scholarly journals Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis in revision ACL reconstruction does not influence the outcome of patients with low-grade anterior knee laxity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Eggeling ◽  
T. C. Drenck ◽  
J. Frings ◽  
M. Krause ◽  
Alexander Korthaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Limited Evidence ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Total Failure ◽  
Anterior Knee

Abstract Introduction There is limited evidence on the indications of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in revision ACLR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the LET in patients with revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity. Methods Between 2013 and 2018, 78 patients who underwent revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity [≤ 5 mm side-to-side difference (SSD)] were included in the retrospective cohort study. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 23 patients during revision ACLR and patients were clinically examined with a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery. Postoperative failure of the revision ACLR was defined as SSD in Rolimeter® testing ≥ 5 mm or pivot-shift grade 2/3. Results In total, failure of the revision ACLR occurred in 11.5% (n = 9) of the cases at a mean follow-up of 28.7 ± 8.8 (24–67) months. Patients with an additional LET and revision ACLR did not show a significantly reduced failure rate (13% vs. 11%) or an improved clinical outcome according to the postoperative functional scores or pain in regards to patients with an isolated revision ACLR (Tegner 5.7 ± 1.3 vs. 5.9 ± 1.5, n.s.; IKDC 77.5 ± 16.2 vs. 80.1 ± 14.9, n.s., Lysholm 81.9 ± 14.2 vs. 83.8 ± 14.5, n.s.; VAS 1.9 ± 2.2 vs. 1.2 ± 1.7, n.s.). Conclusions An additional LET in patients with revision ACLR with low-grade anterior knee laxity does not influence patient-related outcomes or failure rates. Subjects with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity may not benefit from a LET in revision ACLR. Level of evidence III

scholarly journals Higher frequency of osteoarthritis in patients with ACL graft rupture than in those with intact ACL grafts 30 years after reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 2139-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Söderman ◽  
Marie-Louise Wretling ◽  
Mari Hänni ◽  
Christina Mikkelsen ◽  
Robert J. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Knee

Abstract Purpose The aim was to assess the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction regarding graft failure, knee laxity, and osteoarthritis (OA) from a longterm perspective. It was hypothesized that intact ACL graft reduces the risk for increased OA development. Methods The cohort comprised 60 patients with a median follow-up 31 (range 28–33) years after ACL reconstruction. They were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, KT-1000 arthrometer and the pivot shift test. Results Out of the 60 patients, 30 (50%) showed an intact ACL graft and 30 (50%) a ruptured or absent ACL graft. Patients with ruptured ACL grafts had more medial tibiofemoral compartment OA than those with an intact ACL graft (p = 0.0003). OA was asymmetric in patients with ruptured ACL grafts with more OA in the medial than in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment (p = 0.013) and the patellofemoral compartment (p = 0.002). The distribution of OA between compartments was similar in patients with an intact ACL graft. KT-1000 values of anterior knee laxity were higher in patients with ruptured compared to those with intact ACL grafts (p = 0.012). Side-to-side comparisons of anterior knee laxity showed higher KT-1000 values in patients with ruptured ACL graft (p = 0.0003) and similar results in those with intact graft (p = 0.09). The pivot shift grade was higher in the group with a ruptured ACL graft (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Median 31 (range 28–33) years after ACL reconstruction, 50% of the patients showed an intact ACL graft and no side-to-side difference regarding anterior knee laxity. Patients with ruptured ACL grafts had more OA of the medial tibiofemoral compartment than those with intact ACL grafts. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

scholarly journals Preoperative medial knee instability is an underestimated risk factor for failure of revision ACL reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 2458-2467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Alm ◽  
Matthias Krause ◽  
Karl-Heinz Frosch ◽  
Ralph Akoto
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Knee Instability ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Medial Knee ◽  
Risk Of Failure ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Knee

