scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Results of Anteromedial and Transtibial Femoral Tunnel Drilling in ACL Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Metso ◽  
Kirsi-Maaria Nyrhinen ◽  
Ville Bister ◽  
Jerker Sandelin ◽  
Arsi Harilainen
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Rotational Stability ◽  
Tibial Fixation ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Background: This study compares long term results of two femoral bone tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The femoral tunnel can be drilled transtibially (TT) or through an anteromedial portal (AM). Methods: 300 patients with ACL reconstructions were chosen for this study. They were divided into two groups: 150 patients with anteromedial drilling (AM) and 150 with transtibial (TT) drilling. In the AM group the reconstructions were performed using semitendinosus graft with Tape Locking Screw (TLS™) technique (n=87) or Retrobutton™ femoral and BioScrew™ tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft (n=63). In the TT group the fixation method used was Rigidfix™ femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores (Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC) and instrumented laxity measurements (KT-2000™). Our aim was to evaluate if there is a better rotational stability and therefore better clinical results when using AM drilling. Results: In the AM group there were 18 and in the TT group 17 revision procedures which were excluded from the study, leaving 132 patients in the AM group and 133 in the TT group for evaluation. In the one year follow-up there were 90 patients (68,2 %) in the AM group and 86 patients (64,7 %) in the TT group. In the two year follow-up there were 60 (45,5 %) and 58 (43,6 %) patients, respectively. The Tegner activity level was consistently higher in the TT group from preoperatively to two year follow-up postoperatively (p < 0.05). The IKDC score was better at two year follow-up in the TT group (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis was done using the BMDP Statistical Package (Statistical Solutions Ltd, Cork, Ireland). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference in IKDC score at two year follow-up, in favor of the TT drilling group compared with the AM group (p < 0.05). No other differences were found between these groups. Both drilling techniques resulted in improved patient performance and patient satisfaction. Also, we found no data supporting the hypothesis that AM drilling technique provides better rotational stability to the knee. Trial registration: ISRCTN16407730 Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; clinical outcome; anteromedial; transtibial

scholarly journals Preliminary Results in Anatomic All-inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (s2) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Octav Russu ◽  
Tiberiu Bățagă ◽  
Andrei-Marian Feier ◽  
Radu Prejbeanu ◽  
Radu Fleaca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
X Rays ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common lesions in knee traumatology; therefore the number of ACL reconstructions is increasing worldwide. Usually, an anteromedial (AM) accessory portal is required in anatomical positioning of the femoral tunnel, which is not absolutely necessary in this technique. Aim: Assessment of all-inside ACL reconstruction preliminary clinical results with adjustable loops and buttons on both femoral and tibial surfaces. Method: Our prospective study included 28 subjects (19 male, 9 female) with chronic ACL ruptures. The mean age of the study population was 27.72 ± 8.23 years. In all cases ACL reconstruction was carried out with the use of quadrupled semitendinosus auto-grafts with adjustable loops and buttons on the femoral and tibial surfaces and anatomic placement of both tunnels, using an outside-in technique, with flipcutters (Arthrex®). Clinical and radiological evaluations were carried out before surgery and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, with the Lysholm scoring system, the Tegner activity scale and anterior-posterior and latero-lateral X-rays. Anterior knee laxity was measured in 25° of flexion using a portable arthrometer (RolimeterTM, Aircast®) and maximum manual force. Results: During the final follow-up, the Lysholm score was good and excellent in 27 cases, with a mean Lysholm score of 95.55 ± 4.63; all results were classified as good. The mean preoperative Tegner activity score was 3.46 ± 1.71 (range: 1-7), and the post-operative mean score was 5.75 ± 2.24 (range: 2-10). We found no graft ruptures. Preoperative knee laxity measurements showed a mean displacement of 11.5 ± 3.1 mm and side-to-side differences of 5.6 ± 3.5 mm, while the postoperative measurements at the last follow-up were 6.3 ± 1.54 mm and 2.65 ± 1.86 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Short-term clinical outcomes of all-inside ACL restoration with anatomic placement femoral and tibial tunnels seem to recommend this surgical option, with good subjective and objective results. Additional research will have to prove the long-term success.

