?gold standard? in the cases with large vessel occlusion.

scholarly journals Dabigatran Reversal Before Intravenous Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1616-1619 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Beharry ◽  
Michael J. Waters ◽  
Roy Drew ◽  
John N. Fink ◽  
Duncan Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Background and Purpose— Reversal of dabigatran before intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke has been well described using alteplase but experience with intravenous tenecteplase is limited. Tenecteplase seems at least noninferior to alteplase in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion. We report on the experience of dabigatran reversal before tenecteplase thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Methods— We included consecutive patients with ischemic stroke receiving dabigatran prestroke treated with intravenous tenecteplase after receiving idarucizumab. Patients were from 2 centers in New Zealand and Australia. We reported the clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and their functional outcome. Results— We identified 13 patients receiving intravenous tenecteplase after dabigatran reversal. Nine (69%) were male, median age was 79 (interquartile range, 69–85) and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 (interquartile range, 4–21). Atrial fibrillation was the indication for dabigatran therapy in all patients. All patients had a prolonged thrombin clotting time (median, 80 seconds [interquartile range, 57–113]). Seven patients with large vessel occlusion were referred for endovascular thrombectomy, 2 of these patients (29%) had early recanalization with tenecteplase abrogating thrombectomy. No patients had parenchymal hemorrhage or symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. Favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) occurred in 8 (62%) patients. Two deaths occurred from large territory infarction. Conclusions— Our experience suggests intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase following dabigatran reversal using idarucizumab may be safe in selected patients with acute ischemic stroke. Further studies are required to more precisely estimate the efficacy and risk of clinically significant hemorrhage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document