Initial and Long-Term Results of Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Total Occlusion of the Subclavian Artery

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srdjan Babic ◽  
Dragan Sagic ◽  
Djordje Radak ◽  
Zelimir Antonic ◽  
Petar Otasevic ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 534-538
Author(s):  
M Akif Cakar ◽  
E Tatli ◽  
A Tokatli ◽  
H Kilic ◽  
H Gunduz ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (13) ◽  
pp. E2089
Author(s):  
Junya Matsumi ◽  
Satoshi Takeshita ◽  
Shigeru Saito ◽  
Takeshi Akasaka ◽  
Yutaka Tanaka ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Abdallah Eltahlawi ◽  
Abdel-Aziz Fouad Abdel-Aziz ◽  
Abdel-Salam Sherif ◽  
Khalid Abdel-Azeem Shokry ◽  
Islam Elsayed Shehata

Abstract Background We hypothesized that 1st generation everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) stent associated with less complication and less restenosis rate than everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization guided by intracoronary imaging. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety and performance of BVS stent in CTO revascularization in comparison to EES guided by intracoronary imaging. Our prospective comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 60 CTO patients divided into two groups according to type of stent revascularization: group I (EES group): 40 (66.7%) patients and group II (BVS group): 20 (33.3%) patients. All patients were subjected to history taking, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, laboratory investigation, stress thallium study to assess viability before revascularization. Revascularization of viable CTO lesion guided by intracoronary imaging using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Then, long-term follow-up over 1 year clinically and by multi-slice CT coronary angiography (MSCT). Our clinical and angiographic endpoints were to detect any clinical or angiographic complications during the follow-up period. Results At 6 months angiographic follow-up, BVS group had not inferior angiographic parameters but without statistically significant difference (p = 0.566). At 12 months follow-up, there was no difference at end points between the two groups (p = 0.476). No differences were found at angiographic or clinical follow-up between BVS and EES. Conclusion This study shows that 1st generation everolimus-eluting BVS is non-inferior to EES for CTO revascularization. Further studies are needed to clearly state which new smaller footprint BVS, faster reabsorption, magnesium-based less thrombogenicity, and advanced mechanical properties is under development. We cannot dismiss the efficacy and safety of new BVS technology. Trial registration ZU-IRB#2498/3-12-2016 Registered 3 December 2016, email: [email protected]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document