US immigration policy and brain waste

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayoung Kim ◽  
Brigitte S. Waldorf ◽  
Natasha T. Duncan
Keyword(s):  
Immigration Policy ◽  
Us Immigration

Promoting entry of high-quality workers through US immigration policy

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (52) ◽  
pp. 5045-5059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Brunner ◽  
Joseph Pate
Keyword(s):  
Immigration Policy ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Us Immigration

scholarly journals Creating Cohesive, Coherent Immigration Policy

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia M. Orrenius ◽  
Madeline Zavodny
Keyword(s):  
Immigration Policy ◽  
Economic Perspective ◽  
Initial Design ◽  
Unauthorized Immigration ◽  
Key Features ◽  
New Policies ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Us Immigration

US immigration policy has serious limitations, particularly when viewed from an economic perspective. Some shortcomings arise from faulty initial design, others from the inability of the system to adapt to changing circumstances. In either case, a reluctance to confront politically difficult decisions is often a contributing factor to the failure to craft laws that can stand the test of time. We argue that, as a result, some key aspects of US immigration policy are incoherent and mutually contradictory —new policies are often inconsistent with past policies and undermine their goals. Inconsistency makes policies less effective because participants in the immigration system realize that lawmakers face powerful incentives to revise policies at a later date. US policies regarding unauthorized immigration, temporary visas, and humanitarian migrants offer examples of incoherence and inconsistency. This article explores key features of an integrated, coherent immigration policy from an economic perspective and how policymakers could better attempt to achieve policy consistency across laws and over time.

A Nation of Immigrants?

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-492
Author(s):  
Julie Avril Minich
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Immigration Policy ◽  
Asylum Seekers ◽  
Historical Context ◽  
Current Situation ◽  
Border Enforcement ◽  
Humanitarian Crisis ◽  
Immigration Restriction ◽  
A Current ◽  
Us Immigration

Abstract With US immigration policy seeming ever more brutal with each new headline, it becomes increasingly tempting to advocate for the rights of migrants and asylum seekers by presenting the current situation as extraordinary and questioning the legitimacy of the Trump administration’s border enforcement tactics. Jay Timothy Dolmage, Katherine Benton-Cohen, and Beth Lew-Williams, however, show that the contemporary moment is far from exceptional; rather, immigration restriction in North America has long mobilized exclusionary nativist logics and shifting constructions of legality. Timely without being ripped from the headlines, their latest books offer much-needed historical context for a current humanitarian crisis along with important lessons from previous crises.

Migration, Border Security, and New Forms of Resistance in the Age of Trump*

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera
Keyword(s):  
Present Article ◽  
Immigration Policy ◽  
Border Security ◽  
Security Policies ◽  
National Politics ◽  
Protest Movements ◽  
Popular Resistance ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Immigration

The present article analyzes the responses to US border security policies and particularly US immigration policy by activists, migrants, and progressive actors during the Trump era. It explains new forms of popular resistance in the US and south of its border, as well as their effects in national politics, policies and geopolitics. This analysis focuses on migrant caravans and related protest movements. Finally, this article provides preliminary explanations of such phenomena that include considerations of geopolitics, philanthropy, and the plausible utilization of counterinsurgency tactics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document