Preoperative level II/III MRI measures predicting long-term prolapse recurrence after native tissue repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payton Schmidt ◽  
Luyun Chen ◽  
John O. DeLancey ◽  
Carolyn W. Swenson
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Preoperative Level ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Prolapse Recurrence ◽  
Level Ii

scholarly journals Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sissel H. Oversand ◽  
Anne Cathrine Staff ◽  
Anny E. Spydslaug ◽  
Rune Svenningsen ◽  
Ellen Borstad
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Severe pelvic organ prolapse treated by vaginal native tissue repair: long-term analysis of outcomes in 146 patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 295 (4) ◽  
pp. 917-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Carlo Schiavi ◽  
Giorgia Perniola ◽  
Violante Di Donato ◽  
Virginia Sibilla Visentin ◽  
Flaminia Vena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Term Analysis

scholarly journals Impact of age on mid- to long-term outcomes of transvaginal native tissue repair for apical vaginal prolapse

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 2860-2866
Author(s):  
Lindsay M. Kissane ◽  
Isuzu Meyer ◽  
Kimberly D. Martin ◽  
Jubilee C. Tan ◽  
Kathryn Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Vaginal Prolapse ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue

Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes?

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1313-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Li Ow ◽  
Yik N. Lim ◽  
Peter L. Dwyer ◽  
Debjyoti Karmakar ◽  
Christine Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Vaginal Prolapse ◽  
Transvaginal Mesh ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue

scholarly journals Efficacy of native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: long-term results

2016 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. e18-e19
Author(s):  
Ruby Martinello ◽  
Chiara Borghi ◽  
Giulia Bernardi ◽  
Gennaro Scutiero ◽  
Gloria Bonaccorsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1279-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Jonsson Funk ◽  
Anthony G. Visco ◽  
Alison C. Weidner ◽  
Virginia Pate ◽  
Jennifer M. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Vaginal Wall ◽  
Anterior Vaginal Wall ◽  
Vaginal Mesh ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue

scholarly journals Comparison of treatment outcomes for native tissue repair and sacrocolpopexy as apical suspension procedures at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumin Oh ◽  
E. Kyung Shin ◽  
Sowoon Hyun ◽  
Myung Jae Jeon
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Uterine Prolapse ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Apical Suspension ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Surgical Failure

AbstractConcomitant apical suspension should be performed at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse to reduce the risk of recurrent prolapse. Native tissue repair (NTR) and sacrocolpopexy (SCP) are commonly used apical suspension procedures; however, it remains unclear which one is preferred. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of NTR and SCP in terms of surgical failure, complication and reoperation rates. Surgical failure was defined as the presence of vaginal bulge symptoms, any prolapse beyond the hymen, or retreatment for prolapse. This retrospective cohort study included 523 patients who had undergone NTR (n = 272) or SCP (n = 251) along with hysterectomy for uterine prolapse and who had at least 4-month follow-up visits. During the median 3-year follow-up period, the surgical failure rate was higher in the NTR group (21.3% vs 6.4%, P < 0.01), with a low rate of retreatment in both groups. Overall complication rates were similar, but complications requiring surgical correction under anesthesia were more common in the SCP group (7.2% vs 0.4%, P < 0.01). As a result, the total reoperation rate was significantly higher in the SCP group (8.0% vs 2.6%, P = 0.02). Taken together, NTR may be a preferred option for apical suspension when hysterectomy is performed for uterine prolapse.

Sexual Function Following Trocar‐guided Mesh or Vaginal Native Tissue Repair in Recurrent Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2944-2953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo L. Milani ◽  
Mariella I.J. Withagen ◽  
Hok S. The ◽  
Ileana Nedelcu‐van der Wijk ◽  
Mark E. Vierhout
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Sexual Function ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Recurrent Prolapse ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Native Tissue

Vaginal Native Tissue Repair for Posterior Compartment Prolapse

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Carlo Schiavi ◽  
Ottavia DʼOria ◽  
Pierangelo Faiano ◽  
Giovanni Prata ◽  
Anna Di Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Posterior Compartment ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document