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to carefully analyse the reasons for revision ACLR failure to optimize the surgical revision technique and minimize the risk of recurrent re-rupture. Large studies with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up that clinically examine patients with revision ACLR are rare. Methods Between 2013 and 2016, 111 patients who underwent revision ACLR were included in the retrospective study. All patients were examined for a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery (35 ± 3.4 months, mean ± STD) and identified as “failed revision ACLR” (side-to-side difference ≥ 5 mm and pivot-shift grade 2/3) or “stable revision ACLR”. Results Failure after revision ACLR occurred in 14.5% (n = 16) of the cases. Preoperative medial knee instability (n = 36) was associated with failure; thus, patients had a 17 times greater risk of failure when medial knee instability was diagnosed (p = 0.015). The risk of failure was reduced when patients had medial stabilization (n = 24, p = 0.034) and extra-articular lateral tenodesis during revision surgery (n = 51, p = 0.028). Increased posterior tibial slope (n = 11 ≥ 12°, p = 0.046) and high-grade anterior knee laxity (side-to-side difference > 6 mm and pivot-shift grade 3, n = 41, p = 0.034) were associated with increased failure of revision ACLR. Obese patients had a 9 times greater risk of failure (p = 0.008, n = 30). Conclusion This study demonstrates the largest revision ACLR patient group with pre- and postoperative clinical examination data and a follow-up of 2 years published to date. Preoperative medial knee instability is an underestimated risk factor for revision ACLR failure. Additionally, high-grade anterior knee laxity, increased PTS and high BMI are risk factors for failure of revision ACLR, while additional medial stabilization and lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduce the risk of failure. Level of evidence III.

Anterior Laxity at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Comparable When Using Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation and Interference Screw Fixation

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 2366-2375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achilleas Boutsiadis ◽  
Jean-Claude Panisset ◽  
Brian M. Devitt ◽  
Frédéric Mauris ◽  
Renaud Barthelemy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Femoral Fixation ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Laxity ◽  
Interference Screw Fixation ◽  
Anterior Knee ◽  
Screw Group

Background: Adjustable-loop suspensory fixation (ALSF) devices are commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, concern exists regarding the potential for lengthening under cyclical loads. Purpose: To compare the residual anterior laxity of 2 methods of femoral fixation, ALSF versus interference screw fixation, in patients undergoing isolated ACLR in the absence of meniscal injuries. To determine the preoperative risk factors associated with residual postoperative anterior laxity. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed comparing 2 groups of patients that underwent primary ACLR using ALSF versus bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Anterior knee laxity was assessed with Telos stress radiography, while functional outcomes were evaluated with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner activity level scale at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with residual postoperative laxity >3 mm. Results: Of the 1136 patients who underwent ACLR during the study period, 363 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 272 patients (75%) (mean age, 31.7 ± 10.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 25.7 ± 4.6 months (range, 24-36 months) consented to participate (screw group: n = 121; ALSF group: n = 151). The 2 groups were statistically comparable in terms of age, sex ratio, time from injury to surgery, graft diameter, preoperative laxity, preoperative objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade, and preoperative Tegner score. The mean postoperative laxity as a continuous variable was significantly different comparing the ALSF and screw groups (1.49 ± 1.98 mm and 2.32 ± 1.97 mm, respectively; P < .001). In the screw group, 76 patients (62.8%) had normal (<3 mm), 40 (33.1%) had nearly normal (3-6 mm), and 5 (4.1%) had abnormal (≥6 mm) postoperative knee laxity according to the IKDC grade, while in the ALSF group, 112 patients (74.2%) had normal, 37 (24.5%) had nearly normal, and 2 (1.3%) had abnormal laxity ( P = .0833). No significant difference was found in KOOS or Tegner scores comparing the 2 femoral fixation methods: KOOS, 90.6 ± 7.5 (ALSF group) and 90.6 ± 7.4 (screw group) ( P = .7631), versus Tegner, 6.5 ± 1.3 (ALSF group) and 6.3 ± 1.4 (screw group) ( P = .2992). A negative correlation was found between postoperative laxity and final Tegner ( rs = −0.303, P < .001) and KOOS scores ( rs = −0.168, P = .005). The initial univariate analysis showed differences between groups of patients with residual knee laxity ≥3 mm and <3 mm on preoperative pivot shift, preoperative laxity, age, fixation type, and preoperative objective IKDC grade. The multivariate analysis on these factors showed that the pivot shift remained the only significant predictor for residual laxity ≥3 mm for pivot shift grade 2 compared with grade 1 (odds ratio, 4.689 [95% CI, 2.465-9.286]) and for pivot shift grade 3 compared with grade 1 (odds ratio, 58.025 [95% CI, 12.757-557.741]) ( P < .001). Conclusion: For primary ACLR, the use of an ALSF device for femoral fixation is associated with noninferior postoperative anterior knee laxity results compared with interference screw fixation at a minimum 2 years’ follow-up. The preoperative pivot shift is the only significant risk factor for postoperative residual anterior knee laxity >3 mm.

