scholarly journals Higher frequency of osteoarthritis in patients with ACL graft rupture than in those with intact ACL grafts 30 years after reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 2139-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Söderman ◽  
Marie-Louise Wretling ◽  
Mari Hänni ◽  
Christina Mikkelsen ◽  
Robert J. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Knee

Abstract Purpose The aim was to assess the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction regarding graft failure, knee laxity, and osteoarthritis (OA) from a longterm perspective. It was hypothesized that intact ACL graft reduces the risk for increased OA development. Methods The cohort comprised 60 patients with a median follow-up 31 (range 28–33) years after ACL reconstruction. They were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, KT-1000 arthrometer and the pivot shift test. Results Out of the 60 patients, 30 (50%) showed an intact ACL graft and 30 (50%) a ruptured or absent ACL graft. Patients with ruptured ACL grafts had more medial tibiofemoral compartment OA than those with an intact ACL graft (p = 0.0003). OA was asymmetric in patients with ruptured ACL grafts with more OA in the medial than in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment (p = 0.013) and the patellofemoral compartment (p = 0.002). The distribution of OA between compartments was similar in patients with an intact ACL graft. KT-1000 values of anterior knee laxity were higher in patients with ruptured compared to those with intact ACL grafts (p = 0.012). Side-to-side comparisons of anterior knee laxity showed higher KT-1000 values in patients with ruptured ACL graft (p = 0.0003) and similar results in those with intact graft (p = 0.09). The pivot shift grade was higher in the group with a ruptured ACL graft (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Median 31 (range 28–33) years after ACL reconstruction, 50% of the patients showed an intact ACL graft and no side-to-side difference regarding anterior knee laxity. Patients with ruptured ACL grafts had more OA of the medial tibiofemoral compartment than those with intact ACL grafts. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Effect of Tibial Tunnel Placement Using the Lateral Meniscus as a Landmark on Clinical Outcomes of Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199967
Author(s):  
Kadir Büyükdoğan ◽  
Michael S. Laidlaw ◽  
Michael A. Fox ◽  
Michelle E. Kew ◽  
Mark D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Plateau ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Posterior Group ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Knee

Background: It remains unclear if use of the lateral meniscus anterior horn (LMAH) as a landmark will produce consistent tunnel positions in the anteroposterior (AP) distance across the tibial plateau. Purpose: To evaluate the AP location of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction tibial tunnels utilizing the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark and to examine how tunnel placement affects knee stability and clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 98 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts between March 2013 and June 2017. Patients with unilateral ACL injuries and a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in the study. All guide pins for the tibial tunnel were placed using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark. Guide pins were evaluated with the Bernard-Hertel grid in the femur and the Stäubli-Rauschning method in the tibia. Patients were divided by the radiographic location of the articular entry point of the guide pin with relation to the anterior 40% of the tibial plateau. Outcomes were evaluated by the Marx Activity Scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Anterior knee laxity was evaluated using a KT-1000 arthrometer and graded with the objective portion of the IKDC form. Rotational stability was evaluated using the pivot-shift test. Results: A total of 60 patients were available for follow-up at a mean 28.6 months. The overall percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel was 39.3% ± 3.8% (mean ± SD; range, 31%-47%). Side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity was significantly lower in the anterior group than the posterior group (1.2 ± 1.1 mm vs 2.5 ± 1.3 mm; P < .001; r = 0.51). The percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel demonstrated a positive medium correlation with side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity as measured by a KT-1000 arthrometer ( r = 0.430; P < .001). The anterior group reported significantly better distribution of IKDC grading as compared with the posterior group (26 grade A and 6 grade B vs 15 grade A and 13 grade B; P = .043; V = 0.297). The pivot-shift test results and outcome scores showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intraoperative landmark yields a wide range of tibial tunnel locations along the tibial plateau, with anterior placement of the tibial tunnel leading toward improved anterior knee stability.

