Outcome of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Open Abdomen Treatment After Nontraumatic Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery: Analysis of Factors Affecting Delayed Fascial Closure in 101 Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 774-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Anders Bertelsen ◽  
Rasmus Fabricius ◽  
Jakob Kleif ◽  
Bent Kristensen ◽  
Ismail Gögenur
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Factors Affecting

scholarly journals Greater Success of Primary Fascial Closure of the Open Abdomen: A Retrospective Study Analyzing Applied Surgical Techniques, Success of Fascial Closure, and Variables Affecting the Results

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kääriäinen ◽  
M. Kuuskeri ◽  
M. Helminen ◽  
H. Kuokkanen
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Component Separation ◽  
Separation Technique ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Component Separation Technique

Background and Aims: The open abdomen technique is a standard procedure in the treatment of intra-abdominal catastrophe. Achieving primary abdominal closure within the initial hospitalization is a main objective. This study aimed to analyze the success of closure rate and the effect of negative pressure wound therapy, mesh-mediated medial traction, and component separation on the results. We present the treatment algorithm used in our institution in open abdomen situations based on these findings. Material and Methods: Open abdomen patients (n = 61) treated in Tampere University Hospital from May 2005 until October 2013 were included in the study. Patient characteristics, treatment prior to closure, closure technique, and results were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The first group included patients in whom direct or bridged fascial closure was achieved, and the second group included those in whom only the skin was closed or a free skin graft was used. Background variables and variables related to surgery were compared between groups. Results and Conclusion: Most of the open abdomen patients (72.1%) underwent fascial defect repair during the primary hospitalization, and 70.5% of them underwent direct fascial closure. Negative pressure wound therapy was used as a temporary closure method for 86.9% of the patients. Negative pressure wound therapy combined with mesh-mediated medial traction resulted in the shortest open abdomen time (p = 0.039) and the highest fascial repair rate (p = 0.000) compared to negative pressure wound therapy only or no negative pressure wound therapy. The component separation technique was used for 11 patients; direct fascial closure was achieved in 5 and fascial repair by bridging the defect with mesh was achieved in 6. A total of 8 of 37 (21.6%) patients with mesh repair had a mesh infection. The negative pressure wound therapy combined with mesh-mediated medial traction promotes definitive fascial closure with a high closure rate and a shortened open abdomen time. The component separation technique can be used to facilitate fascial repair but it does not guarantee direct fascial closure in open abdomen patients.

scholarly journals Prospective Assessment of the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy of the Open Abdomen

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Hutan ◽  
Christian Bartko ◽  
Augustin Prochotsky ◽  
Jaroslav Sekac ◽  
Jan Skultety ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Prospective Assessment ◽  
Sequential Closure

Open abdomen (OA) is a surgical approach, that emerged in last 15 years, with its management being complicated, timely and financially demanding, burdened with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, several publications proved superiority of usage of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over usage of conventional temporary abdominal closure techniques in treatment of open abdomen. Different aspects of treatment of OA with NPWT remain to be assessed and stated.Authors of the paper prospectively assessed group of 48 patients with OA, managed by one surgeon with NPWT between 2006-2014, assessing mortality and morbidity in the group stratified by indication for OA, type of sequential closure of OA, presence and management of concomitant enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF), maximal values of C-reactive protein (CRP) and Procalcitonine (PCT), and initial body mass index (BMI). Mortality of the whole group was 35.41%, rate of fascial closure 45.83% and rate of the wound closure 83.33%. Incidence of the fistula was 37.5%, of these 66.67% were successfully locally managed. Incidence of fascial closure without use of sequential closure was significantly lower as opposed to use of different techniques of sequential closure.Unsuccessful local management of EAF is significant predictor of mortality. All other data were not found to be statistically significant. Identifying specific aspects of treatment of OA by NPWT, significantly improving outcomes, and adhering to these aspects in clinical practice will further ameliorate outcomes.

scholarly journals Factors influencing the fascial closure rate after open abdomen treatment: Results from the European Hernia Society (EuraHS) Registry

