Arthroscopic Bankart repair with all-suture anchors does not cause important glenoid bone osteolysis: a volumetric CT study of 143 anchors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán ◽  
Rosa Vega Rodriguez ◽  
Jorge Díaz Heredia ◽  
Roque Pérez Expósito ◽  
Irene Zarcos Paredes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Volumetric Ct

Arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene M. Wolf ◽  
Richard M. Wilk ◽  
John C. Richmond
Keyword(s):  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotless suture anchors: A comparison of the permanent and absorbable types

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-207
Author(s):  
Abdulrahman D Algarni
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) using two types of knotless suture anchors (KSAs) in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability (AGHI). Methods: Thirty-two patients underwent an ABR using KSAs: a permanent KSA (PushLock) and an absorbable counterpart (BioKnotless). There were 16 patients in each group. Pre-and post-operative assessment for shoulder function using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant–Murley scores, recurrence of instability, post-operative limitation of external rotation (ER) and ability to return to pre-injury level were recorded in both groups. Results: Both groups displayed significant improvements in functional scores ( p < 0.0001) without a significant difference between the groups. Of the 32 patients, 9.4% had recurrence of instability (one re-dislocation in group 1 and two symptomatic subluxations in group 2). Return to pre-injury level occurred in 87.5% and 81.3% of group 1 and group 2, respectively. There was 2° to 3° loss of ER after ABR in both groups; the difference between the groups was not significant ( p = 0.45). Conclusion: ABR for recurrent AGHI using a permanent or absorbable KSA offers comparable successful outcomes; no significant statistical difference was found.

scholarly journals Functional outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability based on suture anchor configuration

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Madan Ballal ◽  
Tarun Jayakumar
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Scores

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to evaluate the functional outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability to assess whether the number and position of suture anchors plays a role in determining the functional outcome.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a prospective study on 32 patients operated with arthroscopic Bankart repair between December 2017 to April 2019. Pre-op and regular follow-up scores were measured at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-op using Rowe score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score to assess functional outcome.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Mean age of the study group was 24.5±6.9 years. Functional outcome as determined by Rowe score and ASES score at 6 months follow-up were found to be 90.5±7.2 and 85.9±14.1 respectively when compared to the pre-op scores of 23.2±8.2 and 47.9±5.7 respectively; all of which showed highly significant functional improvement with highly significant reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Patients had no recurrent dislocations with mean external rotation limitation of 5<sup>o</sup>. 25 (78.1%) patients had two suture anchors inserted and 7 (21.9%) patients had multiple (&gt;2) anchors; and when analysis was done, there was no statistically significant difference between number of suture anchors used with respect to the functional scores.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We conclude that arthroscopic Bankart repair is a useful and successful procedure. Patient identification and selection remains the key in determining the success of repair. Meticulous surgical technique and correct positioning of suture anchors may help in reducing the number of anchors without compromising on the final functional outcome, thereby reducing the economic burden on patients.</p>

Postoperative evaluation of drill holes for arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors by the use of computed tomography

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahito Yoshida ◽  
Hideyuki Goto ◽  
Masahiro Nozaki ◽  
Yasuhiro Nishimori ◽  
Tetsuya Takenaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Postoperative Evaluation ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Drill Holes

scholarly journals Evaluation of arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent shoulder dislocation

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 675
Author(s):  
R. G. Asutosh Mohapatra ◽  
Jitendra Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Recurrent Dislocation ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
The Mean

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Our aim was to study the surgical and functional outcome and postoperative shoulder motion following, arthroscopic repair of the Bankart lesion of the shoulder with suture anchors.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a study of arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with suture anchors in 20 patients. Most of patients had symptoms for a period ranging from 1 to 2 years and 1- 4 recurrent dislocation episodes preoperatively. Necessary radiological and haematological investigations were done. The post-operative x-rays were evaluated and the post-operative rehabilitation evaluation done at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year, for any recurrence of symptoms.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> In our study of 20 patients, with the mean follow up period of 12 months, the mean Rowe score post-operatively improved to 94 from a pre-operative mean score of 56.25. Out of 20 patients none had episodes of recurrent dislocation. In 15 patients 3 suture anchors were used and in 5 patients 2 suture anchors used intra operatively. The range of movement – external rotation in 90º of abduction improved in 17 patients (85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We concluded that arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with suture anchors is effective in providing better shoulder function with range of movement and lower rate of recurrence.</p>

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using a Lasso-Loop Stitch

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Konrads ◽  
Stefan Döbele
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Bony Defect ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Arthroscopic Stabilization ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Refixation ◽  
Very High

Anterior inferior shoulder dislocation is a common injury. After primary traumatic shoulder dislocation and conservative treatment, the risk of re-dislocation is very high in patients younger than 35 years. With age, the risk of re-dislocation after traumatic shoulder dislocation and conservative treatment decreases. Surgical treatment via either open or arthroscopic stabilization minimizes the risk of re-dislocation. Today, anterior shoulder stabilization by arthroscopic refixation of the labroligamentous complex with suture anchors is a standard procedure, if there is no severe chronic bony defect at the glenoid site. Lafosse et al. described the so-called „Lasso-loop stitch“. This technique allows for positioning of the knot away from the joint and at the same time it establishes a labral bump that stabilizes the humeral head against (sub)luxation. The surgical principle and aim consist of refixation of the anterior labrum-capsule-ligament complex to the glenoid with positioning of the knot at distance to the joint as well as bulging up the labrum. This stabilizes the shoulder joint and therefore avoids further dislocations and associated pathologies. The aim of this work is to give an illustrated instruction of the surgical technique of arthroscopic Bankart repair using the lasso-loop stitch.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document