Preoperative knee laxity measurements predict the achievement of a patient-acceptable symptom state after ACL reconstruction: a prospective multicenter study

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Concomitant Injuries ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State ◽  
Tibial Translation

ObjectiveTo determine whether patient-related factors, concomitant injuries and preoperative knee laxity could predict a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) in the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) at 1 and 2 years follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in a multicentre cohort.MethodsPatients between 14 and 50 years of age who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft within 1 year from the index injury were eligible. Additionally, only patients who completed the IKDC-SKF questionnaire at 1 or 2 years of follow-ups were included. Preoperative knee laxity assessment of patients in the awake state was performed using rolimeter, the Lachman and the pivot-shift test. The pivot shift was graded according to the IKDC criteria and also quantified by the use of non-invasive technology for (1) lateral tibial translation and (2) tibial acceleration. The quantitative pivot shift (QPS) was examined in the awake state and under anaesthesia (EUA). Univariable logistic regression models were performed with achieving PASS in the IKDC as the dependent variable.ResultsA total of 86 patients had complete data on the IKDC-SKF score at 1-year follow-up, of which 67 patients (77.9%) achieved PASS (age 24.8±9.3 years, 43% females). Two-year data were available for 50 patients, of which 39 patients (78.9%) achieved PASS (age 23.9±9.2 years, 42.0% females). A low-grade manual pivot shift according to IKDC grading had increased odds of achieving PASS at 1 year (OR=2.96 (95% CI 1.01 to 8.66), P<0.05) compared with patients who displayed a high-grade pivot shift preoperatively. However, this was not confirmed by the preoperative QPS measures (awake: tibial translation; OR=0.99,(95% CI 0.72 to 1.35), (n.s.), acceleration; OR=1.04,(95% CI 0.68 to 1.59), (n.s.) EUA: tibial translation; OR=1.02 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.31), (n.s.), acceleration; OR=1.14 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.40), (n.s.)). None of the studied variables of patient characteristics, concomitant injuries or knee joint laxity predicted PASS at the 2-year follow-up.ConclusionAlmost four in every five patients were able to achieve PASS 1 and 2 years after anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. The presence of preoperative low-grade pivot shift increased the odds of achieving an acceptable level of knee function 1 year after ACL reconstruction compared with high-grade pivot shift; however, QPS did not confirm achievement of PASS in this study.Level of evidenceLevel III, prospective cohort.

scholarly journals Revision ACL Reconstruction - A retrospective failure analysis with a mean follow up of 35 months

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0030
Author(s):  
Lena Alm ◽  
Matthias Krause ◽  
Karl-Heinz Frosch ◽  
Ralph Akoto
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Knee Instability ◽  
Medial Knee ◽  
Risk Of Failure ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Anterior Knee