Miniplate Suture Button Augmentation for Soft Tissue Graft Tibial Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-285
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Tibial Fixation ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Soft Tissue Graft ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Supplemental Fixation

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires reliable and rigid graft fixation. Tibial-sided fixation is frequently cited as the “weak point” of the femur-graft-tibia construct. Some authors have recommended supplemental fixation with a staple or screw suture to post improve the strength and stiffness of the fixation. However, with these fixations, there is a risk for symptomatic hardware. Miniplate is flatter than screw or staple and does not penetrate the bone when attached. It is used as a button for suspensory fixation to enhance interference screw tibial fixation. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the miniplate suture button for supplemental soft tissue graft tibial fixation in ACL reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out between August 2016 and December 2019. A total of 40 patients had undergone primary ACL reconstruction, performed with hamstring tendon grafts that were secured using a miniplate suture button for supplemental interference screw tibial fixation. A total of 18 patients were excluded, leaving 22 patients at 1-year follow-up. Results: At least 1-year follow-up, the remaining 22 patients had significant difference between preoperative and postoperative outcome of anterior drawer test, Lachman test and pivot shift test (p<0.05). Lysholm knee scores improved significantly from 54.0±12.53 to 90.04±5.38. However, 3 patients (13.6%) experienced symptomatic hardware pain and 3 patients (13.6%) tendered around the miniplate site. There were no radiographic changes in miniplate displacement, deformed or broken plate, and bony reaction around miniplate. Conclusion: The use of a miniplate suture button as a supplemental fixation showed adequate fixation strength and showed good results in postoperative manual ligament laxity test and functional scores at minimum 1-year follow-up. However, there is still symptomatic pain at the hardware site. Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Supplemental fixation, Suture button

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Results of Anteromedial and Transtibial Femoral Tunnel Drilling in ACL Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Metso ◽  
Kirsi-Maaria Nyrhinen ◽  
Ville Bister ◽  
Jerker Sandelin ◽  
Arsi Harilainen
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Rotational Stability ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Tibial Fixation ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Semitendinosus Graft ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Drilling

Abstract Background: This study compares long term results of femoral tunnel drilling between anteromedial (AM) and transtibial (TT) techniques in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Methods: 300 patients with ACL reconstructions were chosen to this study from previously collected data of ACL reconstructions.They were divided into two groups: 150 patients with AM and 150 with TT drilling. In the AM group the reconstructions were performed using semitendinosus graft with Tape Locking Screw (TLS™) technique (n=87) or Retrobutton™ femoral and BioScrew™ tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft (n=63). In the TT group the fixation method used was Rigidfix™ femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores (Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC) and instrumented laxity measurements (KT-2000™). Our aim was to evaluate if there is a better rotational stability and therefore better clinical resultswhen using AM drilling compared to TT drilling. Results: Revision procedures were excluded from the study. There were 132 patients in the AM group and 133 in the TT group for evaluation. In the two year follow-up there were 60 patients in the AM group (45,5 %) and 58 in the TT group (43,6 %). There were no statistically significant differences found between the groups. Conclusion: Both drilling techniques resulted in improved patient performance and patient satisfaction. We found no data supporting the hypothesis that AM drilling technique provides better rotational stability to the knee. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN16407730. Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; clinicaloutcome; anteromedial; transtibial