scholarly journals Revision ACL Reconstruction - A retrospective failure analysis with a mean follow up of 35 months

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0030
Author(s):  
Lena Alm ◽  
Matthias Krause ◽  
Karl-Heinz Frosch ◽  
Ralph Akoto
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Knee Instability ◽  
Medial Knee ◽  
Risk Of Failure ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Anterior Knee

Aims and Objectives: While patients following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery show satisfying results, the outcome after revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) seems to be less favourable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients after revision ACLR. We hypothesize that peripheral knee instabilities and further concomitant lesions are risk factors for failure of revision ACLR. Furthermore, we hypothesize that peripheral stabilisation will reduce the risk of failure. Materials and Methods: Between 2013 and 2016, 111 patients with revision ACLR (revision surgery after primary ACL reconstruction) were included in the retrospective study. All patients were clinically examined with a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery (mean 35 months) and identified as “failed revision ACLR” (side-to-side difference greater than 5mm and/or pivot-shift grade 2/3) and “stable revision ACLR”. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate whether certain predisposing factors were associated with increased odds of failure of the revision ACLR. Results: Failure after revision ACLR occurred in 14.5% (n=16) of the cases. Preoperative medial knee instability (n=36) was associated with failure of revision ACLR, thus patients had a 17 times greater risk of failure when medial knee instability was diagnosed preoperatively. Also, the risk of failure was reduced when patients had peripheral medial (n=24) and/ or antero-lateral stabilisation (n=51). Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS, n=11 greater than 12°) and high-grade anterior knee laxity (side-to-side-difference greater than 5 mm and/or pivot-shift grade 3, n=41) were associated with failed revision ACLR. Furthermore, patients had a 9 times greater risk of failure when they were obese (BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, n=30). Also, postoperative functional scores in comparison to preoperative scores were shown to be significantly higher (Lysholm 85±27 vs. 51±31.9, p=0.024; Tegner 6.5± 1.3 vs. 4± 2.6, p=0.015). Conclusion: Results following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are less favourable than primary ACLR. Peripheral medial knee instability, high-grade anterior knee laxity, increased PTS and high BMI are risk factors for failure in revision ACLR while additional medial and/or antero-lateral stabilisation reduces the risk of failure.

scholarly journals Effect of Time on MRI Appearance of Graft After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparison of Autologous Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Grafts

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596712110235
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Panos ◽  
Brian M. Devitt ◽  
Julian A. Feller ◽  
Haydn J. Klemm ◽  
Timothy E. Hewett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Quadriceps Tendon ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Tendon Grafts ◽  
Anterior Knee ◽  
Hamstring Grafts

Background: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), changes in the appearance of the ACL graft can be monitored using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the MRI signal intensity (SI) of hamstring and quadriceps tendon grafts during the first postoperative year after ACLR. As a secondary aim, the relationship of SI to clinical and anatomic measurements was analyzed. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 78 patients who underwent ACLR with an autologous graft were reviewed; 55 received hamstring grafts and 23 received quadriceps tendon grafts. At 3 and 9 months postoperatively, 3-T MRI was performed using a dedicated knee coil, and the median SI of the intra-articular ACL graft was measured on sagittal-plane images. Postoperative lateral radiographs were analyzed to determine medial and lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS). Side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity between injured and uninjured limbs was measured at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: The median SI of quadriceps grafts was significantly greater than hamstring grafts at 3 months after ACLR ( P = .02). Between 3 and 9 months, the median SI of quadriceps grafts decreased ( P < .001), while that of hamstring grafts did not significantly change ( P = .55). The lateral PTS was significantly correlated with median SI measurements at 3 and 9 months such that greater lateral PTS values were associated with greater median SI. The side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity decreased for the quadriceps group ( P = .04) between 6 and 12 months but did not change for the hamstring group ( P = .88). Conclusion: The median SI of quadriceps grafts significantly decreased on MRI between 3 and 9 months after ACLR, while the median SI of hamstring grafts did not significantly change. The change in MRI appearance of the quadriceps grafts was paralleled by a reduction in anterior knee laxity between 6 and 12 months after surgery. In the absence of standardized imaging techniques and imaging analysis methods, the role of MRI in determining graft maturation, and the implications for progression through rehabilitation to return to sport, remain uncertain.