Hernia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Willms ◽  
◽  
R. Schwab ◽  
M. W. von Websky ◽  
F. Berrevoet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
European Hernia Society

Abstract Purpose Definitive fascial closure is an essential treatment objective after open abdomen treatment and mitigates morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of evidence on factors that promote or prevent definitive fascial closure. Methods A multi-center multivariable analysis of data from the Open Abdomen Route of the European Hernia Society included all cases between 1 May 2015 and 31 December 2019. Different treatment elements, i.e. the use of a visceral protective layer, negative-pressure wound therapy and dynamic closure techniques, as well as patient characteristics were included in the multivariable analysis. The study was registered in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform via the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRK00021719). Results Data were included from 630 patients from eleven surgical departments in six European countries. Indications for OAT were peritonitis (46%), abdominal compartment syndrome (20.5%), burst abdomen (11.3%), abdominal trauma (9%), and other conditions (13.2%). The overall definitive fascial closure rate was 57.5% in the intention-to-treat analysis and 71% in the per-protocol analysis. The multivariable analysis showed a positive correlation of negative-pressure wound therapy (odds ratio: 2.496, p < 0.001) and dynamic closure techniques (odds ratio: 2.687, p < 0.001) with fascial closure and a negative correlation of intra-abdominal contamination (odds ratio: 0.630, p = 0.029) and the number of surgical procedures before OAT (odds ratio: 0.740, p = 0.005) with DFC. Conclusion The clinical course and prognosis of open abdomen treatment can significantly be improved by the use of treatment elements such as negative-pressure wound therapy and dynamic closure techniques, which are associated with definitive fascial closure.

scholarly journals EP.FRI.337 Active management of the open abdomen in non-trauma catastrophes, including use of negative pressure wound therapy, is associated with high primary fascial closure rates

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dheepa Nair ◽  
Jessica Banks ◽  
Richard Guy
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Enterocutaneous Fistula ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Primary Fascial Closure

Abstract Aims Deliberate use of the open abdomen (OA) following emergency laparotomy (EL) may be life-saving in the non-trauma abdominal catastrophe (NTAC) and damage control surgery (DCS) can reduce the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome in compromised patients. Controversy exists over optimum management of the abdominal wall. An audit was undertaken of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in OA patients. Methods All patients who underwent OA management of NTAC from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2020 were identified. Data on patient demographics, indication for OA and clinical outcomes were analysed. Results Eighteen patients (median age 65.5 years; M:F9 each) underwent OA  following EL. The indications were: bowel ischaemia (8), intra-abdominal sepsis (5), grossly distended bowel (3) and intra-abdominal haemorrhage (2). In all cases, ABTHERATM dressings (KCI/Acelity) were used. Mean ICU stay was 7.4 days (range 1-15) and mean hospital stay 33 days (range 2-61). Four patients died, 3 within 24 hours of initial EL. Relook laparotomy was performed within 48 hours in the remaining 15 patients; 3 patients required 2 relooks and 1 patient had three. Primary fascial closure (PFC) was achieved within five days in 13/14 (93%) survivors. Eight patients had SSIs with 2 intra-abdominal collections and all were treated conservatively. One patient developed an enterocutaneous fistula. Conclusions The use of commercially-available NPWT dressings in OA management is associated with high PFC rates within one week of initial EL. This practice is consistent with World Society of Emergency Surgery guidance recommending planned re-look laparotomy within 48 hours.

scholarly journals Delayed Closure of Open Abdomen in Septic Patients Treated With Negative Pressure Vacuum Therapy and Dynamic Sutures: A 10-Years Follow-Up on Long-Term Complications

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Theresa Hofmann ◽  
Christopher May ◽  
Karl Glaser ◽  
René H. Fortelny
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Operating Field

