scholarly journals Motives of moduli spaces on K3 surfaces and of special cubic fourfolds

2018 ◽  
Vol 161 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 109-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim-Henrik Bülles
Keyword(s):  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
K3 Surfaces

scholarly journals K-MODULI OF CURVES ON A QUADRIC SURFACE AND K3 SURFACES

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-41
Author(s):  
KENNETH ASCHER ◽  
KRISTIN DEVLEMING ◽  
YUCHEN LIU
Keyword(s):  
Complete Intersection ◽  
Moduli Space ◽  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
K3 Surfaces ◽  
Moduli Of Curves ◽  
Quadric Surface ◽  
Intersection Curves

Abstract We show that the K-moduli spaces of log Fano pairs $\left(\mathbb {P}^1\times \mathbb {P}^1, cC\right)$ , where C is a $(4,4)$ curve and their wall crossings coincide with the VGIT quotients of $(2,4)$ , complete intersection curves in $\mathbb {P}^3$ . This, together with recent results by Laza and O’Grady, implies that these K-moduli spaces form a natural interpolation between the GIT moduli space of $(4,4)$ curves on $\mathbb {P}^1\times \mathbb {P}^1$ and the Baily–Borel compactification of moduli of quartic hyperelliptic K3 surfaces.

scholarly journals Moduli spaces of twisted K3 surfaces and cubic fourfolds

2020 ◽  
Vol 377 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 1453-1479
Author(s):  
Emma Brakkee
Keyword(s):  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
K3 Surfaces

scholarly journals On the non-divisorial base locus of big and nef line bundles on K3[2]-type varieties

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Ulrike Rieß
Keyword(s):  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
Hilbert Scheme ◽  
Ample Line Bundle ◽  
Base Point ◽  
K3 Surfaces ◽  
Line Bundles ◽  
Codimension Two ◽  
Base Locus ◽  
Base Loci ◽  
Symplectic Varieties

Abstract We approach non-divisorial base loci of big and nef line bundles on irreducible symplectic varieties. While for K3 surfaces, only divisorial base loci can occur, nothing was known about the behaviour of non-divisorial base loci for more general irreducible symplectic varieties. We determine the base loci of all big and nef line bundles on the Hilbert scheme of two points on very general K3 surfaces of genus two and on their birational models. Remarkably, we find an ample line bundle with a non-trivial base locus in codimension two. We deduce that, generically in the moduli spaces of polarized K3[2]-type varieties, the polarization is base point free.

scholarly journals On Some Generalized Rapoport–Zink Spaces

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111-1187
Author(s):  
Xu Shen
Keyword(s):  
Moduli Space ◽  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
K3 Surfaces ◽  
Connected Components ◽  
Shimura Varieties ◽  
Reductive Groups ◽  
Mixed Characteristic ◽  
Special Fibers ◽  
Type Spaces ◽  
Local Invariants

AbstractWe enlarge the class of Rapoport–Zink spaces of Hodge type by modifying the centers of the associated $p$-adic reductive groups. Such obtained Rapoport–Zink spaces are said to be of abelian type. The class of Rapoport–Zink spaces of abelian type is strictly larger than the class of Rapoport–Zink spaces of Hodge type, but the two type spaces are closely related as having isomorphic connected components. The rigid analytic generic fibers of Rapoport–Zink spaces of abelian type can be viewed as moduli spaces of local $G$-shtukas in mixed characteristic in the sense of Scholze.We prove that Shimura varieties of abelian type can be uniformized by the associated Rapoport–Zink spaces of abelian type. We construct and study the Ekedahl–Oort stratifications for the special fibers of Rapoport–Zink spaces of abelian type. As an application, we deduce a Rapoport–Zink type uniformization for the supersingular locus of the moduli space of polarized K3 surfaces in mixed characteristic. Moreover, we show that the Artin invariants of supersingular K3 surfaces are related to some purely local invariants.

The Cohomology of Moduli Spaces of K3 Surfaces of Degree 2 (II)

1989 ◽  
Vol s3-58 (3) ◽  
pp. 559-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Kirwan ◽  
Ronnie Lee
Keyword(s):  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
K3 Surfaces

The Euler number of certain primitive Calabi–Yau threefolds

2000 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
MEI-CHU CHANG ◽  
HOIL KIM
Keyword(s):  
Moduli Space ◽  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
K3 Surfaces ◽  
Physical Models ◽  
Ample Divisor ◽  
K3 Surface ◽  
Superstring Theory ◽  
Two Parameters

Recently Calabi–Yau threefolds have been studied intensively by physicists and mathematicians. They are used as physical models of superstring theory [Y] and they are one of the building blocks in the classification of complex threefolds [KMM]. These are three dimensional analogues of K3 surfaces. However, there is a fundamental difference as is to be expected. For K3 surfaces, the moduli space N of K3 surfaces is irreducible of dimension 20, inside which a countable number of families Ng with g [ges ] 2 of algebraic K3 surfaces of dimension 19 lie as a dense subset. More explicitly, an element in Ng is (S, H), where S is a K3 surface and H is a primitive ample divisor on S with H2 = 2g − 2. For a generic (S, H), Pic (S) is generated by H, so that the rank of the Picard group of S is 1. A generic surface S in N is not algebraic and it has Pic (S) = 0, but dim N = h1(S, TS) = 20 [BPV]. It is quite an interesting problem whether or not the moduli space M of all Calabi–Yau threefolds is irreducible in some sense [R]. A Calabi–Yau threefold is algebraic if and only if it is Kaehler, while every non-algebraic K3 surface is still Kaehler. Inspired by the K3 case, we define Mh,d to be {(X, H)[mid ]H3 = h, c2(X) · H = d}, where H is a primitive ample divisor on a smooth Calabi–Yau threefold X. There are two parameters h, d for algebraic Calabi–Yau threefolds, while there is only one parameter g for algebraic K3 surfaces. (Note that c2(S) = 24 for every K3 surface.) We know that Ng is of dimension 19 for every g and is irreducible but we do not know the dimension of Mh,d and whether or not Mh,d is irreducible. In fact, the dimension of Mh,d = h1(X, TX), where (X, H) ∈ Mh,d. Furthermore, it is well known that χ(X) = 2 (rank of Pic (X) − h1(X, TX)), where χ(X) is the topological Euler characteristic of X. Calabi–Yau threefolds with Picard rank one are primitive [G] and play an important role in the moduli spaces of all Calabi–Yau threefolds. In this paper we give a bound on c3 of Calabi–Yau threefolds with Picard rank 1.

K3 Surfaces

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Huybrechts
Keyword(s):  
Moduli Spaces ◽  
Special Class ◽  
K3 Surfaces ◽  
Derived Categories ◽  
K3 Surface ◽  
Hodge Structures ◽  
Surface Theory ◽  
Torelli Theorem ◽  
Stable Sheaves ◽  
Moduli Theory

After abelian varieties, K3 surfaces are the second most interesting special class of varieties. These have a rich internal geometry and a highly interesting moduli theory. Paralleling the famous Torelli theorem, results from Mukai and Orlov show that two K3 surfaces have equivalent derived categories precisely when their cohomologies are isomorphic weighing two Hodge structures. Their techniques also give an almost complete description of the cohomological action of the group of autoequivalences of the derived category of a K3 surface. The basic definitions and fundamental facts from K3 surface theory are recalled. As moduli spaces of stable sheaves on K3 surfaces are crucial for the argument, a brief outline of their theory is presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document