Aims and Objectives: While patients following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery show satisfying results, the outcome after revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) seems to be less favourable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients after revision ACLR. We hypothesize that peripheral knee instabilities and further concomitant lesions are risk factors for failure of revision ACLR. Furthermore, we hypothesize that peripheral stabilisation will reduce the risk of failure. Materials and Methods: Between 2013 and 2016, 111 patients with revision ACLR (revision surgery after primary ACL reconstruction) were included in the retrospective study. All patients were clinically examined with a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery (mean 35 months) and identified as “failed revision ACLR” (side-to-side difference greater than 5mm and/or pivot-shift grade 2/3) and “stable revision ACLR”. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate whether certain predisposing factors were associated with increased odds of failure of the revision ACLR. Results: Failure after revision ACLR occurred in 14.5% (n=16) of the cases. Preoperative medial knee instability (n=36) was associated with failure of revision ACLR, thus patients had a 17 times greater risk of failure when medial knee instability was diagnosed preoperatively. Also, the risk of failure was reduced when patients had peripheral medial (n=24) and/ or antero-lateral stabilisation (n=51). Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS, n=11 greater than 12°) and high-grade anterior knee laxity (side-to-side-difference greater than 5 mm and/or pivot-shift grade 3, n=41) were associated with failed revision ACLR. Furthermore, patients had a 9 times greater risk of failure when they were obese (BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, n=30). Also, postoperative functional scores in comparison to preoperative scores were shown to be significantly higher (Lysholm 85±27 vs. 51±31.9, p=0.024; Tegner 6.5± 1.3 vs. 4± 2.6, p=0.015). Conclusion: Results following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are less favourable than primary ACLR. Peripheral medial knee instability, high-grade anterior knee laxity, increased PTS and high BMI are risk factors for failure in revision ACLR while additional medial and/or antero-lateral stabilisation reduces the risk of failure.

scholarly journals Slope-Correction Osteotomy with Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Highly Effective in Treating High-Grade Anterior Knee Laxity

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. 3478-3485
Author(s):  
Ralph Akoto ◽  
Lena Alm ◽  
Tobias Claus Drenck ◽  
Jannik Frings ◽  
Matthias Krause ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Correction Osteotomy ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Slope Correction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Anterior Knee

Background: Both an elevated posterior tibial slope (PTS) and high-grade anterior knee laxity are often present in patients who undergo revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, and these conditions are independent risk factors for ACL graft failure. Clinical data on slope-correction osteotomy combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) do not yet exist. Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and slope-correction osteotomy combined with LET. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, we performed a 2-stage procedure: slope-correction osteotomy was performed first, and then revision ACLR in combination with LET was performed in 22 patients with ACLR failure and high-grade anterior knee laxity. Twenty patients (6 women and 14 men; mean age, 27.8 ± 8.6 years; range, 18-49 years) were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 30.5 ± 9.3 months (range, 24-56 months), in this retrospective case series. Postoperative failure was defined as a side-to-side difference of ≥5 mm in the Rolimeter test and a pivot-shift grade of 2 or 3. Results: The PTS decreased from 15.3° to 8.9°, the side-to-side difference decreased from 7.2 to 1.1 mm, and the pivot shift was no longer evident in any of the patients. No patients exhibited revision ACLR failure and all patients showed good to excellent postoperative functional scores (mean ± SD: visual analog scale, 0.5 ± 0.6; Tegner, 6.1 ± 0.9; Lysholm, 90.9 ± 6.4; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] Symptoms, 95.2 ± 8.4; KOOS Pain, 94.7 ± 5.2; KOOS Activities of Daily Living, 98.5 ± 3.2; KOOS Function in Sport and Recreation, 86.8 ± 12.4; and KOOS Quality of Life, 65.4 ± 14.9). Conclusion: Slope-correction osteotomy in combination with LET is a safe and reliable procedure in patients with high-grade anterior knee laxity and a PTS of ≥12°. Normal knee joint stability was restored and good to excellent functional scores were achieved after a follow-up of at least 2 years.

scholarly journals Incidence and Risk Factors for Residual High-Grade Pivot Shift After ACL Reconstruction With or Without a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110035
Author(s):  
Christophe Jacquet ◽  
Charles Pioger ◽  
Romain Seil ◽  
Raghbir Khakha ◽  
Sebastien Parratte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Rotatory Knee Laxity

