Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using a Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Autograft and that Using a Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Autograft

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft and that using a double-bundle hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Methods Consecutive cases of revision ACLRs were reviewed. The Lysholm knee scale and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were recorded at the final follow-up. The pivot shift test, Lachman test, and anterior knee laxity measurement using an arthrometer were evaluated before revision ACLR and at final follow-up. Contralateral knee laxity was also evaluated, and side-to-side differences noted. The Lysholm knee scale, KOOS, the pivot shift test, Lachman test, and anterior knee laxity were compared between HT versus BPTB autograft recipient groups using the Mann–Whitney test or the t-test. Results Forty-one patients who underwent revision ACLR and followed up for at least 2 years were included. The graft source was a BPTB autograft in 23 patients (BPTB group) and a double-bundle HT autograft in 18 patients (HT group). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 44 ± 28 months in the BPTB group and 36 ± 18 in the HT group (p = 0.38). The HT group had significantly higher KOOS in the pain subscale (less pain) than the BPTB group at the final follow-up (BPTB group 84.2 vs. HT group 94.4; p = 0.02). The BPTB group showed significantly smaller side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity (superior stability) than the HT group (0.3 vs. 2.6 mm; p < 0.01). The percentage of patients with residual anterior knee laxity in the BPTB group was significantly lower than that in the HT group (9.5% vs. 46.7%; odds ratio, 8.3; p = 0.02). Study Design This was a level 3 retrospective study. Conclusion Revision ACLR with a BPTB autograft was associated with superior results regarding restoration of knee joint stability as compared with that with a double-bundle HT autograft, whereas double-bundle HT autograft was superior to BPTB autograft in terms of patient-reported outcomes of pain. The rest of the patient-reported outcomes were equal between the two groups.

Comparison of anterior knee laxity, stiffness, genu recurvatum, and general joint laxity in the late follicular phase and the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle

Background One risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury may be fluctuations in female hormones. This study examined variability in joint laxity, as a risk factor for ACL injury, during the menstrual cycle. Methods Subjects were 15 female university students with regular menstrual cycles. We measured estradiol (E2) concentration, anterior knee laxity (AKL), stiffness, genu recurvatum (GR), and general joint laxity (GJL) during the late follicular and ovulatory phases. AKL was measured as anterior tibial displacement of the femur after application of 44-, 89-, and 133-N loads on the tibia. Stiffness was calculated as Δforce/Δdisplacement at loads of 44–89 N and between 89 and 133 N. GR was measured prone, with the base of the patella distal to the edge of the bed. The University of Tokyo joint laxity test was used to evaluate GJL. Results E2 concentration was significantly higher in the ovulatory phase than in the late follicular phase (p = 0.018), AKL and stiffness did not differ significantly between phases, and GR and GJL were significantly higher in the ovulatory phase than in the late follicular phase (p = 0.011, 0.031). Conclusion These findings suggest that E2 concentrations may affect GR and GJL during the menstrual cycle.

Effect of Time on MRI Appearance of Graft After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparison of Autologous Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Grafts

Background: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), changes in the appearance of the ACL graft can be monitored using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the MRI signal intensity (SI) of hamstring and quadriceps tendon grafts during the first postoperative year after ACLR. As a secondary aim, the relationship of SI to clinical and anatomic measurements was analyzed. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 78 patients who underwent ACLR with an autologous graft were reviewed; 55 received hamstring grafts and 23 received quadriceps tendon grafts. At 3 and 9 months postoperatively, 3-T MRI was performed using a dedicated knee coil, and the median SI of the intra-articular ACL graft was measured on sagittal-plane images. Postoperative lateral radiographs were analyzed to determine medial and lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS). Side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity between injured and uninjured limbs was measured at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: The median SI of quadriceps grafts was significantly greater than hamstring grafts at 3 months after ACLR ( P = .02). Between 3 and 9 months, the median SI of quadriceps grafts decreased ( P < .001), while that of hamstring grafts did not significantly change ( P = .55). The lateral PTS was significantly correlated with median SI measurements at 3 and 9 months such that greater lateral PTS values were associated with greater median SI. The side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity decreased for the quadriceps group ( P = .04) between 6 and 12 months but did not change for the hamstring group ( P = .88). Conclusion: The median SI of quadriceps grafts significantly decreased on MRI between 3 and 9 months after ACLR, while the median SI of hamstring grafts did not significantly change. The change in MRI appearance of the quadriceps grafts was paralleled by a reduction in anterior knee laxity between 6 and 12 months after surgery. In the absence of standardized imaging techniques and imaging analysis methods, the role of MRI in determining graft maturation, and the implications for progression through rehabilitation to return to sport, remain uncertain.

Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis in revision ACL reconstruction does not influence the outcome of patients with low-grade anterior knee laxity

Introduction There is limited evidence on the indications of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in revision ACLR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the LET in patients with revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity. Methods Between 2013 and 2018, 78 patients who underwent revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity [≤ 5 mm side-to-side difference (SSD)] were included in the retrospective cohort study. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 23 patients during revision ACLR and patients were clinically examined with a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery. Postoperative failure of the revision ACLR was defined as SSD in Rolimeter® testing ≥ 5 mm or pivot-shift grade 2/3. Results In total, failure of the revision ACLR occurred in 11.5% (n = 9) of the cases at a mean follow-up of 28.7 ± 8.8 (24–67) months. Patients with an additional LET and revision ACLR did not show a significantly reduced failure rate (13% vs. 11%) or an improved clinical outcome according to the postoperative functional scores or pain in regards to patients with an isolated revision ACLR (Tegner 5.7 ± 1.3 vs. 5.9 ± 1.5, n.s.; IKDC 77.5 ± 16.2 vs. 80.1 ± 14.9, n.s., Lysholm 81.9 ± 14.2 vs. 83.8 ± 14.5, n.s.; VAS 1.9 ± 2.2 vs. 1.2 ± 1.7, n.s.). Conclusions An additional LET in patients with revision ACLR with low-grade anterior knee laxity does not influence patient-related outcomes or failure rates. Subjects with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity may not benefit from a LET in revision ACLR. Level of evidence III

MRI findings of acute anterior instability of the knee in the absence of recent trauma

Background Anterior knee instability is usually encountered in the context of trauma, with the clinical examination and imaging focusing on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption. Limited data exist on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of acute anterior knee instability in the absence of recent trauma. Purpose To provide the first comprehensive account of MRI findings in acute anterior knee laxity in the absence of acute trauma and to evaluate predictors of ACL integrity and pain. Material and Methods A total of 84 consecutive patients with non-traumatic knee instability were prospectively studied. Instability was assessed with Lachman’s, pivot shift, and Lelli’s tests. MRI findings were recorded, and ACL integrity was surgically confirmed in all 24 cases of MRI suggesting tear and in 21/60 cases of MRI suggesting no tear. Binary logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of ACL tears and pain, and Mann–Whitney U test served for comparisons between continuous variables. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results Osteoarthritis and notch bony outgrowth (NBO) were present in 44% and 42.9% of all knees, respectively. NBO did not correlate with osteoarthritis ( P = 0.606). NBO (odds ratio [OR] = 4.157; P = 0.016) and ACL grafts (OR = 9.277; P = 0.01) predisposed to non-traumatic ACL tears (torn in 28.6% of total cases). Presence of osteoarthritis was predictive of pain (OR = 17.671; P < 0.001). Conclusion We present a comprehensive analysis of MRI findings in clinically significant non-traumatic anterior instability, showing that NBO and ACL grafts predispose in non-traumatic ACL tears, whereas osteoarthritis is the only predictor of pain.

Effect of Tibial Tunnel Placement Using the Lateral Meniscus as a Landmark on Clinical Outcomes of Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: It remains unclear if use of the lateral meniscus anterior horn (LMAH) as a landmark will produce consistent tunnel positions in the anteroposterior (AP) distance across the tibial plateau. Purpose: To evaluate the AP location of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction tibial tunnels utilizing the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark and to examine how tunnel placement affects knee stability and clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 98 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts between March 2013 and June 2017. Patients with unilateral ACL injuries and a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in the study. All guide pins for the tibial tunnel were placed using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark. Guide pins were evaluated with the Bernard-Hertel grid in the femur and the Stäubli-Rauschning method in the tibia. Patients were divided by the radiographic location of the articular entry point of the guide pin with relation to the anterior 40% of the tibial plateau. Outcomes were evaluated by the Marx Activity Scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Anterior knee laxity was evaluated using a KT-1000 arthrometer and graded with the objective portion of the IKDC form. Rotational stability was evaluated using the pivot-shift test. Results: A total of 60 patients were available for follow-up at a mean 28.6 months. The overall percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel was 39.3% ± 3.8% (mean ± SD; range, 31%-47%). Side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity was significantly lower in the anterior group than the posterior group (1.2 ± 1.1 mm vs 2.5 ± 1.3 mm; P < .001; r = 0.51). The percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel demonstrated a positive medium correlation with side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity as measured by a KT-1000 arthrometer ( r = 0.430; P < .001). The anterior group reported significantly better distribution of IKDC grading as compared with the posterior group (26 grade A and 6 grade B vs 15 grade A and 13 grade B; P = .043; V = 0.297). The pivot-shift test results and outcome scores showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intraoperative landmark yields a wide range of tibial tunnel locations along the tibial plateau, with anterior placement of the tibial tunnel leading toward improved anterior knee stability.

