scholarly journals Robotic hernia repair

Der Chirurg ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich A. Dietz ◽  
O. Yusef Kudsi ◽  
Miguel Garcia-Ureña ◽  
Johannes Baur ◽  
Michaela Ramser ◽  
...  

AbstractThe principle of targeted separation or weakening of individual components of the abdominal wall to relieve tension in the median line during major abdominal reconstruction has been known for over 30 years as anterior component separation (aCS) and is an established procedure. In search of alternatives with lower complication rates, posterior component separation (pCS) was developed; transversus abdominis release (TAR) is a nerve-sparing modification of pCS. With the ergonomic resources of robotics (e.g., angled instruments), TAR can be performed in a minimally invasive manner (r-TAR): hernia gaps of up to 14 cm can be closed and a large extraperitoneal mesh implanted. In this video article, the treatment of large incisional hernias using the r‑TAR technique is presented. Exemplary results of a cohort study in 13 consecutive patients are presented. The procedure is challenging, but our own results—as well as reports from the literature—are encouraging. The r‑TAR is becoming the pinnacle procedure for abdominal wall reconstruction.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel W. Ross ◽  
B. Todd Heniford ◽  
Vedra A. Augenstein

Truly complex hernias which are multiply recurrent, have active infections, loss of domain, presence of stomas, require component separation or panniculectomy, and/or have other exacerbating factors, are truly challenging to manage operatively, and the multidisciplinary operations to repair them have become known collectively as abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Component separation techniques and panniculectomy, to name a few, have become commonly used techniques for operative management for complex hernias. Herein, we describe the history and technical aspects of component separation, panniculectomy and other adjunct techniques in abdominal wall reconstruction. In particular, a focus on patient specific clinical outcomes such as hernia recurrence, wound complications, and quality of life has been made in regards to use and types of component separation. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive review of the state of the literature and our recommendations for AWR, for the Plastic, General, and Hernia surgeon alike. This review contains 7 figures, 1 video, 1 table, and 79 references. Keywords: ventral hernia repair, incisional hernia, abdominal wall reconstruction. component separation, transversus abdominis release (TAR), surgical site infection, advances in hernia repair, robotic hernia repair, robotic component separation, botulinum toxin


2020 ◽  
pp. 155335062091419
Author(s):  
Jorge Daes ◽  
Joshua S. Winder ◽  
Eric M. Pauli

Many experts in abdominal wall reconstruction believe that the combination of simultaneous ipsilateral anterior component separation (ACS) and posterior component separation (PCS) is contraindicated. We performed ipsilateral endoscopic ACS and either endoscopic or open PCS-transversus abdominis release (TAR) in 5 fresh cadaver models. The full length of the semilunar line and the lateral abdominal wall remained well reinforced by 2 complete layers, comprising the internal oblique (IO) and TA muscles and their investing fasciae. Myofascial releases occurred 4 cm (median) apart. Additionally, we reviewed computed tomography images at 1 month and 1 year after PCS-TAR in 17 patients (30 PCS-TARs). Lateral displacement of the TA relative to the rectus abdominis (RA) was significant only at the superior mesenteric artery level, where it was <1 cm (median). Muscle mass changed minimally over time. Several studies showed that abdominal wall reconstruction after PCS-TAR results in compensatory muscular hypertrophy of the RA, external oblique (EO), and IO muscles and provides better quality of life and improved core physiology. These changes did not occur when the midline was not restored. Theoretically, endoscopic ACS-EO may be added to PCS-TAR to avoid partially bridged mesh repair in patients in whom complete midline restoration is impossible via PCS-TAR alone. Nevertheless, we advise most surgeons to perform a small-bridged repair instead of risking increased morbidity by attempting a highly complicated procedure.


2020 ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Anirban Bhunia ◽  
Soumyajyoti Panja

BACKGROUND: In ventral hernia repair, closure of the defect is one of the most significant challenges, especially in a wide defect, large hernias with loss of domain, and recurrent hernias. Posterior component separation with transverses abdominis muscle release (TAR) is a novel approach that offers a solution for complex ventral hernias. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness of posterior abdominal wall components separation with transversus abdominis muscle release (PCS-TAR) in the management of ventral abdominal hernia with loss of domain. METHOD: The posterior component separation by transversus abdominis muscle release (simply TAR) is a modification of the Rives-Stoppa procedure which combines it with developing of a large retro-muscular/pre-peritoneal plane and a consistent medial advancement of the abdominal wall musculature and accompanying fascia. This preserves the neurovascular bundles innervating the medial abdominal wall. Mesh is placed in a sublay fashion above the posterior layer. In an overwhelming majority of patients, the linea alba is reconstructed, creating a functional abdominal wall with wide mesh reinforcement. RESULT: We used this procedure in a case of large median ventral incisional hernia. Our patient was a known post-operative case of exploratory laparotomy for ileal perforation following blunt abdominal trauma. Ileostomy was done due to gross intraperitoneal contamination. His post-operative recovery was complicated by wound dehiscence previously. Patient presented with a hernia along the midline wound with a gap of 12*7 cm. After the abdominal wall reconstruction procedure (TAR) with mesh placement over posterior rectus sheath (15*20cm) his post op recovery was uneventful. There was no recurrence till follow up of 3 months. CONCLUSION: TAR seems to be the effective approach for complex hernias with good immediate outcomes.


Hernia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lopez-Monclus ◽  
J. Muñoz-Rodríguez ◽  
C. San Miguel ◽  
A. Robin ◽  
L. A. Blazquez ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The closure of midline in abdominal wall incisional hernias is an essential principle. In some exceptional circumstances, despite adequate component separation techniques, this midline closure cannot be achieved. This study aims to review the results of using both anterior and component separation in these exceptional cases. Methods We reviewed our experience using the combination of both anterior and posterior component separation in the attempt to close the midline. Our first step was to perform a TAR and a complete extensive dissection of the retromuscular preperitoneal plane developed laterally as far as the posterior axillary line. When the closure of midline was not possible, an external oblique release was made. A retromuscular preperitoneal reinforcement was made with the combination of an absorbable mesh and a 50 × 50 polypropylene mesh. Results Twelve patients underwent anterior and posterior component separation. The mean hernia width was 23.5 ± 5. The majority were classified as severe complex incisional hernia and had previous attempts of repair. After a mean follow-up of 27 months (range 8–45), no case of recurrence was registered. Only one patient (8.33%) presented with an asymptomatic bulging in the follow-up. European Hernia Society’s quality of life scores showed a significant improvement at 2 years postoperatively in the three domains: pain (p = 0.01), restrictions (p = 0.04) and cosmetic (p = 0.01). Conclusions The combination of posterior and anterior component separation can effectively treat massive and challenging cases of abdominal wall reconstruction in which the primary midline closure is impossible to achieve despite appropriate optimization of surgery.


Author(s):  
Sharbel A. Elhage ◽  
Matthew N. Marturano ◽  
Tanushree Prasad ◽  
Paul D. Colavita ◽  
Kent W. Kercher ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document