Single-Bundle versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial with 6-Year Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (09) ◽  
pp. 898-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Dini ◽  
Laura de Girolamo ◽  
Massimo Cattani ◽  
Michele Rosa ◽  
Paolo Adravanti
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractSingle-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasingly used in a large number of patients and it allows obtaining very good clinical and subjective results; however, functional tests show a persistent rotational instability. Biomechanical studies seem to indicate that double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction allows to obtain increased anterior and rotational stability compared with SB. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to compare the clinical outcome and the possible osteoarthritic evolution of patients treated either with a SB (freehand transtibial femoral tunnel) or with a DB technique (outside-in for posterolateral femoral tunnel/inside-out for anteromedial femoral tunnel) at a final follow-up of 6 years. A total of 60 patients with complete ACL rupture (age, 16–40 years) were prospectively randomized to SB (n = 30) or DB (n = 30) groups. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and after surgery at 6 months, 1, 3, and 6 years with Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, and KT-2000 (Medmetric Corp). The degree of osteoarthritis (OA) based on the Kellgren–Lawrence grade was also assessed. No significant differences in background factors between the two groups were observed. Homogeneity was also found in term of preoperative Lysholm score, IKDC, and KT-2000 between SB and DB groups. After 6 months from surgery, both groups showed significant improvements for Lysholm, IKDC, and KT-2000 score with respect to preoperative observations (p < 0.001); however, no significant differences have been observed in term of postoperative values between SB and DB groups at each time point (6-year evaluation: Lysholm score 98.14 ± 10.03 and 97.22 ± 12.82; IKDC normal + nearly normal 95 and 100%; KT-2000 1.68 ± 1.26 and 1.03 ± 1.92 for SB and DB, respectively; all p > 0.05). At the final follow-up, three patients (11.11%) in the DB group and two patients (7.69%) in the SB group presented signs of OA progression. Our study did not reveal any advantages in using DB ACL reconstruction in mid- to long-term follow-up in term of clinical outcome and knee stability, as well as in term of OA progression.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Results in Superior Rotational Stability Compared with Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High Grade Pivoting Sport Patients: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ştefan Mogoş ◽  
Riccardo D'Ambrosi ◽  
Dinu Antonescu ◽  
Ioan-Cristian Stoica
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Rotational Stability ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractThe purpose of the current randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction and to compare them with those of isolated ACL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that combined ACL and ALL reconstruction will result in superior clinical outcomes in terms of the rotational stability of the knee. This prospective RCT included 57 patients (44 men and 13 women, mean age = 31 ± 7.1 years) who underwent ACL reconstruction either isolated (Group I: 25 patients) or combined with ALL reconstruction (Group II: 32 patients). The evaluation of the patients was done preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months including a clinical examination (Lachman's test, Pivot shift's test, and Rolimeter differential anterior laxity), an objective clinical scores (objective: the International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score) and a subjective clinical scores (subjective: IKDC's score, Lysholm's score, and Tegner's activity score). Postoperative complications of all the patients were recorded. There was a significant difference between the study groups at all follow-up intervals when evaluating the postoperative pivot shift test (p < 0.05) with a superior rotational stability in the group of combined ACL and ALL reconstruction. At the final follow-up evaluation, 36% of the patients from Group I and 6.2% in Group II had a grade I positive pivot shift test (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of patients with a grade A IKDC objective score (p < 0.05) at the 6- and 12-month follow-up intervals (p = 0.007). There was a significant difference concerning the IKDC subjective score between the two study groups in favor of the combined ACL and ALL reconstruction group at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.048). Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction technique was demonstrated to be effective in obtaining a superior control of the rotational knee instability and to improve the clinical objective and subjective outcomes when compared with isolated ACL reconstruction in sports patients with high-grade pivoting shifts.

scholarly journals How to repair an immediately post-operative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure? About a clinical case

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1219
Author(s):  
Joao Estves ◽  
Joao Maia Rosa ◽  
Luis Barros ◽  
Ana Ribau ◽  
Paulo Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Lateral Wall ◽  
Femoral Fixation ◽  
Tibial Fixation ◽  
Graft Harvest ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