scholarly journals Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis in revision ACL reconstruction does not influence the outcome of patients with low-grade anterior knee laxity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Eggeling ◽  
T. C. Drenck ◽  
J. Frings ◽  
M. Krause ◽  
Alexander Korthaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Limited Evidence ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Total Failure ◽  
Anterior Knee

Abstract Introduction There is limited evidence on the indications of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in revision ACLR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the LET in patients with revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity. Methods Between 2013 and 2018, 78 patients who underwent revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity [≤ 5 mm side-to-side difference (SSD)] were included in the retrospective cohort study. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 23 patients during revision ACLR and patients were clinically examined with a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery. Postoperative failure of the revision ACLR was defined as SSD in Rolimeter® testing ≥ 5 mm or pivot-shift grade 2/3. Results In total, failure of the revision ACLR occurred in 11.5% (n = 9) of the cases at a mean follow-up of 28.7 ± 8.8 (24–67) months. Patients with an additional LET and revision ACLR did not show a significantly reduced failure rate (13% vs. 11%) or an improved clinical outcome according to the postoperative functional scores or pain in regards to patients with an isolated revision ACLR (Tegner 5.7 ± 1.3 vs. 5.9 ± 1.5, n.s.; IKDC 77.5 ± 16.2 vs. 80.1 ± 14.9, n.s., Lysholm 81.9 ± 14.2 vs. 83.8 ± 14.5, n.s.; VAS 1.9 ± 2.2 vs. 1.2 ± 1.7, n.s.). Conclusions An additional LET in patients with revision ACLR with low-grade anterior knee laxity does not influence patient-related outcomes or failure rates. Subjects with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity may not benefit from a LET in revision ACLR. Level of evidence III

Increased Postoperative Manual Knee Laxity at 2 Years Results in Inferior Long-term Subjective Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 2632-2645 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Sundemo ◽  
Ninni Sernert ◽  
Jüri Kartus ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽  
Eleonor Svantesson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Subjective Outcome ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Ikdc Score

Background: Increased postoperative rotatory knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may be associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis and inferior subjective outcome, although long-term studies are lacking. In terms of anteroposterior knee laxity, this association has not yet been established. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate whether postoperative knee laxity is associated with inferior long-term outcome in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that increased laxity would cause an inferior long-term clinical and radiographic outcome. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 193 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and were examined at both 2 and 16 years postoperatively. At the 2-year follow-up, knee laxity was tested by use of the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, the pivot-shift test, and the KT-1000 arthrometer. Outcome variables examined at the 16-year follow-up involved a radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis, patient-reported outcome measurements, and the single-legged hop test. Results: At the long-term follow-up, 147 (76%) patients were examined. The mean follow-up period for the included patients was 16.4 ± 1.2 years. A negative Lachman test at 2 years resulted in a superior International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (76.3 ± 19.4 vs 67.8 ± 19.3, P < .05) and Lysholm score (85.2 ± 11.9 vs 76.9 ± 17.8, P < .05) at the 16-year follow-up. Correspondingly, a negative anterior drawer test at 2 years was associated with a superior IKDC score (75.3 ± 18.7 vs 62.9 ± 20.2, P < .05) and Lysholm score (84.1 ± 12.1 vs 72.6 ± 20.2, P < .05) at 16 years. A negative pivot-shift test resulted in a superior IKDC score (74.5 ± 18.8 vs 46.9 ± 17.8, P < .05), a superior Lysholm score (83.3 ± 13.4 vs 58.9 ± 23.0, P < .05), and an increased level of activity (Tegner activity scale, median [range]: 4 [1-10] vs 3 [0-5], P < .05). Osteoarthritis was overrepresented in patients with positive manual knee laxity tests, but the difference was not statistically significant. The KT-1000 arthrometer result was not correlated with any outcome variables assessed in this study. Conclusion: Increased manual anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity 2 years after ACL reconstruction is associated with an inferior long-term subjective outcome.

