Pharmacokinetic linearity of i.v. vinorelbine from an intra-patient dose escalation study design

Author(s):  
David Khayat ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
Ren� Brunet ◽  
Alain Goupil ◽  
Roland Bugat ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 224 (06) ◽  
pp. 398-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Witt ◽  
T. Milde ◽  
H. Deubzer ◽  
I. Oehme ◽  
R. Witt ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10535-10535
Author(s):  
Cornelis Martinus van Tilburg ◽  
Till Milde ◽  
Ruth Witt ◽  
Jonas Ecker ◽  
Angelika Seitz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Charles Gene Minard ◽  
Rachel Rau ◽  
Susan Hilsenbeck ◽  
Brenda J. Weigel ◽  
Elizabeth Fox ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The development of new anti-cancer agents for children requires an inherently longer timeline than in adults. The 3+3 study design for Phase 1 dose escalation trials is commonly used to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and assess safety. The Rolling 6 study design was developed to shorten the study conduct timeline. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This study compares twenty Phase 1 COG Pilot and Phase 1 Consortium trials that employed the Rolling 6 design with hypothetical results under the assumption that a 3+3 design had been executed. The number of evaluable patients required to complete the study, number of DLTs, number of inevaluable patients, overall study duration, time suspended to enrollment (i.e., waiting for DLT evaluation), and DLT risk are compared between study designs using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The Rolling 6 study design required less time to complete the studies compared with 3+3 design (median 273 vs. 297 days, P = 0.01). In general, the Rolling 6 study design required more patients, had more inevaluable patients, and there were more dose limiting toxicity (DLT) events. However, there was no significant difference in DLT risk (median 0.15 vs. 0.17, P = 0.72). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The Rolling 6 study design effectively shortens the study conduct timeline compared with the traditional 3+3 design for Phase 1 COG Pilot and Phase 1 Consortium trials without increasing the risk of toxicity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis M. van Tilburg ◽  
Till Milde ◽  
Ruth Witt ◽  
Jonas Ecker ◽  
Thomas Hielscher ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Until today, adult and pediatric clinical trials investigating single-agent or combinatorial HDAC inhibitors including vorinostat in solid tumors have largely failed to demonstrate efficacy. These results may in part be explained by data from preclinical models showing significant activity only at higher concentrations compared to those achieved with current dosing regimens. In the current pediatric trial, we applied an intra-patient dose escalation design. The purpose of this trial was to determine a safe dose recommendation (SDR) of single-agent vorinostat for intra-patient dose escalation, pharmacokinetic analyses (PK), and activity evaluation in children (3–18 years) with relapsed or therapy-refractory malignancies. Results A phase I intra-patient dose (de)escalation was performed until individual maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The starting dose was 180 mg/m2/day with weekly dose escalations of 50 mg/m2 until DLT/maximum dose. After MTD determination, patients seamlessly continued in phase II with disease assessments every 3 months. PK and plasma cytokine profiles were determined. Fifty of 52 patients received treatment. n = 27/50 (54%) completed the intra-patient (de)escalation and entered phase II. An SDR of 130 mg/m2/day was determined (maximum, 580 mg/m2/day). n = 46/50 (92%) patients experienced treatment-related AEs which were mostly reversible and included thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, anemia, and vomiting. n = 6/50 (12%) had treatment-related SAEs. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Higher dose levels resulted in higher Cmax. Five patients achieved prolonged disease control (> 12 months) and showed a higher Cmax (> 270 ng/mL) and MTDs. Best overall response (combining PR and SD, no CR observed) rate in phase II was 6/27 (22%) with a median PFS and OS of 5.3 and 22.4 months. Low levels of baseline cytokine expression were significantly correlated with favorable outcome. Conclusion An SDR of 130 mg/m2/day for individual dose escalation was determined. Higher drug exposure was associated with responses and long-term disease stabilization with manageable toxicity. Patients with low expression of plasma cytokine levels at baseline were able to tolerate higher doses of vorinostat and benefited from treatment. Baseline cytokine profile is a promising potential predictive biomarker. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01422499. Registered 24 August 2011,


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Barreto ◽  
Vijay K. Sharma ◽  
Annabelle Y. Lao ◽  
Peter D. Schellinger ◽  
Pierre Amarenco ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 179 (7) ◽  
pp. 471-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Vassilis Kouloulias ◽  
R. John Kouvaris ◽  
Christos Antypas ◽  
Kyriaki Mystakidou ◽  
George Matsopoulos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document