Background: Residual rotatory knee laxity at midterm follow-up after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus ACLR with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) remains an issue. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate the outcomes of ACLR with or without additional LET at a minimum 2-year follow-up in patients with preoperative high-grade pivot shift (PS). Our hypothesis was that the addition of LET would decrease the risk of secondary meniscal injury and the presence of residual high-grade PS at follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis performed at 3 sports medicine centers identified 266 study patients; all had a high-grade PS (grade 2 or 3) preoperatively and underwent isolated ACLR with or without LET. Four different ACLR techniques were used: single-strand quadrupled semitendinosus (ST4) ACLR without LET (ST4 group; n = 55), ST4 with anatomic LET (ST4+LET group; n = 77), bone–patellar tendon and modified Lemaire LET (BTB+LET group; n = 43), and quadriceps tendon and modified Lemaire LET (QT+LET group; n = 91). At follow-up, we evaluated for the presence of high-grade (grade ≥2) PS. Preoperative meniscal tears and their treatment were recorded. Results: Overall, 185 (69.5%) patients had at least 1 meniscal tear at index surgery. The mean follow-up period was 44.3 months; 47 (17.7%) patients had a new meniscal tear and 64 (24%) patients had a high-grade PS at follow-up. Compared with meniscal repair, significant predictors for high-grade PS at follow-up were meniscectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.65 [95% CI, 1.19-5.63]; P = .02) and nonrepair of preoperative meniscal tear (OR = 3.26 [95% CI, 1.27-9.43]; P = .007). The appearance of a new symptomatic meniscal tear was the strongest significant predictor of high-grade PS at follow-up (OR = 4.31 [95% CI, 2.31-8.06]; P < .001). No significant correlation was observed between the addition of LET and the presence of high-grade PS at follow-up. Conclusion: In the current study, 1 in 4 patients with high-grade PS before ACLR with or without LET was at risk of residual rotatory knee laxity at mean 44-month follow-up, regardless of the technique used. Repairing a pre-existing meniscal lesion was more effective than performing LET to decrease the presence of a high-grade PS at follow-up.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using a Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Autograft and that Using a Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Autograft

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Katagiri ◽  
Yusuke Nakagawa ◽  
Kazumasa Miyatake ◽  
Nobutake Ozeki ◽  
Yuji Kohno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Hamstring Tendon ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Anterior Knee

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft and that using a double-bundle hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods Consecutive cases of revision ACLRs were reviewed. The Lysholm knee scale and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were recorded at the final follow-up. The pivot shift test, Lachman test, and anterior knee laxity measurement using an arthrometer were evaluated before revision ACLR and at final follow-up. Contralateral knee laxity was also evaluated, and side-to-side differences noted. The Lysholm knee scale, KOOS, the pivot shift test, Lachman test, and anterior knee laxity were compared between HT versus BPTB autograft recipient groups using the Mann–Whitney test or the t-test. Results Forty-one patients who underwent revision ACLR and followed up for at least 2 years were included. The graft source was a BPTB autograft in 23 patients (BPTB group) and a double-bundle HT autograft in 18 patients (HT group). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 44 ± 28 months in the BPTB group and 36 ± 18 in the HT group (p = 0.38). The HT group had significantly higher KOOS in the pain subscale (less pain) than the BPTB group at the final follow-up (BPTB group 84.2 vs. HT group 94.4; p = 0.02). The BPTB group showed significantly smaller side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity (superior stability) than the HT group (0.3 vs. 2.6 mm; p < 0.01). The percentage of patients with residual anterior knee laxity in the BPTB group was significantly lower than that in the HT group (9.5% vs. 46.7%; odds ratio, 8.3; p = 0.02). Study Design This was a level 3 retrospective study. Conclusion Revision ACLR with a BPTB autograft was associated with superior results regarding restoration of knee joint stability as compared with that with a double-bundle HT autograft, whereas double-bundle HT autograft was superior to BPTB autograft in terms of patient-reported outcomes of pain. The rest of the patient-reported outcomes were equal between the two groups.

scholarly journals A Novel Retensioning Technique for Arthroscopic Repair of PASTA Lesions: A Clinical and Radiologic Outcome Study of 24 Shoulders

