A phenological comparison of grizzly (Ursus arctos) and polar bears (Ursus maritimus) as waterfowl nest predators in Wapusk National Park

Polar Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 457-465
Author(s):  
Andrew F. Barnas ◽  
David T. Iles ◽  
Tanner J. Stechmann ◽  
Erin M. Wampole ◽  
David N. Koons ◽  
...  
ARCTIC ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-187
Author(s):  
Ian Stirling ◽  
Kristin L. Laidre ◽  
Erik W. Born

Since the late 1700s, reports of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) using tools (i.e., pieces of ice or stones) to kill walruses (Odobenus rosmarus) have been passed on verbally to explorers and naturalists by their Inuit guides, based on local traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) as well as accounts of direct observations or interpretations of tracks in the snow made by the Inuit hunters who reported them. To assess the possibility that polar bears may occasionally use tools to hunt walruses in the wild, we summarize 1) observations described to early explorers and naturalists by Inuit hunters about polar bears using tools, 2) more recent documentation in the literature from Inuit hunters and scientists, and 3) recent observations of a polar bear in a zoo spontaneously using tools to access a novel food source. These observations and previously published experiments on brown bears (Ursus arctos) confirm that, in captivity, polar and brown bears are both capable of conceptualizing the use of a tool to obtain a food source that would otherwise not be accessible. Based on the information from all our sources, this may occasionally also have been the case in the wild. We suggest that possible tool use by polar bears in the wild is infrequent and mainly limited to hunting walruses because of their large size, difficulty to kill, and their possession of potentially lethal weapons for both their own defense and the direct attack of a predator. 


2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dubey ◽  
Benjamin Rosenthal ◽  
Natarajan Sundar ◽  
G. Velmurugan ◽  
Kimberlee Beckmen

AbstractThe tissues of herbivores are commonly infected with cysts of parasites belonging to the apicomplexan genus Sarcocystis, but such sarcocysts are rare in bears. Here, we describe a new species, Sarcocystis arctosi, based on the mature sarcocysts identified in two brown bears (Ursus arctos) from Alaska, USA. Microscopic sarcocysts (37–75 × 20–42 μm) had thin walls (<1 μm). The outer layer of the sarcocyst, the parasitophorous vacuolar membrane (pvm), was wavy in outline and had minute undulations that did not invaginate towards the sarcocyst interior; these undulations occurred at irregular intervals and measured up to 100 nm in length and up to 60 nm width. The ground substance layer beneath the pvm was smooth and lacked microtubules. Longitudinally cut bradyzoites measured 5.6–6.8 × 0.7–1.8 μm. A major portion of nuclear small subunit rDNA sequence obtained from these sarcocysts was similar to that previously obtained from the hepatic schizonts of a S. canis-like parasite from polar bears (Ursus maritimus).


2001 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneche Utne Skaare ◽  
Aksel Bernhoft ◽  
Øystein Wiig ◽  
Kaare R. Norum ◽  
Egil Haug ◽  
...  

Zoo Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles T. Robbins ◽  
Troy N. Tollefson ◽  
Karyn D. Rode ◽  
Joy A. Erlenbach ◽  
Amanda J. Ardente

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 494-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rune Dietz ◽  
Frank F. Rigét ◽  
Christian Sonne ◽  
Erik W. Born ◽  
Thea Bechshøft ◽  
...  

1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 1297-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Smith ◽  
Ian Stirling

The subnivean lairs of the ringed seal (Phoca hispida) were studied in the Amundsen Gulf and Prince Albert Sound areas from 1971 through 1974. The structure of several different types of lairs are described. The existence of a birth-lair complex consisting of several closely adjacent lairs appears likely. The spacial distribution of lairs and lair types found on refrozen leads and in pressure ridges is described. Lairs were more abundant in inshore ice than in offshore ice. The function of subnivean lairs appears to be to provide thermal shelter, especially for neonate seals, and protection from predation by arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) and polar bears (Ursus maritimus).


Author(s):  
C. Youmans ◽  
R. Moore

Several important environmental factors which affect the dynamics of pocket gopher populations have been identified: water content at peak snowpack and depth of snow in spring (Hansen and Ward, 1966; Reid, 1973); weather and Its influence on annual food supplies and cover (Howard and Childs, 1959); production of annual and perennial forbs (Keith et al., 1959; Tietjen et al., 1967); and ground water levels and snow depths (Ingles, 1949; Hansen, 1962). A need for specific information on pocket gophers in Pelican Valley, Yellowstone National Park arose from interest in interactions between grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) and northern pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides). Mealey (1975) and Graham (1978) suggested that pocket gophers and their caches may serve as seasonally important food items for grizzlies in Yellowstone National Park.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document