No differences in 10-year clinical outcomes and quality of life between patients with different mediolateral femoral component positions in fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Jun Woo ◽  
Ming Han Lincoln Liow ◽  
Ngai Nung Lo ◽  
Seng Jin Yeo ◽  
Jerry Yongqiang Chen
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Central Implantation of the Femoral Component Relative to the Tibial Insert Improves Clinical Outcomes in Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 3108-3116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Kamenaga ◽  
Koji Takayama ◽  
Kazunari Ishida ◽  
Shinya Hayashi ◽  
Ryosuke Kuroda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Tibial Insert

scholarly journals Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Fixed Bearing Implant

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e26
Author(s):  
Philip Winnock de Grave ◽  
Thomas Luyckx ◽  
Alexander Ryckaert ◽  
Jan Noyez ◽  
Paul Gunst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Mobile Versus Fixed Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Series of 375 Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Murphy ◽  
Tyler Fraser ◽  
William Mihalko
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Lateral Compartment ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Component Loosening

Introduction: We sought to compare outcomes, complications and survival between mobile and fixed bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in a large multi-surgeon group.Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent a medial UKA were queried between March 2003 and August 2012. Variables investigated included final range of motion (ROM), type of complication, and overall survivorship. Results: 375 medial UKAs were analyzed (308 mobile bearing and 67 fixed bearing). Average time to follow-up was 47 months. Final ROM was comparable (mobile: 1-122°, fixed: 1-120°, p = 0.34). Complications occurred in 20/308 (6.6%) mobile bearing UKA and 5/67 (7.5%) fixed bearing UKA (p = 0.77). The most common complications in mobile bearing implants were progression of lateral compartment disease and component loosening. The complications in fixed bearing implants were arthrofibrosis and tibial plateau fracture. Overall survivorship differed, but not significantly (mobile: 94.8%, fixed: 96.9%, p = 0.44). Discussion: In this largest reported cohort series comparing mobile versus fixed bearing UKA, we found no significant difference in final clinical knee range of motion, rates of complications, and survivorship between the two bearing types. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document