<p class="abstract">We present a 23-year-old male with an early anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure due to lateral wall blow-out, diagnosed on day one post-op. We were able to perform the revision using the original graft, and maintaining the initial tibial fixation, revising only the femoral fixation. At 1-year follow-up the patient is asymptomatic. In the early ACL reconstruction failures due to femoral wall blowout, it is possible to perform the revision surgery using the same graft and maintaining the same tibial fixation. This avoids de morbidity of a new graft harvest and the need for a new tibial tunnel.</p>

scholarly journals Correlation of Femoral Tunnel Length with Body Height, Limb Length, and Thigh Length in Indian Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-288
Author(s):  
Ravi Gupta ◽  
Anubhav Malhotra ◽  
Pawan Kumar ◽  
Gladson David Masih
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Limb Length ◽  
Tunnel Length ◽  
Indian Patients ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Hamstrings Tendon

Purpose To measure the femoral tunnel length created through a far medial portal and determine its correlation with body height, limb length, and thigh length in 404 Indian patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods 364 male and 40 female Indian patients aged 18 to 51 (mean, 26.8) years underwent ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon using the hamstrings tendon autograft. Their body height, limb length, and thigh length were measured by a single assessor, as was the femoral tunnel length. Results The mean femoral tunnel length was 34.5 mm. It was <30 mm in 28 patients and <25 mm in 2 patients. The correlation coefficients of the femoral tunnel length with body height, limb length, and thigh length were 0.485 (p<0.0001), 0.426 (p<0.0001), and 0.304 (p<0.0001). No patient had posterior wall blowout fracture. Conclusion The femoral tunnel length positively correlated with body height, limb length, and thigh length in 404 Indian patients.

Twenty-Year Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Prospectively Collected Data

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110273
Author(s):  
Joshua S. Everhart ◽  
Sercan Yalcin ◽  
Kurt P. Spindler
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Function ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Several long-term (≥20 years) follow-up studies after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been published in recent years, allowing for a systematic evaluation of outcomes. Purpose: To summarize outcomes at ≥20 years after ACL reconstruction and identify patient and surgical factors that affect these results. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Prospective studies of primary ACL reconstructions with hamstring or bone–patellar tendon—bone (BTB) autograft via an arthroscopic or a mini-open technique and with a mean follow-up of ≥20 years were identified. When possible, the mean scores for each outcome measure were calculated. Factors identified in individual studies as predictive of outcomes were described. Results: Five studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria with a total of 2012 patients. The pooled mean follow-up for patient-reported outcome measures was 44.2% (range, 29.6%-92.7%) and in-person evaluation was 33.2% (range, 29.6%-48.9%). Four studies (n = 584) reported graft tears at a mean rate of 11.8% (range, 2%-18.5%) and 4 studies (n = 773) reported a contralateral ACL injury rate of 12.2% (range, 5.8%-30%). Repeat non-ACL arthroscopic surgery (4 studies; n = 177) to the ipsilateral knee occurred in 10.4% (range, 9.5%-18.3%) and knee arthroplasty (1 study; n = 217) in 5%. The pooled mean of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee function (IKDC) score was 79.1 (SD, 21.8 [3 studies; n = 644]). In 2 studies (n?= 221), 57.5% of patients continued to participate in strenuous activities. The IKDC-objective score was normal or nearly normal in 82.3% (n = 496; 3 studies), with low rates of clinically significant residual laxity. Moderate-severe radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) (IKDC grade C or D) was present in 25.9% of patients (n = 605; 3 studies). Medial meniscectomy is associated with increased risk of radiographic OA. Radiographic OA severity is associated with worse patient-reported knee function, but the association with knee pain is unclear. Conclusion: Currently available prospective evidence for ACL reconstruction with hamstring or BTB autograft provides several insights into outcomes at 20 years. The rates of follow-up at 20 years range from 30% to 93%. IKDC-objective scores were normal or nearly normal in 82% and the mean IKDC-subjective score was 79 points.