Relationship Between Anterior Knee Laxity and General Joint Laxity During the Menstrual Cycle

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has been reported to have a higher incidence in women than in men. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to examine the relationship of anterior knee laxity (AKL), stiffness, and generalized joint laxity (GJL) with respect to the menstrual cycle. It was hypothesized that AKL and GJL would increase during the ovulation phase, when estrogen levels are high. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 15 female university students aged >20 years and with normal menstrual cycles were evaluated. AKL was measured as anterior tibial displacement of the femur after application of 44-, 89-, and 133-N loads to the tibia. Stiffness was calculated as Δ force/Δ displacement at loads between 44 and 89 N and between 89 and 133 N. The University of Tokyo joint laxity test was used for evaluation of GJL. The participants’ menstrual cycle was divided into the early follicular, late follicular, ovulation, and luteal phases using the basal body temperature method and an ovulation kit; AKL and GJL were measured once during each phase. Participants were also stratified according to the presence or absence of genu recurvatum (GR). Results: There was no significant difference in AKL, stiffness, or GJL among the menstrual phases. In the GR group, AKL values at 89 N and 133 N were significantly higher in the ovulation phase than in the early follicular phase ( P = .025 and P =.018, respectively); there were no significant differences in AKL among the phases in the non-GR group. In addition, the GR group in the ovulation phase had significantly higher AKL values at 44 N, 89 N, and 133 N compared with the non-GR group ( P = .013, P = .005, and P = .010, respectively). There were no significant differences in GJL among the phases in the GR or non-GR groups. Conclusion: Women with GR may have increased AKL in the ovulation phase when compared with the early follicular phase, which may be a risk factor for ACL injury. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study suggest that the ovulation phase may be related to the greater incidence of ACL injuries in women.

Relationship of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Volume and T2* Relaxation Time to Anterior Knee Laxity

Background: High anterior knee laxity (AKL) has been prospectively identified as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Given that ACL morphometry and structural composition have the potential to influence ligamentous strength, understanding how these factors are associated with greater AKL is warranted. Hypothesis: Smaller ACL volumes combined with longer T2* relaxation times would collectively predict greater AKL. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: College-aged active male (n = 20) and female (n = 30) participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and AKL testing. T2-weighted MRI scans were used to assess ACL volumes, and T2* relaxation times were used to assess ACL structural composition. AKL was measured via a commercial knee arthrometer. Forward stepwise linear regression with sex and weight (first step; suppressor variables) as well as ACL volume and T2* relaxation time (second step; independent variables) was used to predict AKL (dependent variable). Results: After initially adjusting for sex and weight ( R 2 = 0.19; P = .006), smaller ACL volumes combined with longer T2* relaxation times collectively predicted greater AKL ( R 2 = 0.52; P < .001; R 2 Δ = 0.32; P Δ < .001). A smaller ACL volume was the primary predictor of greater AKL ( R 2 Δ = 0.28; P < .001), with a longer T2* relaxation time trending toward a significant contribution to greater AKL ( R 2 Δ = 0.04; P = .062). After adjusting for ACL volume and T2* relaxation time, sex (partial r = 0.05; P = .735) and weight (partial r = 0.05; P = .725) were no longer significant predictors. Conclusion: AKL was largely predicted by ACL volume and to a lesser extent by T2* relaxation time (and not a person’s sex and weight). These findings enhance our understanding of how AKL may be associated with a structurally weaker ACL. The current study presents initial evidence that AKL is a cost-effective and clinically accessible measure that shows us something about the structural composition of the ACL. As AKL has been consistently shown to be a risk factor for ACL injuries, work should be done to continue to investigate what AKL may tell a clinician about the structure and composition of the ACL.

Slope-Correction Osteotomy with Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Highly Effective in Treating High-Grade Anterior Knee Laxity

Background: Both an elevated posterior tibial slope (PTS) and high-grade anterior knee laxity are often present in patients who undergo revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, and these conditions are independent risk factors for ACL graft failure. Clinical data on slope-correction osteotomy combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) do not yet exist. Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and slope-correction osteotomy combined with LET. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, we performed a 2-stage procedure: slope-correction osteotomy was performed first, and then revision ACLR in combination with LET was performed in 22 patients with ACLR failure and high-grade anterior knee laxity. Twenty patients (6 women and 14 men; mean age, 27.8 ± 8.6 years; range, 18-49 years) were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 30.5 ± 9.3 months (range, 24-56 months), in this retrospective case series. Postoperative failure was defined as a side-to-side difference of ≥5 mm in the Rolimeter test and a pivot-shift grade of 2 or 3. Results: The PTS decreased from 15.3° to 8.9°, the side-to-side difference decreased from 7.2 to 1.1 mm, and the pivot shift was no longer evident in any of the patients. No patients exhibited revision ACLR failure and all patients showed good to excellent postoperative functional scores (mean ± SD: visual analog scale, 0.5 ± 0.6; Tegner, 6.1 ± 0.9; Lysholm, 90.9 ± 6.4; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] Symptoms, 95.2 ± 8.4; KOOS Pain, 94.7 ± 5.2; KOOS Activities of Daily Living, 98.5 ± 3.2; KOOS Function in Sport and Recreation, 86.8 ± 12.4; and KOOS Quality of Life, 65.4 ± 14.9). Conclusion: Slope-correction osteotomy in combination with LET is a safe and reliable procedure in patients with high-grade anterior knee laxity and a PTS of ≥12°. Normal knee joint stability was restored and good to excellent functional scores were achieved after a follow-up of at least 2 years.