Percutaneous Balloon Pericardial Window for Patients with Symptomatic Pericardial Effusion

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 360-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loreto Garcia del Barrio ◽  
Jos� Hernando Morales ◽  
Carlos Delgado ◽  
Alberto Benito ◽  
Javier Larrache ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon

scholarly journals Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy (PBP) Revisited: A Case Report and Review of Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Raed Aqel ◽  
Muawiyah Elqadi ◽  
Ahmad Hammouri ◽  
Mohammad S. Alqadi
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Shortness Of Breath ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Severe Respiratory Distress ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon ◽  
Recurrent Pericardial Effusion

Background. A Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy (PBP) procedure is a reemerging nonsurgical technique that helps in preventing the reaccumulation of pericardial effusion. It is done percutaneously without general anaesthesia. It has been proved to be effective in alleviating and preventing recurrent pericardial effusion. Case Presentation. We reported a 52-year-old male with stage IV adenocarcinoma causing recurrent pericardial effusion. The patient experienced a worsening shortness of breath. A surgical pericardial window was denied by the surgery team secondary to severe respiratory distress; subsequently, the patient underwent Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy. Conclusion. Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy is efficacious and safe when done by well-trained physicians. We think it should be considered as a preferred treatment modality in most sicker patients with recurrent pericardial effusion.

Single center experience of pediatric percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Christopher Herron ◽  
Thomas J. Forbes ◽  
Daisuke Kobayashi
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Balloon Dilation ◽  
Restrictive Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon ◽  
Local Bleeding ◽  
Procedural Success

Abstract Background: Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy is a percutaneous procedure that creates a window in the parietal pericardium by balloon dilation. The use of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy has not been reported well in children. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the single centre experience of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy in children. Methods: This was a retrospective study to describe all the children aged <20 years undergoing percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy during an 18-year period (2001–2019). Patient characteristics, technical and ultimate procedural success, and repeat interventions were collected. Results: A total of 13 percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy’s were performed in 11 children at the median age of 12 years (range 1.8–19). The etiologies of pericardial effusion were post-pericardiotomy syndrome (n = 4), restrictive cardiomyopathy (n = 1), autoimmune diseases (n = 3), malignancy (n = 2), and idiopathic (n = 1). Two patients received two percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy. The technical success of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy was 100% with no acute adverse events (balloon rupture or local bleeding). Five (45%) required re-intervention and ultimately three required a surgical pericardial window 6 to 35 days after the percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy. As a result, ultimate procedural success rate was 73% (8/11). Conclusion: Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy was performed safely with high technical success in children. Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy may be considered for recurrent and persistent pericardial effusion, before considering a surgical pericardial window.

Percutaneous balloon pericardial window for patients with malignant pericardial effusion and tamponade

1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor F. Palacios ◽  
E. Murat Tuzcu ◽  
Andrew A. Ziskind ◽  
Jerry Younger ◽  
Peter C. Block
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Malignant Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon

The Diagnostic Value of Pericardial Fluid and Pericardial Biopsy: Single Center Experiences

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Yildirim ◽  
Recep Ustaalioglu ◽  
Murat Erkan ◽  
Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu ◽  
Hatice Demirbag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Pericardial Fluid ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
History Of ◽  
Recurrent Pericardial Effusion

<strong>Background:</strong> Patients with recurrent pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade are usually treated in thoracic surgery clinics by VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) or open pericardial window operation. The diagnostic importance of pathological evaluation of the pericardial fluid and tissue in the same patients has been reported in few studies. We reviewed pathological examination of the pericardial tissue and fluid specimens and the effect on the clinical treatment in our clinic, and compared the results with the literature. <br /><strong>Methods:</strong> We retrospectively analyzed 174 patients who underwent pericardial window operation due to pericardial tamponade or recurrent pericardial effusion. For all patients both the results of the pericardial fluid and pericardial biopsy specimen were evaluated. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed by using descriptive analysis. <br /><strong>Results:</strong> Median age was 61 (range, 20-94 years). The most common benign diagnosis was chronic inflammation (94 patients) by pericardial biopsy. History of malignancy was present in 28 patients (16.1%) and the most common disease was lung cancer (14 patients). A total of 24 patients (13.8%) could be diagnosed as having malignancy by pericardial fluid or pericardial biopsy examination. The malignancy was recognized for 12 patients who had a history of cancer; 9 of 12 with pericardial biopsy, 7 diagnosed by pericardial fluid. Twelve of 156 patients were recognized as having underlying malignancy by pericardial biopsy (n = 9) or fluid examination (n = 10), without known malignancy previously. <br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Recurrent pericardial effusion/pericardial tamponade are entities frequently diagnosed, and surgical interventions may be needed either for diagnosis and/or treatment, but specific etiology can rarely be obtained in spite of pathological examination of either pericardial tissue or fluid. For increasing the probability of a specific diagnosis both the pericardial fluid and the pericardial tissues have to be sent for pathologic examination.

