scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short-Term Outcomes and Completeness of Resection

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Straatman ◽  
Nicole van der Wielen ◽  
Miguel A. Cuesta ◽  
Elly S. M. de Lange – de Klerk ◽  
Elise P. Jansma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Total Gastrectomy

scholarly journals Distal versus total gastrectomy for middle and lower-third gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengyan Li ◽  
Bin Bai ◽  
Fengni Xie ◽  
Qingchuan Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Comparisons of short-term and survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (32) ◽  
pp. 52366-52380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-Zu Chen ◽  
Shao-Yong Wang ◽  
Yin-Su Wang ◽  
Zi-Han Jiang ◽  
Wei-Han Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianglei Ma ◽  
Xiaoyao Li ◽  
Shifu Zhao ◽  
Ruifu Zhang ◽  
Dejun Yang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Gastrectomy ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background To date, robotic surgery has been widely used worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy (RG) in gastric cancer patients to determine whether RG can replace laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was applied to perform the study. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, WanFang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and VIP databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before May 2020 that compared RG with LG. Next, two independent reviewers conducted literature screening and data extraction. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Random effects or fixed effects models were applied according to heterogeneity. Results A total of 19 studies including 7275 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 4598 patients were in the LG group and 2677 in the RG group. Compared with LG, RG was associated with longer operative time (WMD = −32.96, 95% CI −42.08 ~ −23.84, P < 0.001), less blood loss (WMD = 28.66, 95% CI 18.59 ~ 38.73, P < 0.001), and shorter time to first flatus (WMD = 0.16 95% CI 0.06 ~ 0.27, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference between RG and LG in terms of the hospital stay (WMD = 0.23, 95% CI −0.53 ~ 0.98, P = 0.560), overall postoperative complication (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.91 ~ 1.25, P = 0.430), mortality (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.24 ~ 1.90, P = 0.450), the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD = −0.96, 95% CI −2.12 ~ 0.20, P = 0.100), proximal resection margin (WMD = −0.10, 95% CI −0.29 ~ 0.09, P = 0.300), and distal resection margin (WMD = 0.15, 95% CI −0.21 ~ 0.52, P = 0.410). No significant differences were found between the two treatments in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.76 ~ 1.18, P = 0.640), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.69 ~ 1.21, P = 0.530), and recurrence rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 ~ 1.21, P = 0.500). Conclusions The results of this study suggested that RG is as acceptable as LG in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. RG can be performed as effectively and safely as LG. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of the robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 518-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sakamoto ◽  
Michimasa Fujiogi ◽  
Hiroki Matsui ◽  
Kiyohide Fushimi ◽  
Hideo Yasunaga
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Analysis ◽  
Open Total Gastrectomy

scholarly journals Comparison of Short-term and Long-term Clinical Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsuo Shida ◽  
Norio Mitsumori ◽  
Shuichi Fujioka ◽  
Yuta Takano ◽  
Taizou Iwasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Total Gastrectomy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document