Introduction: Patients with open abdomen after surgical interventions associated with the complication of secondary peritonitis are successfully treated with negative pressure wound therapy. The use of dynamic fascial sutures reduces fascial lateralization and increases successful delayed fascial closure after open abdomen treatment.Methods: In 2017 we published the follow-up results of 38 survivors out of 87 open abdomen patients treated with negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial sutures between 2007 and 2012. In our current study we present the 10-years follow-up results regarding long-term complications with the focus on incisional hernias and pain. Since 2017 seven more patients have died, hence 31 patients were included in the current study. The patients were asked to answer questions about specific long-term complications of OA treatment including pain, the presence of incisional hernias and subsequent surgical interventions. Demographic data and data regarding fascial closure after open abdomen treatment were collected. All results were analyzed quantitatively. The follow-up period was 8–13 years.Results: The median age was 69 (30–90) years, and 15 (48.4%) were females. Twenty-four patients (77.4%) responded to the questionnaire: Three patients (12.5%) suffered from pain in the original operating field, all three at rest but not during exercise. None of the patients required analgesic treatment. Eleven patients (45.8%) were found to have incisional hernias. Five out of 11 hernias (45.5%) were treated by surgery and did not declare any pain in the operating field. Among the patients with incisional hernias lower MPI (Mannheimer Peritonitis Index) at the time of primary surgery but more reoperations and treatment days were found. The technique of fascial closure was heterogenic and no differences in the occurrence of incisional hernia could be detected.Conclusion: The incidence of incisional hernias after open abdomen treatment is still high, but are associated with little pain in the original operating field. Further studies are required to investigate methods for fascial closure techniques after OA treatment.

The Use Of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) In The Management Of Enteroatmospheric Fistula – Case Report And Literature Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajmund Jaguścik ◽  
Dominik A. Walczak ◽  
Joanna Porzeżyńska ◽  
Piotr W. Trzeciak
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Metabolic Disorders ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Necrotic Pancreatitis ◽  
Enteroatmospheric Fistula

AbstractAn enteric fistula that occurs in an open abdomen is called an enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF) and is the most challenging complication for a surgical team to deal with. The treatment of EAF requires a multidisciplinary approach. First of all, sepsis has to be managed. Any fluid, electrolyte and metabolic disorders need to be corrected. Oral intake must be stopped and total parenteral nutrition introduced. The control and drainage of the effluent from the fistula is a separate issue. Since there are no fixed algorithms for the treatment of EAF, surgeons need to develop their own, often highly unconventional solutions.We present the case of a 24-year-old man who developed enteroatmospheric fistula after laparotomy and relaparotomy due to acute necrotic pancreatitis. Both the laparostomy and the fistula were successfully managed using modified negative pressure wound therapy. The literature regarding this issue was also reviewed.

scholarly journals Successful Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Necrosis Caused by a Perforated Ascending Colon Using the ABThera System

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kouki Imaoka ◽  
Takuya Yano ◽  
Yasuhiro Choda ◽  
Ko Oshita ◽  
Yuma Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh Flap ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Ascending Colon ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Pressure Therapy ◽  
New Device

Background. The practice of leaving the abdomen open after an emergency laparotomy has gained increasing popularity recently. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is known as an effective technique in the management of an open abdomen (OA). A new device, the ABThera™ Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Therapy System (KCI USA, San Antonio, TX, USA), was specifically designed to achieve a temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in the management of an OA. This study was aimed at presenting a successful experience of treating a case of abdominal wall necrosis caused by a perforated ascending colon using the ABThera System. Case Presentation. A 66-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with complaints of severe pain in the abdomen. On admission, abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed fluid collection, an air pocket in the subcutaneous fat layer of the abdominal wall, and edematous changes in the adipose tissue in the peritoneum and abdominal wall. Based on a diagnosis of peritonitis resulting from a perforated ascending colon, emergency surgery was performed. A right hemicolectomy, ileostomy construction, and debridement of the necrotic tissues were performed. However, necrotizing fasciitis rapidly spread; therefore, more necrotic tissue was debrided in a second operation. The abdominal wall defect was left open, and the ABThera System was used in the management of the OA; this device promoted wound healing. A reduction was observed in the size of the open wound with visible granulation tissue. The defect was finally covered with a mesh split-thickness skin graft and anterolateral thigh flap. Conclusions. In the management of a case of a massive wound with infection, it can be of great benefit to treat the wound with NPWT initially to decrease its size. The ABThera System could facilitate early and safe management of an OA by surgeons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document