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712098688
Author(s):  
Su Cheol Kim ◽  
Jong Ho Jung ◽  
Sang Min Lee ◽  
Jae Chul Yoo
Keyword(s):  
Constant Score ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Tendon Healing ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Simple Shoulder Test ◽  
Shoulder Range Of Motion ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
The Mean

Background: There is no consensus on the ideal treatment for partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesions without tendon damage. Purpose: To introduce a novel “retensioning technique” for arthroscopic PASTA repair and to assess the clinical and radiologic outcomes of this technique. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 24 patients whose PASTA lesion was treated using the retensioning technique between January 2011 and December 2015. The mean ± SD patient age was 57.6 ± 7.0 years (range, 43-71 years), and the mean follow-up period was 57.6 ± 23.4 months (range, 24.0-93.7 months). Sutures were placed at the edge of the PASTA lesion, tensioned, and fixed to lateral-row anchors. After surgery, shoulder range of motion (ROM) and functional scores (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, VAS for function, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Korean Shoulder Score) were evaluated at regular outpatient visits; at 6 months postoperatively, repair integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: At 12 months postoperatively, all ROM variables were improved compared with preoperative values, and shoulder abduction was improved significantly (136.00° vs 107.08°; P = .009). At final follow-up (>24 months), the VAS pain, VAS function, and ASES scores improved, from 6.39, 4.26, and 40.09 to 1.00, 8.26, and 85.96, respectively (all P < .001). At 6 months postoperatively, 21 of the 24 patients (87.5%) underwent follow-up MRI; the postoperative repair integrity was Sugaya type 1 or 2 for all of these patients, and 13 patients showed complete improvement of the lesion compared with preoperatively. Conclusion: The retensioning technique showed improved ROM and pain and functional scores as well as good tendon healing on MRI scans at 6-month follow-up in the majority of patients. Thus, the retensioning technique appears to be reliable procedure for the PASTA lesion.

Effect of Tibial Tunnel Placement Using the Lateral Meniscus as a Landmark on Clinical Outcomes of Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199967
Author(s):  
Kadir Büyükdoğan ◽  
Michael S. Laidlaw ◽  
Michael A. Fox ◽  
Michelle E. Kew ◽  
Mark D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Plateau ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Anterior Knee Laxity ◽  
Posterior Group ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Knee

Background: It remains unclear if use of the lateral meniscus anterior horn (LMAH) as a landmark will produce consistent tunnel positions in the anteroposterior (AP) distance across the tibial plateau. Purpose: To evaluate the AP location of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction tibial tunnels utilizing the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark and to examine how tunnel placement affects knee stability and clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 98 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts between March 2013 and June 2017. Patients with unilateral ACL injuries and a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in the study. All guide pins for the tibial tunnel were placed using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark. Guide pins were evaluated with the Bernard-Hertel grid in the femur and the Stäubli-Rauschning method in the tibia. Patients were divided by the radiographic location of the articular entry point of the guide pin with relation to the anterior 40% of the tibial plateau. Outcomes were evaluated by the Marx Activity Scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Anterior knee laxity was evaluated using a KT-1000 arthrometer and graded with the objective portion of the IKDC form. Rotational stability was evaluated using the pivot-shift test. Results: A total of 60 patients were available for follow-up at a mean 28.6 months. The overall percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel was 39.3% ± 3.8% (mean ± SD; range, 31%-47%). Side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity was significantly lower in the anterior group than the posterior group (1.2 ± 1.1 mm vs 2.5 ± 1.3 mm; P < .001; r = 0.51). The percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel demonstrated a positive medium correlation with side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity as measured by a KT-1000 arthrometer ( r = 0.430; P < .001). The anterior group reported significantly better distribution of IKDC grading as compared with the posterior group (26 grade A and 6 grade B vs 15 grade A and 13 grade B; P = .043; V = 0.297). The pivot-shift test results and outcome scores showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intraoperative landmark yields a wide range of tibial tunnel locations along the tibial plateau, with anterior placement of the tibial tunnel leading toward improved anterior knee stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document