A prospective study of discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and proximal femur bone densitometry

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. O'Gradaigh ◽  
I. Debiram ◽  
S. Love ◽  
H.K. Richards ◽  
J.E. Compston
2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1033-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Marchetti ◽  
Gerald G. Steinberg ◽  
James M. Greene ◽  
Louis G. Jenis ◽  
Daniel T. Baran

Public Health ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Grimley Evans ◽  
Irene Wandless ◽  
Derek Prudham

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3.2) ◽  
pp. 194-199
Author(s):  
Dr. Sujai S ◽  
Dr. Akshay TM ◽  
Dr. Momin Bin Latheef ◽  
Dr. Nataraj G ◽  
Dr. MK Siddalinga Swamy

Author(s):  
B. L. Chopra ◽  
Krishan Kumar ◽  
B. L. Khajotia ◽  
Ravindra Bhambu ◽  
Sunil Bhatiwal ◽  
...  

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Fractures of the proximal femur are relatively common injuries in adults and common source of morbidity and mortality among the elderly. Fractures of the proximal femur include trochantric and subtrochantric fractures. The present study was designed to evaluate and analyze the role of proximal femoral nail (PFN) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">It was a prospective study on 125 cases of proximal femoral fractures. The fractures were classified according to AO classification. Salvati and Wilson Score were used for functional assessment</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">In this study at 6 months follow up, union was achieved in 123 cases, open reduction was performed in 11% of cases (14 cases). Technical and mechanical complications were noted in 21% cases (27 cases). Reoperation rate was 4% (Five cases). According to Salvati and Wilson scoring system excellent results were seen in 36% of cases (45 cases), good results in 46% cases (58 cases), fair result in 13% cases (16 cases) and poor results in 5% cases (6 cases)</span><span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">It is concluded from our study that proximal femoral nailing is an attractive and suitable implant for Proximal Femoral Fractures and its use in unstable intertrochantric fractures is very encouraging</span><span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 3151-3153
Author(s):  
Maratib Ali ◽  
Badaruddin Sahito ◽  
rfan Muahmmad Rajput ◽  
Dileep Kumar ◽  
Nauman Hussain ◽  
...  

Background: Wagner proximal femur prosthesis is the versatile modular implant. Study Design: Prospective study Setting: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Dow University of Health Sciences / Civil Hospital Karachi, from January 2013 to December 2019. Methodology: Total 19 patients of both genders with proximal femur bone loss due to tumor, implant failure for proximal femur fixation, comminuted intertrochanteric fracture, and failed arthroplasty included in the study. After taking written informed consent, detailed demographics including age, gender, indication of wagner prosthesis, and wagner stem type were recorded. Among all the patients 11 patients received total hip replacement and 8 patients received bipolar. Complications associated with procedure were recorded. Outcomes were assessed by Merle D Aubgine scale. Results: Total 19 patients were included in the study who were operated with wagner prosthesis for proximal femur bone deficit problems. 7 (37%) patients were male and 12 (67%) were female , between age of 16 to 70. 13 (68%) patient have proximal femur problem on right side and 6(32%) patient on left side .10 Patient have proximal femur fixation problems and 9 with proximal femur tumor. Modular wagner prosthesis used in all patients . Per-operative one (5%) patient have perforation of cortex and One (5%)patient posterior hip dislocation on next day . Two (11%) patient had per-operative fracture . Maximum follow-up is from 6.3 years to minimum 6 months. One patient with metastasis died within four weeks of surgery. Outcome measured with modified Merle D Aubgine scale showed no excellent , good in 15(79%) , fair 3 (16%), poor 1(5%). Conclusion: Wagner proximal femur modular implant is a versatile implant for proximal femur fixation failure and after proximal femur resection in tumor patients. It is modular with variable options to make stable hip joint. It is cheap as comparative to proximal femur replacement implant for tumor. Keywords: Implant failure, Proximal femur, Tumor, Wagner implant.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1935-1942 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-A. Schürch ◽  
R. Rizzoli ◽  
B. Mermillod ◽  
H. Vasey ◽  
J.P. Michel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document