Functional assessment of combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner with a single femoral tunnel: a two-year minimum follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 543-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilo Partezani Helito ◽  
Marcelo Batista Bonadio ◽  
Marco Kawamura Demange ◽  
Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque ◽  
José Ricardo Pécora ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0012
Author(s):  
Sinan Zehir ◽  
Ercan Şahin ◽  
Murat Çalbıyık ◽  
Mahmut Kalem ◽  
Deniz İpek ◽  
...  

Objectives: Many fixation techniques are currently in use for femoral side graft fixation at ACL reconstruction surgery. Short term success following ACL reconstruction highly depends on fixation strength of the graft. In this study we report short term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using double hamstring tendon autograft using double cross pin for femoral tunnel fixation. Methods: Between years 2009 and 2013, 51 male adult anterior cruciate ligament injury cases treated surgically, in a single center, with at least one year follow up were investigated. Professional athletes, multi-ligamentous instability cases, cases requiring meniscus repair or further treatment for chondral injuries and cases with concomitant medial and lateral meniscus lesions were not included in the study. Femoral tunnel was prepared anatomically through accessory medial portal, opened medially and distally. Reconstruction was performed using double loop hamstring tendon autograft. Femoral side was fixed using double cross pin, whereas tibial side was secured using single biodegradable interference screw and titanium staple. No external immobilization method such as brace was administered. Patients were encouraged to bear weight as tolerated. Standard physiotherapy was instructed to all patients postoperatively. All cases were evaluated clinically at the end of at least one year follow-up. Clinical and functional evaluation consisted of pivot shift and Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and Tegner activity evaluation systems. Results: Mean age was 28.4 (18-39) years. Mean time between the injury and reconstruction was 13 (3-21) weeks. Average duration of surgery was 48 (35-70) minutes. No case of graft failure or posterior cortical fracture was encountered. In two cases, infection was treated successfully with local debridement and antibiotics with retention of the graft. At the end of follow-up period, none of the cases demonstrated positive pivot shift test. Pre-operative and follow-up Lysholm scores were 58.3±6.7 and 87.1±5.3 (p<0.001) respectively. Pre-operative IKDC scores were evaluated as C at 37 cases and D at 14, whereas, follow-up IKDC scores were evaluated as A at 42 cases, B at 8 and C at 1 case. Pre-operative and follow-up Tegner scores were 3.7±0.6 and 6.7±0.4 (p<0.001) respectively. Conclusion: Although fixation strength of transcondylar graft fixation techniques has been questioned over loop systems with cortical fixation, it was reported that transcondylar fixation causes less tunnel widening at long term. Our study revealed successful short term results, with femoral tunnel preparation using accessory medial portal and double cross pin femoral fixation, allowing early weight bearing and rehabilitation without graft and fixation failure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (09) ◽  
pp. 898-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Dini ◽  
Laura de Girolamo ◽  
Massimo Cattani ◽  
Michele Rosa ◽  
Paolo Adravanti

AbstractSingle-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasingly used in a large number of patients and it allows obtaining very good clinical and subjective results; however, functional tests show a persistent rotational instability. Biomechanical studies seem to indicate that double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction allows to obtain increased anterior and rotational stability compared with SB. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to compare the clinical outcome and the possible osteoarthritic evolution of patients treated either with a SB (freehand transtibial femoral tunnel) or with a DB technique (outside-in for posterolateral femoral tunnel/inside-out for anteromedial femoral tunnel) at a final follow-up of 6 years. A total of 60 patients with complete ACL rupture (age, 16–40 years) were prospectively randomized to SB (n = 30) or DB (n = 30) groups. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and after surgery at 6 months, 1, 3, and 6 years with Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, and KT-2000 (Medmetric Corp). The degree of osteoarthritis (OA) based on the Kellgren–Lawrence grade was also assessed. No significant differences in background factors between the two groups were observed. Homogeneity was also found in term of preoperative Lysholm score, IKDC, and KT-2000 between SB and DB groups. After 6 months from surgery, both groups showed significant improvements for Lysholm, IKDC, and KT-2000 score with respect to preoperative observations (p < 0.001); however, no significant differences have been observed in term of postoperative values between SB and DB groups at each time point (6-year evaluation: Lysholm score 98.14 ± 10.03 and 97.22 ± 12.82; IKDC normal + nearly normal 95 and 100%; KT-2000 1.68 ± 1.26 and 1.03 ± 1.92 for SB and DB, respectively; all p > 0.05). At the final follow-up, three patients (11.11%) in the DB group and two patients (7.69%) in the SB group presented signs of OA progression. Our study did not reveal any advantages in using DB ACL reconstruction in mid- to long-term follow-up in term of clinical outcome and knee stability, as well as in term of OA progression.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Metso ◽  
Kirsi-Maaria Nyrhinen ◽  
Ville Bister ◽  
Jerker Sandelin ◽  
Arsi Harilainen

Abstract Background: This study compares long term results of two femoral bone tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The femoral tunnel can be drilled transtibially (TT) or through an anteromedial portal (AM). Methods: 300 patients with ACL reconstructions were chosen for this study. They were divided into two groups: 150 patients with anteromedial drilling (AM) and 150 with transtibial (TT) drilling. In the AM group the reconstructions were performed using semitendinosus graft with Tape Locking Screw (TLS™) technique (n=87) or Retrobutton™ femoral and BioScrew™ tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft (n=63). In the TT group the fixation method used was Rigidfix™ femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores (Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC) and instrumented laxity measurements (KT-2000™). Our aim was to evaluate if there is a better rotational stability and therefore better clinical results when using AM drilling. Results: In the AM group there were 18 and in the TT group 17 revision procedures which were excluded from the study, leaving 132 patients in the AM group and 133 in the TT group for evaluation. In the one year follow-up there were 90 patients (68,2 %) in the AM group and 86 patients (64,7 %) in the TT group. In the two year follow-up there were 60 (45,5 %) and 58 (43,6 %) patients, respectively. The Tegner activity level was consistently higher in the TT group from preoperatively to two year follow-up postoperatively (p < 0.05). The IKDC score was better at two year follow-up in the TT group (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis was done using the BMDP Statistical Package (Statistical Solutions Ltd, Cork, Ireland). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference in IKDC score at two year follow-up, in favor of the TT drilling group compared with the AM group (p < 0.05). No other differences were found between these groups. Both drilling techniques resulted in improved patient performance and patient satisfaction. Also, we found no data supporting the hypothesis that AM drilling technique provides better rotational stability to the knee. Trial registration: ISRCTN16407730 Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; clinical outcome; anteromedial; transtibial


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. e285-e288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio J. Angelini ◽  
Camilo Partezani Helito ◽  
Mateus R. Tozi ◽  
Leonardo Pozzobon ◽  
Marcelo Batista Bonadio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document