Continuous density-based topology optimization of cracked structures using peridynamics

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 2375-2389 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sohouli ◽  
A. Kefal ◽  
A. Abdelhamid ◽  
M. Yildiz ◽  
A. Suleman
2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1645-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan Kefal ◽  
Abdolrasoul Sohouli ◽  
Erkan Oterkus ◽  
Mehmet Yildiz ◽  
Afzal Suleman

Author(s):  
Kai Liu ◽  
Andrés Tovar ◽  
Emily Nutwell ◽  
Duane Detwiler

This work introduces a multimaterial density-based topology optimization method suitable for nonlinear structural problems. The proposed method consists of three stages: continuous density distribution, clustering, and metamodel-based optimization. The initial continuous density distribution is generated following a synthesis strategy without penalization, e.g., the hybrid cellular automaton (HCA) method. In the clustering stage, unsupervised machine learning (e.g., K-means clustering) is used to optimally classify the continuous density distribution into a finite number of clusters based on their similarity. Finally, a metamodel (e.g., Kriging interpolation) is generated and iteratively updated following a global optimization algorithm (e.g., genetic algorithms) to ultimately converge to an optimal material distribution. The proposed methodology is demonstrated with the design of multimaterial stiff (minimum compliance) structures, compliant mechanisms, and a thin-walled S-rail structure for crashworthiness.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinling Liu ◽  
S. Jack Hu ◽  
Jingxia Yuan

Abstract This paper proposes a new approach to fixture configuration optimization. This approach is based on the concept of topology optimization of mechanical structures. Unlike existing techniques of fixture configuration optimization, this approach yields the optimal fixture topology by optimizing the fixture material distribution in a design domain, which surrounds the workpiece to be supported. Two methods, discrete density method and continuous density method, are used to optimize fixture topology. Application examples are given to validate these methods and to further illustrate the idea of fixture topology optimization. Compared with existing fixture configuration optimization techniques, the approach presented in this paper optimizes the fixture topology, rather than the number and/or placement of locators.


2017 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-253
Author(s):  
Hidenori Sasaki ◽  
Hajime Igarashi

2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
pp. 568-575
Author(s):  
Yusuke Sakamoto ◽  
Daisuke Ishizuka ◽  
Tetsuya Matsuda ◽  
Kazuhiro Izui ◽  
Shinji Nishiwaki

2020 ◽  
Vol 140 (12) ◽  
pp. 858-865
Author(s):  
Hidenori Sasaki ◽  
Yuki Hidaka ◽  
Hajime Igarashi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document