Association Between Psychological Readiness and Knee Laxity and Their Predictive Value for Return to Sport in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110218
Author(s):  
Anne Gro Heyn Faleide ◽  
Liv Heide Magnussen ◽  
Bård Erik Bogen ◽  
Torbjørn Strand ◽  
Ingunn Fleten Mo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Lachman Test ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Deciding when patients are ready to return to sport (RTS) after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is challenging. The understanding of which factors affect readiness and how they may be related is limited. Therefore, despite widespread use of RTS testing, there is a lack of knowledge about which tests are informative on the ability to resume sports. Purpose: To examine whether there is an association between knee laxity and psychological readiness to RTS after ACLR and to evaluate the predictive value of these measures on sports resumption. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients aged ≥16 years engaged in physical activity/sports before injury were recruited at routine clinical assessment 9-12 months after ACLR. Exclusion criteria were concomitant ligament surgery at ACLR and/or previous ACL injury in the contralateral knee. At baseline, a project-specific activity questionnaire and the ACL–Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale were completed. Knee laxity was assessed by use of the Lachman test, KT-1000 arthrometer, and pivot-shift test. Two years after surgery, knee reinjuries and RTS status (the project-specific questionnaire) were registered. Associations between psychological readiness and knee laxity were evaluated with the Spearman rho test, and predictive ability of the ACL-RSI and knee laxity tests were examined using regression analyses. Results: Of 171 patients screened for eligibility, 132 were included in the study. There were small but significant associations between the ACL-RSI score and the Lachman test (rho = −0.18; P = .046) and KT-1000 arthrometer measurement (rho = −0.18; P = .040) but no association between the ACL-RSI and the pivot-shift test at the time of recruitment. Of the total patients, 36% returned to preinjury sport level by 2 years after surgery. Higher age, better psychological readiness, and less anterior tibial displacement (KT-1000 arthrometer measurement) were significant predictors of 2-year RTS (explained variance, 33%). Conclusion: Small but significant associations were found between measurements of psychological readiness and anterior tibial displacement, indicating that patients with less knee laxity after ACLR feel more ready to RTS. ACL-RSI and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were independent predictors of 2-year RTS and should be considered in RTS assessments after ACLR.

scholarly journals Moderately Increased Post-Operative Anterior Knee Laxity does not Predict Decreases in Patient-Reported Outcome Scores or Subsequent Knee Surgery between 2 and 6 Years after ACL reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0049
Author(s):  
◽  
Robert Magnussen
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Knee Surgery ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Laxity ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Knee