scholarly journals Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade requiring pericardial window in an otherwise healthy 30-year-old patient with COVID-19: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Walker ◽  
Vincent Peyko ◽  
Charles Farrell ◽  
Jeanine Awad-Spirtos ◽  
Matthew Adamo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Cardiac Tamponade ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Healthy Woman ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Rare Presentation ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Acute Pericarditis ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

Abstract Background This case report demonstrates pericardial effusion, acute pericarditis, and cardiac tamponade in an otherwise healthy woman who had a positive test result for coronavirus disease 2019. Few case reports have been documented on patients with this presentation, and it is important to share novel presentations of the disease as they are discovered. Case presentation A Caucasian patient with coronavirus disease 2019 returned to the emergency department of our hospital 2 days after her initial visit with worsening chest pain and shortness of breath. Imaging revealed new pericardial effusion since the previous visit. The patient became hypotensive, was taken for pericardial window for cardiac tamponade with a drain placed, and was treated for acute pericarditis. Conclusion Much is still unknown about the implications of coronavirus disease 2019. With the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, research is still in process, and we are slowly learning about new signs and symptoms of the disease. This case report documents a lesser-known presentation of a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 and will help to further understanding of a rare presentation.

Video-Assisted Pericardial Fenestration for Effusions after Cardiac Surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios P Georghiou ◽  
Eyal Porat ◽  
Avi Fuks ◽  
Bernardo A Vidne ◽  
Milton Saute
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Lung Ventilation ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Pericardial Fenestration ◽  
Thoracoscopic Technique

Delayed-onset pericardial effusion following cardiac surgery can give rise to significant morbidity due to its presentation as well as management by traditional surgical techniques. An institutional experience of a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique to create a pericardial window, with the advantages of a minimally invasive approach combined with excellent visualization in such patients, was reviewed. A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic for delayed pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery from January 2001 to January 2006 at our center. Seven patients with echocardiographically diagnosed delayed tamponade underwent video-assisted thoracoscopy; 5 were receiving anticoagulants after valve replacement, and 2 had undergone heart transplantation. Pericardial windows were created under general anesthesia and single-lung ventilation using 2 to 3 trocars. Mean operative time was 45 min. There were no complications of the thoracoscopic technique. Video-assisted thoracoscopic creation of a pericardial window is safe and effective treatment for loculated pericardial effusions secondary to cardiac surgery.

scholarly journals US Database Study of Clinical Burden and Unmet Need in Recurrent Pericarditis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Klein ◽  
Paul Cremer ◽  
Apostolos Kontzias ◽  
Muhammad Furqan ◽  
Ryan Tubman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Cardiac Tamponade ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Constrictive Pericarditis ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Recurrent Pericarditis ◽  
Pericardial Window ◽  
Clinical Burden ◽  
Large Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Multiple Recurrences

Background Patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) may develop complications, multiple recurrences, or inadequate treatment response. This study aimed to characterize disease burden and unmet needs in RP. Methods and Results This retrospective US database analysis included newly diagnosed patients with RP with ≥24 months of continuous history following their first pericarditis episode. RP was defined as ≥2 pericarditis episodes ≥28 days apart. Some patients had ≥2 recurrences, while others had a single recurrence with a serious complication, ie, constrictive pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, or a large pericardial effusion with pericardiocentesis/pericardial window. Among these patients with multiple recurrences and/or complications, some had features relating to treatment history, including long‐term corticosteroid use (corticosteroids started within 30 days of flare, continuing ≥90 consecutive days) or inadequate treatment response (pericarditis recurring despite corticosteroids and/or colchicine, or other drugs [excluding NSAIDs] within 30 days of flare, or prior pericardiectomy). Patients (N=2096) had hypertension (60%), cardiomegaly (9%), congestive heart failure (17%), atrial fibrillation (16%), autoimmune diseases (18%), diabetes mellitus (21%), renal disease (20%), anxiety (21%), and depression (14%). Complications included pericardial effusion (50%), cardiac tamponade (9%), and constrictive pericarditis (4%). Pharmacotherapy included colchicine (51%), NSAIDs (40%), and corticosteroids (30%), often in combination. This study estimates 37 000 US patients with RP; incidence was 6.0/100 000/year (95% CI, 5.6‒6.3), and prevalence was 11.2/100 000 (95% CI, 10.6‒11.7). Conclusions Patients with RP may have multiple recurrences and/or complications, often because of inadequate treatment response and persistent underlying disease. Corticosteroid use is frequent despite known side‐effect risks, potentially exacerbated by prevalent comorbidities. Substantial clinical burden and lack of effective treatments underscore the high unmet need.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document