scholarly journals GRAFT CHOICE FOR ADOLESCENT ATHLETES RETURNING TO HIGH-RISK SPORTS: A MATCHED COHORT ANALYSIS OF PATELLAR TENDON AND HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0007
Author(s):  
Crystal Perkins ◽  
Michael Busch ◽  
Melissa Christino ◽  
Belinda Schaafsma ◽  
S. Clifton Willimon
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Graft Rupture ◽  
Graft Choice ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Graft selection for skeletally mature adolescents undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is guided by surgeon and patient preference. In young patients returning to high-risk cutting and pivoting sports, graft rupture is the most feared complication of ACL reconstruction. Some studies have demonstrated slightly lower rates of graft failure and decreased laxity in the short term associated with patellar tendon (BTB) autografts as compared to hamstring (HS) autografts, but these studies are limited by their heterogeneity of ages and activity level1-3. The purpose of this study is to compare the rates of graft failure between BTB and HS ACL reconstruction cohorts matched by age, sex, and sport. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients less than 19 years of age treated with ACL reconstructions using either patellar tendon (BTB) or hamstring (HS) autograft performed by a single surgeon. Skeletally mature or nearly mature patients in “high-risk” ACL injury sports (basketball, football, soccer, lacrosse, and gymnastics) were initially treated with hamstring autografts but the graft preference transitioned to BTB autografts as the preferred graft choice during the study period. This transition in graft preference for adolescents participating in “high risk” sports allows for a comparison of outcomes based on graft types. Inclusion criteria were ages 13 – 18 years, participation in a “high risk” sport, and minimum 6-month follow-up. The two cohorts of patients were matched by age, gender, and sport. The primary outcome measure was graft rupture. Results: One hundred fifty-two patients with an average age of 16 years (range 13 – 18 years) underwent ACL reconstruction during the study period. There were 71 BTB reconstructions and 81 HS reconstructions. There were 64 females and 88 males. There was no difference in age, sex, BMI, or laterality between groups. There were more patients who played soccer in the BTB cohort (44%) vs HS cohort (20%) and fewer who played basketball in the BTB cohort (24%) vs HS cohort (41%), p = 0.005. There were no differences between the BTB and HS cohorts in terms of meniscus tears (61% v 72%, p = 0.15), meniscus repair (21% v 32%, p = 0.13), or partial meniscectomy (32% v 33%, p = 0.90). Mean duration of follow-up was 28 months (range 7-57 months). There was no difference in follow-up between cohorts (BTB 28 months and HS 29 months, p = 0.19). There were a total of 16 graft ruptures (10.5%). There was no difference in the rate of graft rupture between cohorts (BTB 8.5% vs HS 12.3%, p = 0.60). Mean time to graft rupture was 21 months (range 8 – 35 months) and Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated no difference between cohorts. Conclusions: ACL reconstruction in adolescents returning to high-risk sports can be performed utilizing BTB or HS autografts with similar rates of graft rupture. There is a trend toward lower rates of graft rupture associated with BTB autografts, but additional patients will be necessary to determine if this trend will become a statistically significant difference. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84(9):1503-1513. Ho B, Edmonds EW, Chambers HG et al. Risk factors for early ACL reconstruction failure in pediatric and adolescent patients: a review of 561 cases. J Pediatr Orthop 2016. Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, et al. Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475(10):2459-2468.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcome, Return to Pre-injury Activities and Patients Satisfaction after Open ACL Reconstruction And Arthroscopic Reconstruction; An Experience From A Developing Country

2020 ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Prof. Shehzad Javed ◽  
Dr. Muhammad Farrukh Bashir ◽  
Dr. Zubair Khalid ◽  
Dr. Umair Ahmed ◽  
Prof Amer Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Open Technique ◽  
Arthroscopic Reconstruction ◽  
Open Procedure ◽  
Patients Satisfaction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Introduction: There are two techniques for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), open technique and arthroscopic assisted technique. Arthroscopic assisted technique has many advantages over open procedure but it needs more expertise and cost comparatively.The objective of this study is to identify the clinical outcomes on basis of lyshlomknee score (LKS) system and find out patients satisfaction after performing both procedures in two groups separately. Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 600 patients undergoing open ACL reconstruction and arthroscopic reconstruction from 2005 to 2018 was done, at the Department of Orthopaedics, Ghurki Hospital, Lahore. We included all those patients who were 18 to 45 years of age and had at least 1 year follow up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document