A sensitivity method to analyze the volumetric error of five-axis machine tool

2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (5-8) ◽  
pp. 1791-1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingzhao Li ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Yunfeng Jiang ◽  
Hai Li ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Qiang Cheng ◽  
Ziling Zhang ◽  
Guojun Zhang ◽  
Peihua Gu ◽  
Ligang Cai

Machining accuracy of a machine tool is influenced by geometric errors produced by each part and component. Different errors have varying influence on the machining accuracy of a tool. The aim of this study is to optimize errors to get a desired performance for a numerical control machine tool. Applying multi-body system theory, a volumetric error model was constructed to track and compensate effects of errors during operation of the machine, and to relate the functional specifications on volumetric accuracy to the permissible errors on the joints and links of the machine. Error sensitivity analysis was used to identify the influence of different errors (especially the errors which have large influences) on volumetric error. Based on First Order and Second Moment theory, an error allocation approach was developed to optimize allocation of manufacturing and assembly tolerances along with specifying the operating conditions to determine the optimal level of these errors so that the cost of controlling them and the cost of failure to meet the specifications is minimized. The approach developed was implemented in software and an example of the geometric errors budgeting for a five-axis machine was discussed. It is identified that the different optimal standard deviations reflect the cost-weighted influences of the respective parameters in the equations of the functional requirements. This study suggests that it is possible to determine the coupling relationships between these errors and optimize the allowable error budgeting between these sources.


2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua-Wei Ko ◽  
Patrick Bazzoli ◽  
J. Adam Nisbett ◽  
Douglas Bristow ◽  
Yujie Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract A parameter identification procedure for identifying the parameters of a volumetric error model of a large machine tool requires hundreds of random volumetric error components in its workspace and thus takes hours of measurement time. It causes thermal errors of a large machine difficult to be tracked and compensated periodically. This paper demonstrates the application of the optimal observation design theories to volumetric error model parameter identification of a large five-axis machine. Optimal designs maximize the amount of information carried in the observations. In this paper, K-optimal designs are applied for the construction of machine-tool error observers by determining locations in the workspace at which 80 components of volumetric errors to be measured so that the model parameters can be identified in 5% of an 8-h shift. Many of optimal designs tend to localize observations at the boundary of the workspace. This leaves large volumes of the workspace inadequately represented, making the identified model inadequate. Therefore, the constrained optimization algorithms that force the distribution of observation points in the machine’s workspace are developed. Optimal designs reduce the number of observations in the identification procedure. This opens up the possibility of tracking thermal variations of the volumetric error model with periodic measurements. The design, implementation, and performance of a constrained K-optimal in tracking the thermal variations of the volumetric error over a 400-min period of operation are also reported. About 70–80% of machine-tool error can be explained using the proposed thermal error modeling methodology.


2013 ◽  
Vol 284-287 ◽  
pp. 1723-1728
Author(s):  
Shih Ming Wang ◽  
Han Jen Yu ◽  
Hung Wei Liao

Error compensation is an effective and inexpensive way that can further enhance the machining accuracy of a multi-axis machine tool. The volumetric error measurement method is an essential of the error compensation method. The measurement of volumetric errors of a 5-axis machine tool is very difficult to be conducted due to its complexity. In this study, a volumetric-error measurement method using telescoping ball-bar was developed for the three major types of 5-axis machines. With the use of the three derived error models and the two-step measurement procedures, the method can quickly determine the volumetric errors of the three types of 5-axis machine tools. Comparing to the measurement methods currently used in industry, the proposed method provides the advantages of low cost, easy setup, and high efficiency.


Author(s):  
Le Ma ◽  
Douglas Bristow ◽  
Robert Landers

Abstract Machine tool geometric errors are frequently corrected by populating compensation tables that contain position-dependent offsets to each commanded axis position. While each offset can be determined by directly measuring the individual geometric error at that location, it is often more efficient to compute the compensation using a volumetric error model derived from measurements across the entire workspace. However, interpolation and extrapolation of measurements, once explicit in direct measurement methods, become implicit and obfuscated in the curve fitting process of volumetric error methods. The drive to maximize model accuracy while minimizing measurement sets can lead to significant model errors in workspace regions at or beyond the range of the metrology equipment. In this paper, a novel method of constructing machine tool volumetric error models is presented in which the characteristics of the interpolation and extrapolation errors are constrained. Using a typical five-axis machine tool compensation methodology, a constraint bounding the tool tip modeled error slope is added to the error model identification process. By including this constraint over the entire space, the geometric errors over the interpolation space are still well-identified. Also, the model performance over the extrapolation space is consistent with the behavior of the geometric error model over the interpolation space. The methodology is applied to an industrial five-axis machine tool. In the experimental implementation, for measurements outside of the measured region, an unconstrained model increases the mean residual by 40% while the constrained model reduces the mean residual by 40%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document