Objectives: A primary goal of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is to reduce pathologically increased anterior and rotational laxity of the knee. The impact of residual anterior laxity on patient-reported outcomes and the risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery has not been clearly elucidated. The goal of this study is to determine the influence of residual anterior knee laxity on changes in patient-reported outcomes from 2 to 6 years following ACL reconstruction and risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery during that period. Methods: From a prospective multi-center cohort of patients, 429 patients under age 35 years injured in sports with no history of concomitant ligament surgery, revision ACL surgery, or surgery of the contralateral knee were identified at a minimum 2 years following primary ACL reconstruction. These patients underwent a KT-1000 assessment of anterior knee laxity examination relative to the contralateral normal knee by an independent examiner and completed patient-reported outcome assessments with KOOS and IKDC scores. Patients were followed until the 6-year mark following ACL reconstruction and any ipsilateral knee surgeries performed during this period were noted. Patients completed the same patient-reported outcome assessments at 6 years post-operative. Subsequent surgery risk was calculated and compared between those patients with side-to-side KT-1000 differences between -1 and 2 mm and those with a side-to-side KT-1000 differences between 2 and 6mm. Multiple linear regression models were built to determine the relationship between KT-1000 and 2 to 6 year change in patient-reported outcome score while controlling for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, meniscus and cartilage status, and graft type. Results: Thee hundred seventy-seven patients (87.9%) were available for follow-up at the six year mark post-operative. There were 36 patients with a side to side KT-1000 difference less than -1 mm (tighter than contralateral) that were excluded from the analysis. Side-to-side KT-1000 difference was between -1 and 2 mm (IKDC A) in 153 patients, between 2 and 6 mm (IKDC B) in 162 patients, and greater than 6 mm in 26 patients. Subsequent knee surgery was performed significantly more patients in the IKDC A group (23 of 153 patients, 15%) than in the IKDC B group (13 of 162 patients, 8%) (p = 0.05). Increased side-to-side KT-1000 differences at 2-year post-operative were correlated with decreases in subjective IKDC score (β = -0.67, p = 0.038) and KOOS-sport subscale (β = -0.90, p = 0.029) but not with other KOOS subscales. A 5mm increase in anterior laxity at 2 years would predict a 3.4 point decrease in IKDC subjective score and a 4.5 point decrease in the KOOS sport subscale at 6 years post-operative. Conclusion: Three presence of 2 to 6 mm of residual side-to-side KT-1000 difference is not associated with an increased risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery or clinically relevant decrease in patient-reported outcome score up to 6 years following ACL reconstruction.

Neither Residual Anterior Knee Laxity Up to 6 mm nor a Pivot Glide Predict Patient-Reported Outcome Scores or Subsequent Knee Surgery Between 2 and 6 Years After ACL Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110250
Author(s):  
Robert A. Magnussen ◽  
Emily K. Reinke ◽  
Laura J. Huston ◽  
Isaac Briskin ◽  
Charles L. Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Knee Surgery ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Laxity ◽  
Kt 1000

Background: A primary goal of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to reduce pathologically increased anterior and rotational laxity of the knee, but the effects of residual laxity on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after ACLR remain unclear. Hypothesis: Increased residual laxity at 2 years postoperatively is predictive of a higher risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery and decreases in PRO scores from 2 to 6 years after surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: From a prospective multicenter cohort, 433 patients aged <36 years were identified at a minimum 2 years after primary ACLR. These patients underwent a KT-1000 arthrometer assessment and pivot-shift test and completed PRO assessments with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. Patients completed the same PROs at 6 years postoperatively, and any subsequent ipsilateral knee procedures during this period were recorded. Subsequent surgery risk and change in PROs from 2 to 6 years postoperatively were compared based on residual side-to-side KT-1000 arthrometer differences (<−1 mm, −1 to 2 mm, 2 to 6 mm, and >6 mm) in laxity at 2 years postoperatively. Multiple linear regression models were built to determine the relationship between 2-year postoperative knee laxity and 2- to 6-year change in PROs while controlling for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, meniscal and cartilage status, and graft type. Results: A total of 381 patients (87.9%) were available for follow-up 6 years postoperatively. There were no significant differences in risk of subsequent knee surgery based on residual knee laxity. Patients with a difference >6 mm in side-to-side anterior laxity at 2 years postoperatively were noted to have a larger decrease in PROs from 2 to 6 years postoperatively ( P < .05). No significant differences in any PROs were noted among patients with a difference <6 mm in side-to-side anterior laxity or those with pivot glide (IKDC B) versus no pivot shift (IKDC A). Conclusion: The presence of a residual side-to-side KT-1000 arthrometer difference <6 mm or pivot glide at 2 years after ACLR is not associated with an increased risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery or decreased PROs up to 6 years after ACLR. Conversely, patients exhibiting a difference >6 mm in side-to-side anterior laxity were noted to have significantly decreased PROs at 6 years after ACLR.

