The impact of a diagnosis of personality disorder on service usage in an adult Community Mental Health Team

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Byrne ◽  
S. Henagulph ◽  
R. J. McIvor ◽  
J. Ramsey ◽  
J. Carson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health Team ◽  
Service Usage ◽  
Mental Health Team ◽  
Health Team ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Psychiatric admission for homeless people: the impact of a specialist community mental health team

1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 260-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Commander ◽  
Sue Odell ◽  
Sashi Sashidharan
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Homeless People ◽  
Discharge Process ◽  
Community Mental Health Team ◽  
Psychiatric Admission ◽  
Mental Health Team ◽  
Health Team ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

The difficulty in achieving good quality community mental health care for homeless people has received increasing attention during the last few years. Less consideration has been given to the provision of inpatient care. By comparing data collected before and after its inception, we examined the impact of a specialist community mental health team for homeless people on ‘no fixed abode’ admissions in Birmingham. Although the team was successfully involved in the admission and discharge process in a substantial proportion of cases, many admissions still took place out of hours and involved the police, while discharge was often against medical advice and occurred without follow-up. These findings and their implications for the provision of homeless services are discussed.

scholarly journals The clinical complexity of cases of schizophrenia in a community mental health team: a 3 year comparison

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S340-S340
Author(s):  
Shay-Anne Pantall ◽  
Laxsan Karunanithy ◽  
Hayley Boden ◽  
Lisa Brownell
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
List Type ◽  
Community Mental Health Team ◽  
Service Usage ◽  
Care Programme ◽  
Mental Health Team ◽  
Health Team ◽  
Long Acting

AimsTo describe the changes in complexity and management of individuals with schizophrenia in a community mental health team (CMHT) over a three year period.BackgroundIt is often believed that individuals receiving care from CMHTs are those with low levels of complexity and risk, and are relatively stable, with more complex individuals being managed by assertive outreach or other specialist teams. Here, we describe changes in the complexity, comorbidity, service-usage and management, of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a CMHT between 2016 and 2019.MethodData were collected from an electronic patient record system (RiO) for all individuals with schizophrenia in a CMHT in Birmingham (n = 84 in 2016, n = 71 in 2019), examining demographic variables, comorbidity, use of mental health services and current management.ResultKey findings included: - •63% were managed through care programme approach (CPA) in 2016, compared to only 31% in 2019.•21% had required home treatment or inpatient care in the preceding 12 months in 2016; this had improved to 8.5% in 2019.•Significant levels of psychiatric comorbidity, including addictions with almost half of patients (46.5%) having a known history of substance use in 2019, compared to only 15.5% noted in 2016.•Pharmacological management has remained broadly similar; in 2016 21% patients were taking a combination of 2 antipsychotics compared to only 10% in 2019 and 25% were taking clozapine in 2016 (21% in 2019). 39% were prescribed a long acting antipsychotic injection in 2016, compared to 32% in 2019.•In 2016, medication was being prescribed in the majority of cases within secondary care (55%) patients and in primary care in only 21%. GPs have now taken on greater prescribing responsibility in 2019, prescribing in 44% of cases, with 47% being prescribed by the CMHT.ConclusionThe acuity and management of individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia under the care of a CMHT has changed over a 3 year period. It is positive to note the reduced use of crisis services and lower rates of polypharmacy. There is a reduction in the proportion of patients receiving management through CPA, and a move towards more medication being prescribed in primary care. The reasons for this change are however unclear and may reflect change in available resources, given that more than half of this group receive clozapine or long acting injections, and have high levels of comorbidity.

scholarly journals Do recovery outcome measures improve clinical practice? A linguistic analysis of the impact of the Hope, Agency and Opportunity measure in community mental health teams

2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-107
Author(s):  
A Bowen ◽  
T Maguire ◽  
K Newman-Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Linguistic Analysis ◽  
Community Mental Health Team ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Team ◽  
Health Team ◽  
The Impact

Aims: Recovery approaches are identified as the overarching framework for improving mental health services for people with severe and enduring conditions. These approaches prioritise living well with long-term conditions, as evidenced by personal recovery outcomes. There is little research demonstrating how to support busy mental health teams, work in this way. This study assessed the impact of introducing a brief measure of recovery, the Hope, Agency and Opportunity (HAO), on the attitudes and behaviours of staff working in community mental health teams, to test whether routine use of such measures facilitates recovery-based practice. Methods: Linguistic analysis assumes that language is indicative of wider attitudes and behaviours. Anonymised clinical notes recorded by community mental health team clinicians were analysed for recovery and non-recovery language, over 30 months. This covered periods before, during and after the introduction of the recovery measure. We used a single-case design ( N = 1 community mental health team) and hypothesised that clinicians would use recovery-focused language more frequently, and non-recovery-focused language less frequently, following the introduction of the measure, and that these changes would be maintained at 18-month follow-up. Results: Visual inspection of the data indicated that recovery-focused language increased following the introduction of the HAO, though this was not maintained at follow-up. This pattern was not supported by statistical analyses. No clear pattern of change was found for non-recovery-focused language. Conclusions: The introduction of a brief measure of recovery may have influenced staff attitudes and behaviours temporarily. Any longer term impact is likely to depend on ongoing commitment to the use of the measure, without which staff language, attitudes and behaviours return to previous levels.

scholarly journals Use of psychotropic medication among psychiatric out-patients with personality disorder

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Baker-Glenn ◽  
Mark Steels ◽  
Chris Evans
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Psychotropic Medication ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Total Annual Cost ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Community Mental Health Team ◽  
Mental Health Team ◽  
Health Team

Aims and methodThis survey was conducted to ascertain the use of psychotropic medication in the treatment of patients with a primary diagnosis of personality disorder within a community mental health team. A sample of 113 patients were identified, their notes were reviewed, and details of current medications and diagnoses recorded.ResultsFour-fifths of patients were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication. The most commonly prescribed medication class was antidepressant, comprising almost half of prescriptions. The total annual cost across 107 patients was £37 000.Clinical implicationsMedication is commonly prescribed to people with personality disorder but more needs to be known about why prescriptions are started and stopped, what the benefits are, and how these are judged by patients and care teams.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document