Surgical approaches to chronic pancreatitis: indications and imaging findings

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1980-1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Hafezi-Nejad ◽  
Vikesh K. Singh ◽  
Stephen I. Johnson ◽  
Martin A. Makary ◽  
Kenzo Hirose ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 1738-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica M. Dua ◽  
Brendan C. Visser

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison L Yang ◽  
Julia McNabb-Baltar

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a subcategory of chronic pancreatitis that is highly responsive to steroids. The term was first proposed in 1995 by Yoshida and colleagues, and since its discovery, the diagnosis of AIP has dramatically increased. AIP is a chronic fibroinflammatory disease characterized by lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates and fibrosis on histology. There are two distinct subtypes: type 1 AIP is the pancreatic manifestation of a systemic serum immunoglobulin G subtype 4–related disease (IgG4-RD) and type 2 AIP is described clinically as idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis and has no association with IgG4. Clinically, AIP presents most commonly as obstructive jaundice in type 1 AIP and can present as acute pancreatitis in type 2 AIP. The diagnostic criteria include histology, imaging findings, and responsiveness to steroids as well as laboratory findings and other organ involvement. The mainstay of treatment is steroid therapy, with immunomodulators such as rituximab used for maintenance or relapsing disease. Long-term complications of AIP include pancreatic insufficiency and are often associated with relapsing disease. This review contains 45 references, 1 figure, and 2 tables. Key Words: autoimmune pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, EUS-guided biopsy, IgG4, immunomodulatory, obstructive jaundice, pancreas mass, steroid


2007 ◽  
pp. 315-322
Author(s):  
Hans G. Beger ◽  
Bernd Mhling ◽  
Naoki Hiki ◽  
Zhengfei Zhou ◽  
Zhanbing Liu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forrester D. Lensing ◽  
Travis A. Abele ◽  
Walavan Sivakumar ◽  
Philipp Taussky ◽  
Lubdha M. Shah ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 170 (3) ◽  
pp. 643-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Van Hoe ◽  
S Gryspeerdt ◽  
N Ectors ◽  
W Van Steenbergen ◽  
R Aerts ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 552-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Mel Wilcox ◽  
Dhiraj Yadav ◽  
Tian Ye ◽  
Timothy B. Gardner ◽  
Andres Gelrud ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Darren Fitzpatrick ◽  
Catherine Petchprapa ◽  
Leon Rybak

Three cases of PIN palsy following biceps repair are presented with clinical and imaging correlation. The imaging findings in these cases will be discussed and the orthopedic literature, as regards possible surgical approaches and technical factors believed to predispose to or prevent this complication, will be reviewed. It is important for radiologists to serve as consultants in these uncommon but sometimes devastating complications, helping to quickly and accurately recognize the imaging findings corresponding to the clinical symptoms and aiding the surgeon in diagnosis and treatment by identifying the possible causes and sites of nerve compression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document