scholarly journals Anterior and Rotational Knee Laxity Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Knee Function 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 2077-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Magnussen ◽  
Emily K. Reinke ◽  
Laura J. Huston ◽  
Jack T. Andrish ◽  
Charles L. Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Rotational Knee Laxity

Background: While a primary goal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to reduce pathologically increased anterior and rotational knee laxity, the relationship between knee laxity after ACL reconstruction and patient-reported knee function remains unclear. Hypothesis: There would be no significant correlation between the degree of residual anterior and rotational knee laxity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: From a prospective multicenter nested cohort of patients, 433 patients younger than 36 years of age injured in sports with no history of concomitant ligament surgery, revision ACL surgery, or surgery of the contralateral knee were identified and evaluated at a minimum 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. Each patient underwent Lachman and pivot-shift evaluation as well as a KT-1000 arthrometer assessment along with Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. A proportional odds logistic regression model was used to predict each 2-year PRO score, controlling for preoperative score, age, sex, body mass index, smoking, Marx activity score, education, subsequent surgery, meniscal and cartilage status, graft type, and range of motion asymmetry. Measures of knee laxity were independently added to each model to determine correlation with PROs. Results: Side-to-side manual Lachman differences were IKDC A in 246 (57%) patients, IKDC B in 183 (42%) patients, and IKDC C in 4 (<1%) patients. Pivot-shift was classified as IKDC A in 209 (48%) patients, IKDC B in 183 (42%) patients, and IKDC C in 11 (2.5%) patients. The mean side-to-side KT-1000 difference was 2.0 ± 2.6 mm. No significant correlations were noted between pivot-shift or anterior tibial translation as assessed by Lachman or KT-1000 and any PRO. All predicted differences in PROs based on IKDC A versus B pivot-shift and anterior tibial translation were less than 4 points. Conclusion: Neither the presence of IKDC A versus B pivot-shift nor increased anterior tibial translation of up to 6 mm is associated with clinically relevant decreases in PROs 2 years after ACL reconstruction.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using a Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Autograft and that Using a Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Autograft

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Katagiri ◽  
Yusuke Nakagawa ◽  
Kazumasa Miyatake ◽  
Nobutake Ozeki ◽  
Yuji Kohno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Anterior Knee

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft and that using a double-bundle hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods Consecutive cases of revision ACLRs were reviewed. The Lysholm knee scale and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were recorded at the final follow-up. The pivot shift test, Lachman test, and anterior knee laxity measurement using an arthrometer were evaluated before revision ACLR and at final follow-up. Contralateral knee laxity was also evaluated, and side-to-side differences noted. The Lysholm knee scale, KOOS, the pivot shift test, Lachman test, and anterior knee laxity were compared between HT versus BPTB autograft recipient groups using the Mann–Whitney test or the t-test. Results Forty-one patients who underwent revision ACLR and followed up for at least 2 years were included. The graft source was a BPTB autograft in 23 patients (BPTB group) and a double-bundle HT autograft in 18 patients (HT group). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 44 ± 28 months in the BPTB group and 36 ± 18 in the HT group (p = 0.38). The HT group had significantly higher KOOS in the pain subscale (less pain) than the BPTB group at the final follow-up (BPTB group 84.2 vs. HT group 94.4; p = 0.02). The BPTB group showed significantly smaller side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity (superior stability) than the HT group (0.3 vs. 2.6 mm; p < 0.01). The percentage of patients with residual anterior knee laxity in the BPTB group was significantly lower than that in the HT group (9.5% vs. 46.7%; odds ratio, 8.3; p = 0.02). Study Design This was a level 3 retrospective study. Conclusion Revision ACLR with a BPTB autograft was associated with superior results regarding restoration of knee joint stability as compared with that with a double-bundle HT autograft, whereas double-bundle HT autograft was superior to BPTB autograft in terms of patient-reported outcomes of pain. The rest of the patient-reported outcomes were equal between the two groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document